NETCONF WG

1
NETCONF WG

• IETF 71, Philadelphia, PA
• March 10, 2008
• 1740 1950

2
Before we can start ...

• We need
• 2 minute takers
• 1 Jabber scribe

3
Note Well

• Any submission to the IETF intended by the
  Contributor for publication as all or part of an
  IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made
  within the context of an IETF activity is
  considered an "IETF Contribution". Such
  statements include oral statements in IETF
  sessions, as well as written and electronic
  communications made at any time or place, which
  are addressed to
• -the IETF plenary session,
• -any IETF working group or portion thereof,
• -the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the
  IESG,
• -the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the
  IAB,
• -any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list
  itself,
• any working group or design team list, or any
  other list
• functioning under IETF auspices,
• -the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function
• All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules
  of RFC 3978 (updated by RFC 4748) and RFC
  3979(updated by RFC 4879).
• Statements made outside of an IETF session,
  mailing list or other function, that are clearly
  not intended to be input to an IETF activity,
  group or function, are not IETF Contributions in
  the context of this notice.
• Please consult RFC 3978 (and RFC 4748) for
  details.
• A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to
  accept all IETF rules of process, as documented
  in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG
  Statements.
• A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges
  that written, audio and video records of meetings
  may be made and may be available to the public.

4
Agenda

• Scribes (done)
• Agenda bashing 2'
• Use of mailing list(s)
• WG status review 10'
• Current charter items
• NETCONF over TLS 20'
• Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF 20'
• NETCONF monitoring 20'
• Other Netconf-related drafts
• Experience of implementing NETCONF over SOAP 5'
• Discussion on ongoing implementations 10'
• AOB
• Open mic

5
NETCONF WG overview

• New co-chairs have been announced on January 9,
  2008
• Bert Wijnen ltbertietf_at_bwijnen.netgt
• Mehmet Ersue ltmehmet.ersue_at_nsn.comgt
• Charter page updated to reflect new WG items and
  schedule
• http//www.ietf.org/html.charters/netconf-charter.
  html
• Additional Netconf page moved to
• http//www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/trac/wiki
• Netconf maillist moved to
• netconf_at_ietf.org

6
WG Status

• Notification document finalized by WG
• IESG Last Call done
• Proto writeup prepared by Bert
• IANA had some questions
• Ballot has been deferred to the next IESG
  telechat on March 20, 2008
• Current status IESG Evaluation Defer

7
Use of mailing lists

• Current active maillists
• netconf_at_ietf.org NETCONF WG charter topics
• ngo_at_ietf.org Generic Netconf-related
  discussion
• yang_at_ietf.org YANG discussion list

8
Current charter items

• NETCONF over TLS
• Mohamad Badra
• Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF
• Balazs Lengyel, M. Bjorklund
• Netconf monitoring
• Mark Scott, Sharon Chisholm, M. Bjorklund
• Please review the documents above and discuss on
  the maillist
• Schema advertisement
• Schema (list) advertisement and schema (body)
  retrieval merged to netconf-monitoring draft
• Configuration interface advertisement and NMS
  development automation (not chartered) are
  planned to prepare for Dublin (Mark Scott,
  Hideki Okita)

9
Charter items

• NETCONF over TLS (20 minutes)
• Charlie Kaufman (on behalf of Mohamad Badra)
• http//tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netconf-tls-01
  .txt
• Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF (20 minutes)
• Balazs Lengyel
• http//tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netconf-partia
  l-lock-01.txt
• Netconf monitoring (20 minutes)
• Sharon Chisholm/Mark Scott
• http//tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-netconf-monito
  ring-01.txt

10
Other related drafts

• Experience of implementing NETCONF over SOAP (5
  minutes)
• Tomoyuki Iijima
• http//tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/draft-iijima-netc
  onf-soap-implementation-06.txt

11
Ongoing implementations

• Discussion on ongoing implementations
• Brief report on implementations
• Who is going to implement the new WG items?
• Should the WG plan an interop-event for testing
  of RFC 4741-4744 to get them to DS?
• Is the WG interested to develop a BCP document?

12
AOB

• AOB
• Open mic
• How urgent is the AC mechanism draft?
• NETCONF-related requirements on DML
• Any other hot topics to discuss?