QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND CATEGORIZATION OF COMMITMENTTOCHANGE STATEMENTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND CATEGORIZATION OF COMMITMENTTOCHANGE STATEMENTS

Description:

Tom Elmslie: University of Ottawa. Jacqueline Wakefield: McMaster University ... Inner city. Urban / suburban. Small town. Rural /Geographically isolated. 6% 63 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: LUCY68
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND CATEGORIZATION OF COMMITMENTTOCHANGE STATEMENTS


1
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND CATEGORIZATION OF
COMMITMENT-TO-CHANGE STATEMENTS
  • Heather Armson University of Calgary
  • Stefanie Roder McMaster University
  • Sarah Kinzie McMaster University
  • Tom Elmslie University of Ottawa
  • Jacqueline Wakefield McMaster University
  • The Foundation for Medical Practice Education
  • SACME Spring Meeting April 22-26 in Rancho
    Mirage, CA

2
Background
  • Commitment-to-change statements (CTCs) are used
    in a variety of educational activities to promote
    and document practice changes
  • CTCs are predictive of implementation of changes
    into practice
  • The components of CTCs that contribute to
    implementation of new practice behaviours are not
    known.

3
Background
  • Phase I
  • Development of practice reflection tool (PRT) to
    capture reflection CTCs at the end of small
    group discussions
  • The PRT encourages family physicians to
  • Reflect on the application of new knowledge to
    their clinical practices
  • Document the outcome of their learning session in
    the form of commitment-to-change (CTC)
    statements.
  • Review CTC at 3 months to assess successful
    implementation

4
PERSONAL PRACTICE REFLECTIONS IMPACT ON MY
PRACTICE (to be completed immediately after
reviewing the module) Name of Module
________________________ __ Date________________
_____ day / month /
year The most useful information for me
was This highlighted the following gap in my
current practice
5
Personal Practice Reflections Follow-up Review
Name of Module Date What change(s) did I
make in my practice? What were the barrier(s)
and/or facilitator(s) to my practice
change? What practice change(s) did I make that
I did not anticipate? I can identify other
change(s) I would like to make in my practice?
These are of the following The barrier(s) /
facilitator(s) that I am anticipating are
6
Purpose
  • Phase II

Can CTC statements be categorized to reflect a
cognitive hierarchy of increasingly complex,
higher level practice changes? Is there a link
between higher cognitive level of the CTC
statements and the likelihood of practice change?
7
Methods
  • Design Mixed Methods
  • Participants Family Physicians participating in
    PBSG / PBIL learning program
  • Procedures /Tools
  • Review of educational module on a specific topic
  • Group discussion of module topic
  • Documentation of the outcome of their learning
    session on a personal practice reflection tool
    (PRT)
  • most useful information
  • gap in my practice
  • Guided CTCs will change, considering
    change, confirmed practice, not convinced
  • Analysis Principles of grounded theory including
    iterative coding, constant comparison, data
    saturation

8
Categorization of PRT statements
Categorizing PRT statements according to the
Cognitive levels of Blooms Taxonomy
9
Sample Coding done using Blooms Taxonomy
10
Outcome of coding statements according to
Blooms Taxonomy
Questions on the PRT really present stimulus
questions that could be considered as leading the
physicians through a hierarchy of learning.
11
Categorization of CTC statements
Tried linking other Models of Physician Change
with Blooms Taxonomy and CTC statements from the
PRT
  • Models of Physician Change
  • Rogers, 1995 Steps in the Innovation- Decision
    Process
  • Fox, Mazmanian Putnam 1989 Stages of Change and
    Learning
  • Mazmanian Stages of Commitment-to-Change
  • Mazmanian 1999 Hierarchy of Outcomes
  • GrolWensing 2004 10 step model for inducing
    change

12
Categorization of CTC statements
  • The outcome of a learning session differed
    depending on where the physicians started with
    respect to existing practice and how they
    assessed the relative value of a practice change.
  • Five categories of outcomes were found in the
    data
  • unaware
  • scattered
  • systematize / construction
  • fine-tuning
  • confirmation

13
Development of coding book
14
Data - available
PRT 1 Impact on Practice PRT 2 Follow up
Review
PBSG Practice Based Small Group Learning
Program PBIL Practice Based Individual Learning
Program
15
Sample PRT -PBSG year 1 - unable to code
16
Sample PRT - PBSG year 1- Fine-tuning
17
Sample PRT - PBSG year 2 - Scattered
18
Sample PRT - PBIL year 2 Systematize /
construction
19
Conclusions
  • PRT does capture proposed practice changes
  • PRT enhances the development of CTC by using
    questions at different levels of learning
  • In process determine to what extent a hierarchy
    of CTCs relate to actual practice change

20
This study was in part funded by a grant from
Society for Academic Continuing Medical
Education (SACME) For further information please
contact armson_at_ucalgary.ca
21
Data - Demographics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com