Title: Chapter 7 Problem
1Chapter 7 Problem 4
- Problem 4
- FastTrack Bikes, Inc. is thinking of developing a
new composite road bike. Development will take
six years and the cost is 200,000 per year.
Once in production, the bike is expected to make
300,000 per year for 10 years. Assume the cost
of capital is 10. - Calculate the NPV of this investment opportunity.
Should the company make the investment? - Calculate the IRR and use it to determine the
maximum deviation allowable in the cost of
capital estimate to leave the decision unchanged. - How long must development last to change the
decision?
2Chapter 7 Problem 4
- Cost is a 6 year annuity. Revenue is a 10 year
annuity starting at the end of the 7th year. - PV(Cost)
- 6N200000PMT10I/YR
- PV-871,052
- PV(Revenue)
- 10N300000PMT10I/YR
- PV-1,843,370
- Remember to discount back 6 periods
- 6N1,843,370FV10I/YRPV
- -1,040,534
- NPV-871,0521,040,534169,482
-
3Chapter 7 Problem 4
4Chapter 7 Problem 4
- IRR
- -200000CF-200000CF
- 300000CF..300000CF
- IRR12.66
- If the cost of capital estimate is off by 2.66,
then the decision might change from accept to
reject.
5Chapter 7 Problem 16
- You are considering investing in a new gold mine
in South Africa. Gold in South Africa is buried
very deep, so the mine will require an initial
investment of 250 million. Once this investment
is made, the mine is expected to produce revenues
of 30 million per year for the next 20 years.
It will cost 10 million per year to operate the
mine. After 20 years, the gold will be depleted.
The mine must then be stabilized on an ongoing
basis, which will cost 5 million per year in
perpetuity. Calculate the IRR of this investment.
6Chapter 7 Problem 16
- Initial Cost 250
- Income
- Revenue 30 for 20 years
- Cost 10 for 20 years
- Stabilization
- Cost 5/year in perpetuity
- NPV-250PVbenefits-PVstabilization
7Chapter 7 Problem 16
8Finance 350 Business FinanceNPV and
Fundamentals of Capital Budgeting (Slide 8)
- Instructor Yen-cheng Chang
9Review
- Investment Decision Rules
- NPV
- Payback Period
- No discounting
- Subjective cut-off period
- IRR
- Unconventional CFs
10Preview
- IRR
- Mutually exclusive projects scale and timing
- Projects with different lives
- Equivalent Annual Annuity
- Choosing among projects when resources are
limited - Chapter 8 Fundamentals of Capital Budgeting
11Mutually Exclusive Investment Decisions
- The problem of Scale
- Earning 100 over 1 is not as good as earning
10 over 1,000,000. - Compare two business ventures with the same
scale, r12 - (1) Joint venture with your girlfriend
- -10000, 6000, 6000, 6000
- NPV4,411
- IRR36.3
- (2) Solo venture in Internet café
- -10000, 5000, 5000, 5000
- NPV2,009
- IRR23.4
-
12Mutually Exclusive Investment Decisions
13Mutually Exclusive Investment Decisions
- What happens if I can scale up my solo venture by
5 times? - (1) Joint venture with your girlfriend
- -10000, 6000, 6000, 6000
- NPV4,411
- IRR36.3
- (2) Solo venture in Internet café
- -50000, 25000, 25000, 25000
- NPV10,046
- IRR23.4
14Mutually Exclusive Investment Decisions
- Choose Internet Café whenever the cost of capital
is lower than 20. - IRR always favors girlfriends business.
15Mutually Exclusive Investment Decisions
- Project As revenue concentrated in later periods
- Project Bs revenue concentrated in earlier
periods
16Crossover Point
- Crossover rate The discount rate that makes the
NPVs of two projects equal. - To find the crossover rate, take the difference
in cash flows first - Year 0 1 2 3 4
- CF -100 -75 0 75 150
- Then find the IRR using the differenceCrossover
rate 8.07Check NPV 47.36
17IRR
- Why use this rule?
