Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant SPF SIG

1
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive
Grant (SPF SIG)
Town Hall Meeting
June 6, 2006
2
SPF SIG Goals

• 1. Prevent onset and reduce the progression of
  substance use, including underage drinking
• 2. Reduce substance-related problems in
  communities
• 3. Build prevention capacities/infrastructure at
  state and community levels
• Extending our thinking and results
• from individuals to population-level change

3
Goal 1

• Prevent the onset/progression of substance abuse.
• Priorities
• Youth and young adult alcohol use/abuse
• Marijuana use/abuse
• Cocaine/crack use/abuse
• Methamphetamine use/abuse
• Decrease risk factors/increase protective
• factors

4
Goal 2

• Reduce substance abuse-related problems in
  communities.
• Priorities
• Increase community/family/school
• connectedness
• Decrease school leaving
• Decrease risky sexual behavior
• Decrease impaired driving deaths
• Decrease substance-related crime
• Decrease senior substance use/abuse
• factors

5
Goal 3

• Build prevention capacity and infrastructure at
  state and community levels.
• Priorities
• Strengthen structures and formal linkages
• Strengthen champion roles
• Strengthen policies and procedures
• Strengthen quality of planning/evaluation/
• reporting
• Strengthen expertise

6
Outcome-Based Prevention
Substance-Related Consequences and Use
Intervening Variables
Programs/Policies/ Practices
Implementing the Strategic Prevention
Framework Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation and
Replanning
7
Why Outcomes Based Prevention?

• Starts with a focus on and attention to the SPF
  SIG goals (reducing use and related problems)
• Increases the likelihood of targeting significant
  problems (data-guided)
• Identifies and targets key intervening variables
  contributing to consequences/consumption
• Links strategies to key intervening variables and
  ultimately consequences/consumption
• Builds a basis for ongoing monitoring and
  evaluation activities to track and improve
  prevention efforts
• Lead with results, not with programs

8
Data Driven State Plan Components

• Epidemiological Profile
• State Priorities
• Planning Model
• Resource Allocation Mechanism
• Funding Sub-State Grantees
• Outcome Expectations/Evaluation

9
State Role in Outcome Based Prevention
Implementation

• Determine priority problem(s) to be addressed
  based on consequence(s)/ consumption patterns
• Determine allocation approach for distributing
  funds to address the problem(s)
• Develop initial logic model identifying
• Consequence/consumption pattern(s) to be
  targeted,
• Intervening variables that contribute to them,
  and
• Effective strategies to address intervening
  variables
• Support communities in process of local planning
  based on States initial logic model

10
Community Role in Outcomes Based Prevention
Implementation

• Understand problem to be addressed
• Assess intervening variables for planning
  purposes
• Determine intervening variables for intervention
• Choose/implement strategies (effective and
  relevant) to address intervening variables
• Goal Develop outcomes-based logic models that
  outline a locally defined strategic response for
  addressing SPF SIG priorities

11

• Phone [phone]
• Fax [phone]
• http//www2.state.tn.us/health/AD