Linguistics%20001:%20Linguistic%20Typology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Linguistics%20001:%20Linguistic%20Typology

Description:

What the fixed word-order of the language is in ... Both dog and woman are 3s... Then we can talk about what is wrong with *Me saw he. *Us ate. More Case ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: artsands
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linguistics%20001:%20Linguistic%20Typology


1
Linguistics 001 Linguistic Typology
  • Part II Further aspects of Typology

2
Recall that
  • We are examining some the various ways in which
    languages differ
  • In the background, the question is how these
    differences can be reconciled with the idea that
    there is an innate aspect of language
  • In our final examples from the last lecture, we
    began looking at syntactic typology and word order

3
Review, cont.
  • We introduced in the abstract some different
    types of variation
  • Whether a language has a fixed word-order or not
  • What the fixed word-order of the language is in
    the first place
  • Whether there have to be subject and object Noun
    Phrases in the first place
  • Our illustration concentrated on the first type,
    whether or not a language allows free word order

4
Todays topics
  • Word order typology, continued
  • Ergativity
  • Morphology Templates

5
Comparison
  • English
  • The man saw the vessel. (SVO)
  • Mapudungun
  • All six possibilities of linear order are
    grammatical
  • The idea was that in Mapudungun, information
    about subject, object etc. is found in the verbal
    morphology

6
Word Orders
  • In addition to allowing SVO sentences, all of the
    other possible arrangements are grammatical as
    well
  • INche metawe pefin. SOV
  • Metawe iNche pefin. OSV
  • Metawe pefin iNche OVS
  • Pefin metawe iNche VOS
  • Pefin iNche metawe VSO

7
Agreement and Free Word Order
  • How are the grammatical roles of these noun
    phrases determined?
  • Above the verb is given as
  • pefin
  • This verb actually has a lot of information in
    it
  • Pe-fi-n
  • See-Object.Marker-1sS
  • That is, the verb says that the subject is first
    person singular, and that there is a third person
    object.
  • Thus the different word orders can be understood
    as expressing the same basic proposition

8
Free Word Order and Case
  • Another type of language that has free word order
    shows case morphology.
  • Consider the following forms of the noun femina
    woman in Latin (the colon indicates vowel
    length)
  • Singular Plural
  • Nom. femina feminae
  • Acc. feminam feminas
  • Dat. feminae feminis
  • Gen. feminae feminarum
  • Abl. femina feminis
  • Note that the ends of these words indicate the
    grammatical role. On nouns, such morphemes are
    called case morphemes

9
Case, continued
  • This means that in Latin, where the word order is
    relatively free, the role that a particular NP
    plays is encoded on that that NP
  • Femina canem videt.
  • woman-NOM dog-ACC sees
  • The woman sees the dog
  • Canem femina videt.
  • Videt canem femina.
  • .

10
Nouns and Verbs
  • Whatever order the words may appear in, the Nouns
    (NPs), as long as the case marking is the same
    the basic semantics is the same.
  • The information is not entirely marked in the
    verb, which conveys person, number, tense, but
    not the full message about the event
  • The verb here is see, marked for 3s and present
    tense. Both dog and woman are 3s
  • Latin probably has a basic word order (SOV),
    but uses these variants freely to emphasize or
    deemphasize different parts of the sentence
    (Mapudungun too probably)

11
Back to basic word orders
  • As we discussed above, there are some languages
    that do not allow free word order
  • Languages (of this type) tend to display a basic
    word order, which is used in unmarked
    circumstances
  • Among these, there are again differences in terms
    of what order is employed

12
Possibilities/Illustrations
  • SVO
  • English The man ate the apple.
  • SOV (remember Hindi in the last class)
  • Turkish
  • Hasan öküz-ü ald1.
  • Hasan ox-ACC bought.
  • In these two types, what differs is the relative
    position of the verb and the object NP
  • Remember that a simple way of thinking of this
    was that the tree structures are the same, with
    the order of V and the NP object reversed

13
Remember
  • S
  • NP AuxP
  • Rahul VP Aux
  • NP V had
  • the book read
  • This is the Hindi version. Look carefully at what
    has changed.

14
VOS
  • Basic VOS Word Order
  • Malagasy (spoken in Madagascar)
  • Nahita ny mpianatra ny vehivavy
  • saw the student the woman
  • The woman saw the student
  • VOS doesnt provide the same challenge as VSO,
    which we discussed last time (draw the tree)
  • At the same time, it might be the case that this
    isnt just the subject mirror image of SVO

15
Object-initial?
  • While the above patterns are clearly attested,
    orders in which the object appears first are hard
    to find
  • One example of OVS
  • Hixkaryana (Carib, N. Brazil)
  • Toto yahosIye kamara.
  • man grab jaguar
  • The jaguar grabbed the man
  • In many cases the situation is complicated
    because of what it means to have a basic word
    order in the first place (e.g. you can get OVS
    order in lots of languages the question is, is
    this basic or not)

16
Frequencies
  • Some studies take samples of languages and count
    the percentages of these types (e.g. Mallinson
    and Blake 1981)
  • SOV 41
  • SVO 35
  • VSO 9
  • VOS 2
  • OVS 1
  • OSV ??
  • While such numbers give us an idea of whats out
    there, it is not clear what else we can learn
    from them, given that the samples are reflections
    of non-linguistic factors (history)

17
Verb-initial orders VSO
  • VSO
  • Welsh
  • Lladdodd y ddraig y dyn.
  • killed the dragon the man
  • The dragon killed the man.
  • Question Can this be derived as
    straight-forwardly as SVO/SOV, where we just
    change the order of the VP?

