NCAAAI%20UPDATES%20AND%20AUDIT%20INFORMATION%20Accountability%20Conference%202005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NCAAAI%20UPDATES%20AND%20AUDIT%20INFORMATION%20Accountability%20Conference%202005

Description:

NCAAAI UPDATES AND AUDIT INFORMATION. Accountability Conference 2005. Sheila Garner Brown ... NC State University. Session topics include: NC Alternate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: sheila70
Learn more at: https://www.dpi.nc.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NCAAAI%20UPDATES%20AND%20AUDIT%20INFORMATION%20Accountability%20Conference%202005


1
NCAAAI UPDATES AND AUDIT INFORMATIONAccountabilit
y Conference 2005
  • Sheila Garner Brown
  • Technical Outreach for Public Schools
  • North Carolina State University
  • sheila_brown_at_ncsu.edu

2
What is the NCAAAI?
  • Utilizes a checklist format to evaluate student
    performance.
  • Data are collected for baseline, interim and
    final scoring.
  • Per State Board policy HSP-C-005, eligible
    students with disabilities and students with
    limited English proficiency may participate in
    the NCAAAI instead of taking the multiple-choice
    test.
  • For students with disabilities and students
    identified as LEP, participation must be
    documented and students must meet specific
    criteria.

3
For which assessments can the NCAAAI be used as
an alternate?
  • Grade 3 Pretest in Reading and Math
  • EOG Tests in Reading and Math at Grades 3-8
  • Writing at Grades 4, 7, and 10
  • High School Comprehensive Test at Grade 10
  • EOC tests for Algebra I, Algebra II, Biology,
    Chemistry, Geometry, English I, Physical Science,
    and Physics
  • Statewide EOC Field Tests for Civics and
    Economics and U.S. History

4
What should I think about when choosing an
assessment for my student?
  • Academic functioning
  • Classroom assessments used
  • Classroom modifications/accommodations
  • Parent input
  • Student input
  • Team consensus

5
THE DECISION FOR ASSESSMENT SHOULD BE MADE ON AN
INDIVIDUALIZED BASIS AND SHOULD NOT BE PART OF A
BLANKET DECISION FOR A PARTICULAR SCHOOL OR
CLASS!!!!!!
  • The decision to place a student with
    disabilities on a particular assessment should be
    made as part of the IEP process after careful
    consideration of the students current academic
    functioning and how that student accesses the
    Standard Course of Study. The addition of
    guidelines for determining students with the most
    significant cognitive disabilities is a federal
    NCLB requirement for reporting purposes and
    should not affect the assessment decision of an
    IEP team.
  • DPI/TOPS Staff, TNN announcement 10/6/04

6
Principal and Assessor Responsibilities
  • Principals must
  • Assign assessors,
  • Ensure training occurs,
  • Monitor completion throughout the school year,
    and
  • Sign that all NCAAAIs are complete.
  • Assessors must
  • Teach the Standard Course of Study,
  • Attend training,
  • Follow procedures,
  • Meet with principal to review assessment,
  • Sign that NCAAAI is complete and accurate.

7
AUDIT INFORMATION
8
WHAT WERE WE LOOKING FOR?
  • Documentation of assessment decision.
  • All objectives scored.
  • Baseline scoring completed within 30 days.
  • Baseline Student Profile completed. (Questions
    answered with specific skills.)
  • Evidence included reflected scores on the
    assessment.

9
WHAT WERE WE LOOKING FOR? (cont.)
  • Eligibility documentation easily accessible for
    LEP and EC students.
  • Assessment History completed.
  • Scores properly transcribed.
  • Appropriate evidence/work samples (age and grade
    appropriate).
  • Work samples reflected Standard Course of Study.

10
WHAT WERE WE LOOKING FOR? (cont.)
  • For EC Students
  • Assessed grade level matches the work samples
    and IEP information.
  • Assessment choice makes sense based on previous
    performance on assessments.
  • Setting in which student receives EC services.
  • Types of accommodations routinely used in the
    classroom.

11
WHAT WERE WE LOOKING FOR? (cont.)
  • For LEP students
  • Types of accommodations routinely used in the
    classroom.
  • Students level of language proficiency for
    reading and writing.
  • Length of enrollment in U.S. schools.
  • Assessment choice makes sense based on previous
    performance on assessments.

