Metadata Management in Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Metadata Management in Practice

Description:

Free-text entry (summary, title) Pick list selections (small flat lists) ... MAP design currently abstract and on paper, possible difficulties to encode and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: lynnhe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Metadata Management in Practice


1
Metadata Management in Practice
  • New Directions in Description Series
  • March 2006
  • Lynn Herbert
  • Innovation, Information and Technology Branch
  • Service Canada

2
Overview
  • Metadata as Key IM Enabler
  • Metadata Management Business Case
  • Aspects of Metadata Management
  • Metadata Framework
  • Tools
  • Quality of Metatagging
  • Change Management Processes
  • Vertical and Horizontal Metadata (GC enterprise
    governance and initiatives)
  • Current and Future Challenges

3
Metadata as Key IM Enabler
  • Metadata more than descriptive enriched
    metadata sets used mostly for delivery and
    life-cycle administration
  • Metadata for Delivery
  • Dynamic web sites and linking pages, without dead
    links
  • Portals and personalization
  • Facet combinations to target specific client
    segments and jurisdictions
  • English / French pages
  • Page sensitive contact and help information
  • Advanced and structured search
  • Weighting control and sorting
  • Addresses sustainability issues for GOL clusters

4
Metadata as Key IM Enabler
  • Metadata for Delivery, continued
  • Store content once, publish to any number of
    views
  • Separate policy and program information from
    service information
  • Multi channel use
  • Adapt to changing client needs and departmental
    priorities
  • Metadata for Administration
  • Structured authoring templates
  • Re-usable content objects and documents
  • Documents management
  • Records management and archiving
  • Publishing process management
  • Business processes and workflows
  • Quality control and accountability
  • End-to-end lifecycle management of the information

5
Business Case for Metadata Management
  • Complex frameworks and schemes are required to
    support all aspects of delivery and
    administration
  • Requires governance, tools and processes for
    creating metadata and managing change
  • Sustainability
  • Demonstrate the value of metadata, and recognize
    that the effort required needs to continue
    providing value (ROI)
  • Adaptability
  • Continuous improvement, changing business
    priorities and services
  • Evolving technologies, vocabularies, concepts,
    information architectures, business processes and
    requirements
  • Quality of metadata values
  • Harmonization with evolving GC standards

6
Aspects of metadata management
  • Metadata Frameworks
  • Tools
  • Quality of Metatagging
  • Change Management Processes
  • Vertical and Horizontal Metadata (GC enterprise
    governance and initiatives)

7
Metadata Frameworks
  • Framework is first step in managing metadata
  • Metadata Element Sets
  • Metatag name (e.g. dctitle, dcsubject,
    gcterms.topicGC, etc)
  • Label (Title, Subject, Topic, etc)
  • Definition (intended scope or purpose of the
    metadata element)
  • Datatype
  • Metadata Application Profiles (MAP) is a
    standardized set of metadata elements, plus rules
    for applying them
  • Comprised of elements from one or more element
    sets
  • Inherits rules of the element set plus can
    further define, narrow or enforce (rules define
    how the metatag value is populated and used
    within an application)

8
Metadata Frameworks
  • MAPs, continued
  • Single or multiple values
  • Optional, Mandatory, Conditional
  • Schemes and vocabularies to use
  • Relationship to other metadata elements and to
    business process
  • System auto-population
  • Schemes controlled vocabularies or date
    standards, e.g.
  • Namespaces for element sets and schemes
  • Metadata Registries

9
Tools
  • Technical tools are required to manage metadata
    frameworks, assist metatagging, index the
    metadata, and search on metadata values
  • Metatagging interfaces for authors
  • Elements encoded in user-friendly interfaces,
    using labels
  • Populate values for elements and perform
    automated metatagging
  • Mandatory metatagging enforced through workflow,
    with business processes for review and approval
  • Free-text entry (summary, title)
  • Pick list selections (small flat lists)
  • Search and browse complex hierarchical and
    relational vocabularies (CST, Location)
  • Authors dont have to deal with complexity of
    underlying metadata

10
Tools
  • Vocabulary (scheme) management tool
  • Administrator interface to create and edit
    controlled vocabularies in both official
    languages
  • Governance on vocabulary control centralized and
    enforced
  • Ensure vocabulary updating is part of overall
    change management process
  • Metadata indexes and searching
  • Structured indexes and query language
  • Filtered results based upon facet combinations
  • Queries can be pre-run for faster results (Verity
    Topics)
  • Combination arrays of boolean queries can be
    pre-processed or live
  • Embedded within URLs and applications
  • Menu choices within pages
  • Enhance free-text search results and assist
    weighting and sorting
  • Index brokering (federation)

11
Quality of Metatagging
  • Issues with metadata value selections
  • too many, not enough or too much the same
  • confusion between elements or about purpose of
    element
  • failure to review system-generated metadata (e.g.
    summary)
  • non-expressive titles and descriptions
  • managing expectations both negative and
    positive

