Gravitational Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Gravitational Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks

Description:

Gravitational Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: magg104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gravitational Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks


1
Gravitational Instabilities in Protoplanetary
Disks
  • Annie C. Mejía
  • Astronomy Department
  • Indiana University

2
Collaborators
  • Nuria Calvet
  • Harvard-Smithsonian
  • Pat Cassen
  • NASA-Ames Research Center
  • Paola DAlessio
  • UNAM
  • Richard H. Durisen
  • Indiana University
  • Tom Hartquist
  • University of Leeds
  • Brian K. Pickett
  • Purdue University Calumet
  • John Rosheck
  • Indiana University
  • Dotty Woolum
  • Cal State Fullerton

3
OBSERVATIONS
4
Disk Statistics
  • Prevalence of Disks Around Young Stars
  • gt 50 of young stars have disks
  • Disks last 106 - 107 years
  • Measured masses range up to gt 10 the mass of the
    central star
  • Mass accretion rates lt 10-8 to 10-4 M? per year

5
Proplyds in the Orion Nebula
STSCI
2.5 light-years
5
5
6
STSCI
6
6
7
Disk Edge-on
8
Disk Face
HST
9
THEORY
10
Disk Structure
Infalling envelope
Wind
Disk
Accretion columns
Hartmann 1998
11
Disk Evolution
Hartmann 1998
STSCI
12
Gas Giant Planet Formation
  • Gas Giant Planets are Hard to Form
  • They must form while there is
    H He, i.e., in
    106 - 107 years
  • Core-accretion takes too
    long for Saturn, Uranus,
    Neptune

STSCI
13
Gas Giant Planet Formation
Pollack et al. 1996
14
Gravitational Instabilities
  • GIs
  • Spiral distortions in a self-gravitating disk
  • Appear wherever ? is high and T is low

15
EARLIER STUDIES
16
Toomre (1964)
  • Gravitational stability of disks
  • Measured by
  • Q cs?/?G?
  • Cs speed of sound, ? epicyclic frequency,
  • G gravitational constant, ? surface density
  • for Q lt 1 ? ring instability
  • for Q lt 1.5 - 2 ? spiral instability

17
Tomley et al. (1991, 1994)
  • Thermal energetics are critical
  • Cooling (Q ?)
  • Sustains spirals transport
  • Makes clumps if it is strong
  • Heating (Q ?)
  • Suppresses instability

18
Tomley et al. (1991, 1994)
Low Cooling Rate
High Cooling Rate
19
Pickett et al. (1998, 2000)
  • Different EOS
  • Locally
  • Isothermal
  • Locally
  • Isentropic
  • Adiabatic
  • With AV

20
Pickett et al. (1998, 2000)
  • Different resolutions
  • r,?,z 128,64,16
  • Double r and z
  • Double ?

21
Cooling, Heating Fragmentation
Gammie Fragmentation occurs when tcool
3/?.
22
THE FORMATION OF GAS GIANT PLANETS
23
Isothermal Solar Nebula
Solar Nebula Model R 10 AU
Md/M? 0.1 M? 1M? Q lt 1 in the
outer region Disk
expansion not allowed
Locally isothermal Planets formed
24
Isothermal Solar Nebula
Pickett et al. 2000
Boss 2000
25
Isothermal High Resolution
Boss 2000 High Resolution Isothermal
Evolution Persistent Dense Clump Forms
Pickett et al 2002 Our Best Isothermal Evolution
s No Persistent Clumps Form
26
SPH Simulations
  • Solar Nebula Model
  • R 20 AU
  • Md/M? 0.1
  • M? 1M?
  • Qmin 1.4
  • Locally isothermal
  • Adiabatic as
  • disk fragments
  • Planets formed

27
METHODOLOGY
28
Equilibrium 2D Models
  • How to make a star/disk model
  • Self-consistent field method
  • Hachisu 1987
  • Force balance ? potential
  • Polytropic EOS P ??
  • Md/M?, Rd/R?, ?(r) r-p
  • With or without the star

29
Equilibrium 2D Models
Md/M?1/7, Rd/R? 20, ?(r) r-1/2
30
3D Hydro Code
  • Numerical characteristics
  • 2nd order in space and time
  • Eulerian
  • Fixed cylindrical grid (r,?,z)
  • (128,64,16) to (512,256,64)
  • 105 to 8x106 cells
  • Runs in parallel on a SUN E10000

r 512
? 256
z 64
31
3D Hydro Code
  • Physics included
  • Solves
  • Poissons equation
  • Equations of hydrodynamics
  • Equation of state
  • EOS
  • Locally isothermal
  • Locally isentropic
  • Adiabatic

32
3D Hydro Code
  • Physics included
  • Heating
  • Artificial viscosity (shock heating)
  • Stellar irradiation
  • ?-type shear viscosity
  • Cooling
  • Volumetric cooling (const. tcool)
  • Eddington grey approximation
  • Flux-limited diffusion radiative cooling

implemented in progress coming soon
33
3D Hydro Code
  • Stellar irradiation, flux-limited diffusion
    radiative cooling
  • Radiative cooling in the atmosphere (?lt2/3)
  • Diffusion approximation (with flux limiter) in
    the interior of the disk (??2/3)
  • Irradiation (T? 4000 K, R? 2 R?)
  • DAlessio (2001) opacities, amax1?m

34
SIMULATIONS
35
Initial Model
Initial model for full physics simulations
R 40 AU Md 0.07M? M 0.5M? ?(r)
r-1/2 Qmin1.8
36
tcool2 ORP (500 yr)
37
tcool2 ORP (500 yr)
23.5 ORPs
10MJ
9MJ
3MJ
38
tcool2 ORP (500 yr)
6 ORPs
23.5ORPs
39
tcool2 ORP (500 yr)
Internal Energy (erg)
Luminosity (L?)
Time (ORP)
40
Various Constant tcool Disks
tcool 2 ORP
tcool 1/4 ORP
tcool 1 ORP
12 ORPs
?
18 ORPs
41
Irradiation, Flux Diffusion Radiative Cooling
42
Irradiation, Flux Diffusion Radiative Cooling
4 ORPs
43
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
44
Simulations
  • GIs play an important role in causing mass
    transport
  • Violent restructuring when Q first becomes lt 1.5
  • Persists later at a lower level with continued
    cooling
  • Rings of several MJ formed in the constant tcool
    cases, but no fragmentation so far

45
Planet Formation
  • Thermal energetics are critical
  • Isothermality favors fragmentation
  • Must include the effects of cooling and heating
  • Clump formation requires dominance of strong
    cooling
  • Shock heating tends to suppress it
  • High azimuthal resolution necessary

46
Future Efforts
  • Shear viscosity
  • Opacities with different maximum grain sizes.
  • SEDs
  • Adaptive mesh refinement

47
http//westworld.astro.indiana.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com