Jean-Pierre Janssens - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Jean-Pierre Janssens

Description:

Head of division Inspection & Eco management. Tel 02/ 775 75 01. Fax 02/ 775 75 05 ... Mold into a mathematical formula (Indicator evolves in time) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: service179
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jean-Pierre Janssens


1
Brussels Institute for the Management of the
Environment
Indicator of Performance - The Inspectorate
  • Jean-Pierre Janssens
  • Director
  • Head of division Inspection Eco management
  • Tel 02/ 775 75 01
  • Fax 02/ 775 75 05
  • www.ibgebim.be
  • Gulledelle 100
  • 1200 Brussels
  • BELGIUM

2
Role of the inspectorate for management of the
environment
Inspections inspected enterprises, treated
files
  • Drivers
  • enterprises
  • other industrial act.
  • (demolition, )

reactions
treaded complaints
complaints troubles (eventually via politics)
Indicator of performance measuring the pressure
on the environment avoided thanks to the work of
the inspectorate
  • Pressure
  • nuisances
  • pollutions

impact
Particular problems ( - expositions -
observations -gt monitoring - awareness)
Neg. pressure of installations or of
non-conform situations
state
3
Reactions Activity of the inspectorate
  • Inputs resources
  • (human and financial)
  • Activities actions
  • (inspections, follow-up of files)
  • Outputs results
  • ( prosecution reports, warnings, administrative
    fines)
  • Impacts change as a result of activities and
    their outputs

4
Indicator of performance IMPACT
  • Change as a result of the activity of
    inspection and his output
  • ?( negative pressure of non conform
    installations)
  • positive effect of the activity of
    inspection
  • Mold into a mathematical formula
  • (Indicator evolves in time)

in absence of the work of the inspectorate
in presence of the work of the inspectorate
-
5
Neg. pressure of a non conform situation
  • f ( gravity of the infraction)
  • Administrative -gt O (regularization)
  • Technical
  • -gt importance of trespassing the norm
  • -gt multiples environmental concerned domains
  • f ( duration)
  • -gt stop the trespassing
  • ( not only to notice
  • but to stop)
  • -gt need a certain time to achieve conformity
    (condoning)
  • (opening -gt closing of files)
  • complex exercise
  • need for a more easy set of performance indicators

6
Parameters that influence the quality
  • Inputs resources
  • Activities actions (inspections)
  • Outputs results of observations
  • Impacts real changes

Structure Organization Inspectors Inspections Lega
l framework
  • - easier
  • more stable
  • Indicator of performance

complex and changeable
7
Parameters that influence the quality Work
conditions
  • Resources
  • Human sufficient and qualified inspectors (min
    criteria ?)
  • Financial budget needed for
  • Sampling analysis
  • On site measurements
  • To realize external studies (expertise)
  • Existing environmental legislation / permitting
    system
  • gt has to be enforceable
  • Clear and feasible technical requirements
  • Need for administrative enforcement tools
  • Need for criminal law enforcement tools

Inspection tools
8
Parameters that influence the quality Strategy
and working methods
  • Definition inspection philosophy
  • Compliance checking
  • Compliance promoting
  • Inspection strategy
  • Integrated inspections lt-gt single inspections
  • With on site visit
  • -gt drive by inspection
  • -gt in depth inspection
  • Without on site visit
  • -gt self monitoring data
  • -gt via external experts

minimum criteria ?
9
Parameters that influence the quality Strategy
and working methods
  • Problem analysis and priority setting
  • Well developed and regular updated DB of all
    potentially polluting installations / delivered
    permits (conditions)
  • Effective use of the available resources
  • Reactive lt-gt preventive inspection
  • Frequency related lt-gt performance related
  • 5 yrs inspection plan
  • 1yr inspection plan

Well defined targets (minimum standards?)
10
Parameters that influence the quality
  • Protocols and working instructions
    ---gtstandardizing between different inspectors
  • Administrative protocols (follow up) ex.report
    content on site visit
  • Technical protocols (check list on site inspector
    methodology)
  • Judicial protocols sanctioning strategy
    (condoning)
  • need for an inspectors vademecum
  • Need for on the job training.
  • -gt minimum number of hours of training
  • internal and external training?
  • Evaluation
  • well developed DB for the administrative follow
    up of the inspectors
  • individual --gtfile
  • collective --gtstatistics level inspection body
  • need for a quality assurance
  • annual reporting
  • regular external audit (?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com