- Consider time value of money
- Easier to talk about the rate of return for a
project than to talk about the dollar value of
the project. - Disadvantages
- Can not deal with nonconventional cash flows
multiple answers - May lead to incorrect decisions in comparing
mutually exclusive investments - The bottom line Only invest in the project if
the IRR is greater than the opportunity cost of
capital.
18Projects with Different Lives
- Scenario (1) Comparing solutions to the same
problem. (2) Solutions have different lives
before it can be renewed. (3) Our business
requires this solution for long term. - Internal network servers, assembly line
equipments, office building contracts, etc.
19Projects with Different Lives
- Example Compare two internal accounting
software - Option A (2 years)
- -100, -10, -10
- Option B (3 years)
- -140, -8, -8, -8
- Discount rate 10
- NPVA-117
- NPVB-159
- Can we use NPV to compare Option A Option B?
20Projects with Different Lives
- Compute a per year cost for the two alternatives
Equivalent Annual Annuity (annuity payment) - Find the constant annual payment that gives the
project NPVs (annuity PV). - Project A
- PV117 r10 N2
- C67.41
- Project B
- PV159 r10 N3
- C63.94
- Which is cheaper?
21Projects with Different Lives
- We assumed both solutions would be required for
long term. - What if we only require the service for only 2
years? - Option A (assuming we could resell the license
for a price at the end of the 2nd year) - -100, -8, -2
- Option B
- -140, -8, -8
- Use NPV
22Projects with Limited Resources
- What happens when we have limited resources to
devote to multiple NPVgt0 projects? - Limited resources human capital, budget, office
space, etc. - Goal Exhaust available resource to create the
highest total NPV. - Compute the
- Profitability Index
- NPV/Resource Consumed
23Projects with Limited Resources
- Example 26
- Orchid Biotech Company is evaluation several RD
projects for drugs. - Suppose Orchid has a budget of 60 million. How
should it prioritize projects? - Suppose Orchid has 12 scientists. How should it
prioritize projects?
24Projects with Limited Resources
- What are the PIs of the projects based on initial
capital? - What are the PIs of the projects based on
research scientists? - Use PI to rank projects until the total required
resource is exhausted.
25Chapter 8 Fundamentals of Capital Budgeting
- Capital Budgeting the decision making process
for investment decisions, i.e., deciding how much
and what to invest in. - We measure the incremental cash flows associated
with investment proposals and compare the PV of
future cash flows to the projects initial
investment amount. - NPVCF0PV(future incremental free cash flow)
- The two primary tasks in evaluating investment
proposals are - Measuring the relevant, or incremental free CFs,
and - Determining the appropriate discount rate.
26Incremental Earnings
- Earning is an accounting concept.
- Consider an investment in a new equipment
(operational for 5 years). - Equipment 1,020,000
- Cost 1,000,000
- Shipping Installation 20,000
- Plant redesign 50,000
- Revenue 500,000/year
- Cost 150,000/year
- Cost of Goods Sold
- Operational Expenses
- Accounting reminder To compute earnings,
investment expenses in plant, property, and
equipment are computed as depreciation for each
period. - Not a real CF outflow
27Incremental Earnings
- Incremental earnings before interest and taxes
(EBIT) - Incremental revenue Incremental cost
Depreciation - Depreciation (per period)
- 1,020,000/5
- 204,000
- Incremental earnings
- EBIT X (1 Corporate Tax Rate)
- Ignore interest payments unlevered net income,
unlevered earnings
28Incremental Earnings
29Cash is King
- How can I adjust (unlevered) earnings to reflect
incremental cash flows? - Depreciation is not a cash outflow add back
- Depreciation is still important because it
affects tax (cash flow) - Capital expenditure is a cash outflow subtract
- Changes in Net Working Capital subtract
- NWCCash Inventory Receivables - Payables
30Cash is King
- Compute the project incremental free cash flows
31Cash is King
- Example 8.4
- Assume receivables are 15 of sales payables are
15 of COGS. - New equipment costs 7.5m upfront.
- Compute the incremental FCFs.
32Cash is King
33Cash is King
34NPV
- To compute the NPV, we should use FCFs in the
numerator. - If we assume the yield curve is flat
- Well learn about how to estimate the denominator
(cost of capital) later.