Derek Heim - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Derek Heim

Description:

DEREK HEIM. SCHOOL OF PSYCHOLOGY. UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE. Compulsion or choice? ... Smoking kills and people's health would be better if they didn't smoke. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: derek59
Category:
Tags: derek | donuts | heim | quit

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Derek Heim


1
Compulsion or choice? A social perspective on
tobacco dependence
  • Derek Heim
  • School of Psychology
  • University of Central Lancashire

2
Before I begin...
  • Smoking kills and peoples health would be better
    if they didnt smoke.
  • There is not necessarily a mechanism for sane and
    rational people continually engaging in
    potentially lethal behaviour.

3
Addiction as an explanation
  • Characterises problematic behaviour.
  • Focuses on individual-level / pharmacological
    processes.
  • This is evidenced in the language we use to
    describe smoking (e.g. Treatment, Craving,
    Withdrawal).
  • Medicalises smoking e.g. focus on nicotine.

4
Problems with the concept of addiction
  • Exclusive focus on addictive properties of
    substances ignores contexts and motives for
    smoking smoking can be enjoyable.
  • Controlled smoking chipping (e.g. Presson et
    al., 2002).
  • Rat-park studies (e.g. Alexander, 1981).
  • Self-reports (e.g. Davies, 1997).

5
What vs why? (Davies, 2004)
  • Pharmacology of smoking explains what happens to
    peoples brain / body when they smoke.
  • Cant explain why people smoke.
  • Gender differences.
  • Social class.

6
Problems with addiction applied to smoking
  • Withdrawal symptoms not the strongest predictor
    of cessation outcome (see Russel Davies, in
    press).
  • Withdrawal /affective symptoms ease within 3-4
    weeks yet urge to smoke persists.
  • Medical treatment not necessary.
  • Close to 80 of those who quit do so without
    formal assistance (Zhu et al., 2000).
  • Instantanious quitting (West Sohal, 2006).

7
Evidence for compulsion is ambiguous
  • People (fail to) quit all the time.
  • Helpless addicts vs amazing willpower.
  • Smokers show much control over their smoking
    behaviour.
  • ?It is something people do, not something that
    happens to them.

8
Smoking as an addiction implications
  • As people learn to smoke, they learn to explain
    their behaviour in terms of addiction (Eiser,
    1977 et seq).
  • Belief in addictive properties of nicotine makes
    quitting more difficult (e.g. Katz Singh,
    1986).
  • Self-efficacy is undermined.

9
Redressing the balance
  • Drug, Set and Setting (Zinberg, 1984).
  • Smoking is an unhealthy choice.
  • Mediated by physiological aspects, personal
    situations and individual factors and social
    contexts.
  • (So are all choices).

10
Smoking has a sense-giving script
  • People smoke and quit for reasons.
  • If you ask people why they smoke they will give
    you meaningful answers (e.g. relaxation).
  • Personal reason for stopping (e.g. family,
    children and health).
  • Smoking is an appealing social identity for some.
  • Addiction can be part of this script.

11
Changing the script
  • The script makes sense of smoking and provides
    the framework within which decisions to smoke or
    quit are made.
  • To implement a decision to quit necessitates a
    change of the script.
  • Reinventing oneself as a non-smoker.
  • Addiction need not be a part of the script.
  • Young smokers may not see themselves as addicted
    (Amos et al., 2006 Sheffels Shou, 2007).

12
Picture by Banana Donuts (www.flickr.com/photos/an
nabananabobaloo/2967658060/)Creative commons
license
13
Conclusions
  • Its hard enough to stop smoking for
    pharmacological, personal and social reasons.
  • Conceptualising smoking in terms of addiction /
    dependence is a barrier we can and should remove.

14
Final thought
  • ...So therapists are right when they say that
    research cant help individuals learn to live
    with suffering, resolve moral dilemmas or make
    sense of their lives. But they must be disabused
    of the notion that their clients stories are
    literally true, or that they have no part in
    shaping them...
  • Tavris, 2003 xvii
  • In Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Lohr, J. M.
    (Eds.) (2003). Science and Pseudoscience in
    Clinical Psychology. New York Guilford.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com