12
WHAT WE FOUND
  • Most dates correct
  • Appropriate work samples (content)
  • Appropriate work samples (number)
  • Profiles completed
  • Assessment history completed
  • All items scored
  • Appropriate documentation

13
CONCERNS
  • IEP information and assessment choice did not
    match.
  • Successfully administered the standard test
    administration with accommodations previously
    now taking NCAAAI below grade level.
  • Working far below grade level being assessed on
    grade level.
  • Work samples included did not support scores.

14
CONCERNS (cont.)
  • Entire classes on same grade level even when
    students functioned on different academic levels.
  • Student profiles not complete or vague answers
    to questions.

15
Why is it possible for some students to achieve
proficiency when they are not performing on
grade level?
  • The federal government has realized the need to
    address concerns about proficiency for those
    students with the most significant cognitive
    disabilities as they relate to NCLB.
  • The December 9, 2003 Federal Register provided
    that states were allowed to report up to 1 of
    the tested student population as proficient based
    on alternate achievement standards.
  • Only students with the most significant cognitive
    disabilities may be included in this group.

16
Can a student with disabilities score proficient
using the NCAAAI?
  • All students with disabilities have an
    opportunity to score proficient on the NCAAAI IF
    they are being assessed on grade level and are
    completing grade level work.
  • Students with disabilities assessed 3 or more
    grade levels below can be scored proficient based
    on alternate achievement standards, if they are
    also considered to have a most significant
    cognitive disability.

17
What is a most significant cognitive disability?
18
To identify students with the most significant
cognitive disabilities, all of the following must
be true
  • The student requires extensive and explicit
    instruction to acquire, maintain, and generalize
    new reading and mathematics skills for
    independent living.
  • The student exhibits severe and pervasive delays
    in multiple areas of development and in adaptive
    behavior (e.g., mobility, communication, daily
    living skills, and self-care).
  • The students IEP annual goals focus on the
    functional application of academics (reading,
    mathematics, and writing).
  • The students performance is evaluated against
    alternate achievement standards (essences of the
    standard course of study or 3 or more years below
    grade level).
  • Guidelines for Making Decisions for the
    Participation of Students with Disabilities in
    the North Carolina Testing Program, September 2004

19
WHATS COMING UP NEXT?
  • New Alternates being developed for
  • Science Grades 5 and 8
  • Computer Skills
  • Courses required for AYP including
  • Algebra I
  • English I
  • Biology

20
WHY MAKE CHANGES?
  • Changes in NCLB/AYP requirements.
  • U.S. Dept. of Ed. allows alternate assessments
    for some students with disabilities.
  • Out-of-level assessments must be
  • Aligned with states academic content standards
    (Standard Course of Study)
  • Promote access to general curriculum
  • Reflect professional judgment of the highest
    achievement standards possible.

21
WHAT WILL THEY LOOK LIKE?
  • New thinking from federal government requires
    that alternate assessments link to grade level
    curriculum.
  • New grade level alternates would be created with
    the intention of serving all students in that
    grade with separate access points for each
    grade level.

22
TRAINING SESSIONS
  • PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT SUMMER INSTITUTE (PASI)
  • June 27-30 UNC Charlotte
  • July 11-14 UNC Wilmington
  • July 25-28 UNC Asheville
  • August 8-11 McKimmon Center
  • NC State University

23
Session topics include
  • NC Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory
    (NCAAAI)
  • NC Alternate Assessment Portfolio (NCAAP)
  • Online Test of Computer Skills
  • Writing Assessment at Grades 4, 7, and 10 Scoring
  • Item Development and Rubric Writing

24
Additional PASI Information
  • Half-day and full day sessions
  • NCAAAI and NCAAP sessions for new teachers and
    experienced teachers
  • Online registration through accountability
    website

25
WEBSITES
  • NCAAAI http//www.ncpublicschools.org/accountabili
    ty/testing/ncaaai/
  • Accountability http//www.ncpublicschools.org/acco
    untability/
  • Exceptional Children Division http//www.ncpublics
    chools.org/ec/
  • ESL http//www.learnnc.org/dpi/instserv.nsf/Catego
    ry4
  • North Carolina Standard Course of Study
    http//www.ncpublicschools.org/curriculum/
  • Testing Students with Disabilities
    http//www.ncpublicschools.org/accountability/test
    ing/alternate/
  • National Center on Educational Outcomes
    http//education.umn.edu/nceo/

26
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDED?
  • Sheila Brown, NCAAAI sheila_brown_at_ncsu.edu
  • 919.515.1431

27
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com