12
Quality of Metatagging
  • Some solutions
  • Workflow procedures for metatagging review and
    revision by experts, without creating delays
  • Ongoing metatagging documentation and training
    support
  • Continuous demonstration of the purpose and value
    of metadata - showing authors the why of
    metadata is most effective, especially in dynamic
    site areas or when metadata is used in enhanced
    search
  • Use technology to limit number of choices
  • Construct metadata reports
  • English/French consistency
  • Tracking dynamic page performance
  • Information architecture and taxonomy usage and
    review
  • Usage reports by element
  • Monitor quality of descriptions and titles

13
Change Management Processes
  • In a fully functional metadata system changes may
    have little impact on the business authors or
    metatag specialists, but need to be well planned
    to ensure the changes are incorporated at all
    points in the system
  • Framework registry and documentation
  • Interfaces
  • Vocabularies
  • Workflows and scripts
  • Dynamic site configurations
  • Search configurations
  • Stored queries
  • Regenerating or targeted retagging of content
  • Alerting authors of new or changed values
  • Batch changes and conduct change management
    process in regular cycles
  • Analyze change impacts and plan steps

14
Vertical and horizontal metadata
  • Horizontal Metadata
  • For web sites - 5 Common Look and Feel metatags
    without tools (2000-2006)
  • GC enterprise WCMS suite Interwoven, Verity,
    Oracle Portal - provides opportunity for rich
    metadata set for both administering and
    delivering content and information services
  • CMS Metadata Element Set and MAP being developed
  • RMMES and RM-MAP recently approved
  • RDIMS and IM Business Rules initiative
  • GC enterprise vision is that we can share core
    metadata
  • Delivery Interoperability and government-wide
    provision of information service offerings and
    retrieval, personalization, faceted views, and
    client segmentation
  • Administration shared IM business processes,
    leverage development and best practices, and
    GC-wide content reuse and information portability

15
Vertical and horizontal metadata
Without shared metadata
With shared metadata
  • Multiple departmental metadata indexes brokered
    at GC level as one virtual index
  • Shared business processes, workflows and
    interfaces possible
  • Shared cost of development
  • Shared development of training materials
  • All efforts build on core functionality to get
    the most from investment in solution
  • Leveraging content for GC-wide reuse
  • GC-wide service offerings
  • Multiple departmental metadata indexes
  • Mapping and equivalencies at GC level difficult
    if not impossible
  • No shared processes or interfaces
  • Labour-intensive and costly development with no
    investment reusability
  • Difficult to go beyond the basics
  • Ongoing web site silos

16
Vertical and horizontal metadata
  • Vertical Metadata
  • ECM concept covers all aspects of IM including
    documents management and authoring, publishing
    and web delivery, search, records keeping, ATIP,
    correspondence management, accountability, etc
  • Harmonized metadata for DM, CM, RM even though we
    dont yet have linked/integrated technologies or
    processes
  • Departments will be able to use the CM, RM and DM
    functional elements as core building blocks to
    integrate IM vertically
  • GC enterprise CMS-MAP moves us beyond
    department-specific or application-specific silos
    and becomes a key enabler for decentralized
    sharing
  • Connects authors, content and presentation
    objects, technical systems and interfaces,
    business processes, workflows and system events,
    content repositories, publishers, web sites,
    search indexes, dynamic web pages, and end-users
    in the IM life-cycle

17
Current and Future Challenges
  • We need to start demonstrating the value-added
    services of metadata, or risk losing business
    support and momentum
  • Metadata governance, quality assurance and change
    management processes are key
  • The metadata will only be value-added if it is of
    high quality and usefulness
  • Change management processes will be key to
    success as changing metadata in the MAP is the
    easy part
  • The change management processes in a functioning
    CMS can be complex, and departments should plan
    for adequate time, tracking, process cycles and
    governance issues

18
Current and Future Challenges
  • We are in a race to finalize the CMS-MAP before
    critical mass of departmental WCMS
    implementations and tagged files are in place
  • The MAP can be implemented by any department
    regardless of WCMS status, as it can still be
    useful for interoperability and standardization
  • Departments may need to add extensions to the MAP
    to incorporate specific additional requirements
  • Perfect the MAP as much as possible prior to
    giving it to implementers, and before content is
    tagged
  • MAP design currently abstract and on paper,
    possible difficulties to encode and implement in
    the enabling technology

19
Current and Future Challenges
  • Content objects for repurposing and reuse
  • Will require metadata at the content object
    level, and increase issues of metadata management
  • Authoring templates
  • Metadata registry for namespace, elements, MAPs
    and schemes
  • XML repositories
  • Combination of decentralized and centralized
    metadata authoring

20
Contact Information
  • Lynn Herbert
  • Project Manager
  • Enterprise Information Management Directorate
  • Innovation, Information and Technology Branch
  • Service Canada
  • lynn.herbert_at_servicecanada.gc.ca
  • 994-0688
  • www.servicecanada.gc.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com