The Metric Wars: EVA versus Cashflow measures

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The Metric Wars: EVA versus Cashflow measures

Description:

BCG Boston Consulting Group. CFROI egenskaper side 383. CFROI beregnes som IRR (internrenten) ... With proper depreciation (sinking fund!) EVA is pro-growth ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: EKS3

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Metric Wars: EVA versus Cashflow measures


1
The Metric Wars EVA versus Cashflow measures
  • Ch 9
  • Arne Dag Sti

2
Competing value added approaches
  • EVA
  • promoted by
  • Stern Stewart Co
  • CFROI
  • Cash Flow Rate of Return on Investment
  • promoted by
  • Holt Value Associates (Chicago)
  • BCG Boston Consulting Group

3
CFROI egenskaper side 383
  • CFROI beregnes som IRR (internrenten)
  • CFROI blir beregnet utelukkende på grunnlag av
    kontantstrømmer
  • CFROI blir inflasjonsjustert
  • Kan ikke bli fortolket som internrenten
  • Fjerner seg fra Accrual accounting, dvs
    regnskapsbaserte tall
  • Realrente, ikke nominalrente

4
CFROI and EVA
  • Similarity to EVA
  • CFROI is normally calculated on an annual basis
    and is compared to an inflation-adjusted cost of
    capital to determine whether the company has
    earned returns superior to its cost of capital
    and thus created shareholder value for its
    shareholders.
  • Both methods assume that management creates value
    by earning returns on invested capital greater
    than the cost of capital.

5
Steps in CFROI calculationsFigure 9-2 page 387
  • Step 1 Estimate economic life of depreciable
    assets of the company
  • Step 2 Estimate the gross cashflows, inflation
    adjusted
  • Step 3 Estimate gross cash investment
  • Step 4 Calculate the non-depreciating assets
    (such as land and inventories) . Calculate the
    terminal value of such assets at the end of the
    horizon
  • Step 5 CFROI as IRR of the real cash flow
    investment project

6
The CFROI Valuation Model
  • Value of the firm
  • Value of existing assets
  • Value of future investments
  • Formula page 389
  • Formula page 390

7
3 Components of Market Value
  • Market value
  • Invested capital
  • Present value of future EVAs from assets in place
  • Present value of future EVAs from future
    investments
  • EVA terminology
  • COV Current Operations Value
  • FGV Future Growth Value

8
Rest of Ch 9
  • A case study of CFROI (9 pages)
  • The CFROI fade (5 pages) The evidence isnt
    convincing
  • Harnischfeger Industries (4 pages)
  • Does a predictable fade really exist?

9
CFROI and Inflation
  • Adjusting for inflation is one of the distinctive
    selling features of CFROI
  • illustrated in 4 steps
  • page 405-406
  • numeric example
  • Inflation affects CFROI in three major ways
  • 1) Gains/losses from monetary assets/liabilites
  • 2) Inflation adjustment for fixed assets
    (gjenanskaffelsesverdier)
  • 3) Inventories

10
EVA or CFROI? Authors conclusion from the
example
  • EVA has flexibility in deciding which accounting
    adjustments to make (if any).
  • .
  • EVAs relative simplicity gives it important
    advantages over CFROI as a divisional performance
    measure
  • The CFROI metric requires a comprehensive set of
    adjustments, some of which are complex and
    difficult for line managers to understand

11
The Holt/BCG critique of EVA
  • EVA is biased against growth
  • EVA ignores dividend payments
  • EVA is biased by size and difficult to interpret
    or benchmark
  • EVA is not adjusted for inflation
  • Pga lineær avskrivning This practice results in
    understating EVA in early years
  • EVA based on the firm as a separate entity MM
  • Dollar measure versus
  • Nominal dollar measure

12
Authors conclusionson the Holt Critique
  • With proper depreciation (sinking fund!) EVA is
    pro-growth
  • EVA does not ignore dividends (Holt confusion)
  • EVA is not biased by size (Holt confusion)
  • Inflation?
  • Implicitly they admit that inflation might be a
    problem
  • but ..
  • .
  • This might be adjusted for if it is important
  • by the cost-benefit test

13
Appendix The Cost of Capital under CFROI
  • The Holt CFROI approach assumes that
    company-specific risk is a function of financial
    leverage and size, two risk factors that cannot
    be eliminiated through diversification and
    therefore should be reflected in discount rate
    differentials
  • Interesting views!
  • Why?
  • CAPM too simple for practical use?
  • Practical integration of insights from Arbitrage
    Pricing Theory
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)