18
Questions
  • Specifically can we relinearize the SVO tree
    to yield the VSO tree?
  • Answer Not without crossing lines
  • If we do not want to cross lines, then something
    additional must be happening in VSO languages.

19
That is
  • Consider
  • S
  • NP VP
  • The man V NP
  • killed the dragon

20
English questions
  • Remember, English is
  • S (AUX) V O
  • John didnt eat the apples
  • But in questions, the AUX is moved to a position
    that precedes the subject
  • Didnt John t eat eat apples?
  • The same type of solution can be applied to Welsh
    (and VSO generally)

21
Ergativity An Introduction
  • Weve seen cases like Nominative and
    Accusative e.g.
  • I saw him.
  • I nominative case form of 1st singular
  • Him accusative case form of 3rd singular
  • Even in English, where we dont see it very often
    (only in pronouns), we have the following
    pattern
  • Subject Nominative case
  • Object Accusative case
  • Then we can talk about what is wrong with
  • Me saw he.
  • Us ate.

22
More Case
  • As we saw earlier, some languages like Latin mark
    their nouns for different cases more thoroughly
  • Reviewing, note that we can have
  • Femina poetam videt.
  • woman-NOM poet-ACC see-3s
  • The woman sees the soldier
  • Any order of these words means the same thing

23
A simple point
  • Heres an additional point about English and
    Latin
  • The subject of an intransitive verb is marked
    with the same case as the subject of a transitive
    verb
  • I ate/I saw him.
  • Femina poetam videt/Femina cantat
  • (as on previous) woman-NOM sings

24
Continuing
  • Although English has relatively little
    morphology, on pronouns, there are distinctions
  • I saw him Me saw him.
  • He saw I He saw me.
  • I ran Me ran
  • Notice that the subject of an intransitive and
    the subject of a transitive are identical
    objects of transitives are distinct
  • Obvious, right? Not really, because not all
    languages work that way.

25
Illustration
  • Dyirbal (spoken in Australia)
  • Intransitive
  • Numa banaga-nYu
  • father-ABS return-NONFUT
  • father returned
  • Transitive
  • yabu-Ngu numa bura-n
  • mother-ERG father-ABS see-NONFUT
  • Mother saw father
  • Compare
  • Numa-Ngu Yabu bura-n father saw mother
  • Important point numa father is in the same
    case in the first two examples
  • Follow up The special case in the transitive
    is on yabu mother

26
Terminology
  • The cases in languages like Dyirbal (there are
    many) have different names from nominative and
    accusative
  • Subject of Intrans/Object of Trans Absolutive
  • Subject of Transitive Ergative
  • This kind of case pattern is often referred to as
    Ergative(-Absolutive)

27
Pattern
  • One way of visualizing this is as follows
  • Abbreviations
  • NOM nominative
  • ACC accusative
  • ERG ergative
  • ABS absolutive
  • Two types
  • Type 1 Type 2
  • Subj/Trans NOM ERG
  • Subj/Intrans NOM ABS
  • Obj/Trans ACC ABS

So type 1 nominative-accusative language, type
2 ergative-absolutive language
28
Morphological Patterns
  • Recall that in our discussion of morphology we
    examined cases in which discrete pieces are added
    to words
  • I walk he/she/it walk-s
  • John walk-ed to the store
  • I have walk-ed a lot this week.

29
The range of the pattern
  • In languages like English, adding morphemes like
    this performs many different functions
  • Example write
  • write write-s writ-er
  • writ-ing writ-ing-s

30
At the same time
  • We also find cases where there is no overt
    additional affix
  • Past tense wrote
  • This is the pattern in other cases
  • Sing sang sung
  • Ring rang rung

31
Stem-changing
  • The non-affixal morphological patterns that we
    see in English are restricted in scope
  • For the most part, they involve a change to the
    vowel found in the stem sing, sang
  • Otherwise, there is no complex rearrangement of
    the stem form

32
Example Templatic morphology
  • In other languages- we will illustrate with
    Arabic below- the patterns of stem-changing are
    quite complex
  • Arabic uses abstract sequences of consonants and
    vowels to express morphological differences
  • These changes function in conjunction with
    prefixes and suffixes

33
Examples
  • The basic unit in Arabic (and other Semitic
    languages) is a root that consists of three
    consonants
  • ktb write
  • The basic, active form of verbs shows the
    following template
  • CVCVC
  • In general, a template is an abstract pattern
    that guides a particular formation or operation
  • There are many such templates

34
Examples
  • In addition to knowing the consonants ktb for
    this Root, the vowels differ by Tense (and active
    vs. passive)
  • The past
  • katab-tu i wrote
  • katab-a he wrote
  • katab-at she wrote
  • katab-uu they(m) wrote
  • katab-na they(f) wrote

35
Further examples
  • While the active (perfective) above has the form
    CVCVC, another type, the imperfective, has the
    form
  • aCCuC
  • So
  • -aktub-u I write
  • y-aktub-u he writes
  • t-aktub-u she writes
  • Etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com