Screening - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Screening

Description:

Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Research Programme ... Dr P Cassidy. Dr D Newbury-Birch. Imperial College and St Mary's Hospital. Dr M Crawford ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jmy58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Screening


1
Screening Intervention Programme for Sensible
Drinking (SIPS)
  • Dr Judith Myles
  • St Georges
  • University of London

2
Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Research
Programmenational brief intervention research
consortium
AE St. Marys


'Scientia Vincit Timorem'
3
  • This research has been made possible
  • By bringing together a national research
    consortium with expertise in screening and brief
    interventions in the alcohol field
  • Is taking place across three different settings
    and three different regions of England as
    different tools may be necessary in different
    settings
  • Funded by DH 3.2 million,
  • this being an action under the Alcohol Harm
    Reduction Strategy for England (2004)

4
Research Project Group
  • St Georges
  • Prof C Drummond (CI)
  • Dr J Myles
  • Dr A Oyefeso
  • Dr P Deluca
  • Mr T Phillips
  • Ms K Perryman
  • York
  • Prof M Bland
  • Mr S Coulton
  • Prof C Godfrey
  • Mr S Parrott
  • Newcastle
  • Dr E Kaner (DCI)
  • Prof C Day
  • Dr E Gilvarry
  • Dr P Cassidy
  • Dr D Newbury-Birch
  • Imperial College and St Marys Hospital
  • Dr M Crawford
  • Prof R Touquet
  • Alcohol Concern
  • Mr D Shenker

5
Research Project Group (cont.)
  • Consultants
  • Prof J Shepherd
  • Prof N Heather
  • Prof T Babor
  • Dr P Anderson
  • Dr M Stark
  • Mr P Turnbull

6
Research ConsortiumProject Steering Group
  • To include representatives from
  • Alcohol
  • Primary care
  • AED/Hospital/Mental Health
  • Criminal justice
  • Statistics
  • Commissioning
  • Service Users
  • DH and NTA

7
Aims
  • To identify
  • the best screening methods for AUD
  • brief intervention techniques for AUD
  • methods of implementation
  • those most appropriate
  • most acceptable
  • most cost-effective
  • across 3 health and social care settings
  • Primary Health Care (PHC)
  • Accident Emergency Departments (AED)
  • Criminal Justice Services (CJS)

8
Research Programme Design
  • Three settings
  • PHC
  • AED
  • CJS
  • Three cluster randomised clinical trials
  • Each with a purpose-designed project to assess
  • Identification of the most effective screening
    approach
  • Identification of the most effective and
    cost-effective intervention approach
  • Barriers and facilitators to implementation
  • 6 month follow-up

9
Research Programme Design (cont.)
  • To recruit patients from 24 PHC practices
  • 9 AEDs
  • 24 CJS
  • Across North East Region, London and South East
    Region
  • Aim to recruit over 2,600 patients across the
    three projects
  • All health and CJS staff to receive training and
    support from research team
  • Staff attitudes to be assessed to identify
    acceptability of implementing screening and brief
    interventions
  • Programme duration 2 years

10
Final proposal submitted, 25/7/05
11
How will we assess implementation?
  • Number screened, positives, received intervention
  • Factors supporting implementation
  • Factors impeding implementation
  • Impact individual, service, costs and benefits
  • Acceptability patient, practitioner,
    commissioner
  • Sustainability

12
How will we assess effectiveness?
  • Effectiveness of implementation
  • Extent of screening and intervention activity
  • Attitudes to SBI implementation
  • Patient outcome measures
  • Alcohol consumption
  • Alcohol related problems
  • Health related quality of life
  • Health related and wider societal costs

13
Toolkit
  • Screening toolkit and practical guidance for each
    setting based on optimal tool/method
    (targeted/universal)/setting combination
  • Intervention tools and implementation guidance
    based on findings tailored to each setting
  • Training package for professionals in each
    setting
  • PIL/CIL for each setting
  • Guide for commissioners of ASBI services
  • Resource website for providers

14
Rollout of findings
  • The results of this programme of research will be
    disseminated via
  • Formal reporting process to DH
  • Peer reviewed publications both nationally and
    internationally
  • Regional and local provider/commissioning fora

15
Key Stakeholders/Partners
  • Government Offices (DH, HO, NOMs etc.)
  • PCTs
  • DAATs
  • General Hospitals
  • General Practitioners
  • Courts, Prisons, Probation

16
Gains for Stakeholders
  • Toolkit to enhance practice and inform
    commissioning
  • Train staff
  • Incentives for participation
  • Accurate information on cost-efficacy and
    acceptability of brief interventions across
    settings

17
Interested in becoming a partner organisation?
  • Contact
  • Professor Colin Drummond, Chief Investigator
  • SIPS Research Programme
  • Section of Addictive Behaviour, Division of
    Mental Health
  • St Georges University of London
  • 4th Floor, Hunter Wing
  • Cranmer Terrace
  • London SW17 0RE
  • Tel. 020 8725 2783
  • Fax. 020 8725 2914
  • E-mail sips_at_sgul.ac.uk
  • Web www.sips.sgul.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com