The Triangular Relationship - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

The Triangular Relationship

Description:

... number of think tanks, congressional staff members and intellectuals Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Armitage, no. 2s in Defence and State Department ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: turunyl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Triangular Relationship


1
The Triangular Relationship of US-China-Russia
and Chinese Foreign Policy Prof. Zhao Quansheng
American University, Washington
DC 2002 AsiaNet / Zhao Quansheng
2
I The Nature of the Triangular Relationship
Parallel Triangles
3
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War

4
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo

5
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo
  • Moscow-Delhi-Beijing

6
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo
  • Moscow-Delhi-Beijing
  • Washingtons ever more dominating role in the
    worlds strategic politics present in most major
    international issues

7
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo
  • Moscow-Delhi-Beijing
  • Washingtons ever more dominating role in the
    worlds strategic politics present in most major
    international issues
  • Two ups two downs system US and China upwards,
    Russia and Japan downwards in political, economic
    and strategic matters

8
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo
  • Moscow-Delhi-Beijing
  • Washingtons ever more dominating role in the
    worlds strategic politics present in most major
    international issues
  • Two ups two downs system US and China upwards,
    Russia and Japan downwards in political, economic
    and strategic matters
  • The two up-countries US versus China

9
  • Different from the bi-polar system existing
    during the Cold War
  • Parallel triangular relationships like
  • Washington-Beijing-Tokyo
  • Moscow-Delhi-Beijing
  • Washingtons ever more dominating role in the
    worlds strategic politics present in most major
    international issues
  • Two ups two downs system US and China upwards,
    Russia and Japan downwards in political, economic
    and strategic matters
  • The two up-countries US versus China
  • Many regional issues have to do with the two
    upward countries

10
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change

11
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change
  • China not satisfied with the existing status

12
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change
  • China not satisfied with the existing status
  • Under what circumstances there will be
    competition/cooperation?

13
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change
  • China not satisfied with the existing status
  • Under what circumstances there will be
    competition/cooperation?
  • Examples 1) Four party talks on the korean
    peninsula (Tokyo and Moscow would like to
    participate!)

14
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change
  • China not satisfied with the existing status
  • Under what circumstances there will be
    competition/cooperation?
  • Examples 1) Four party talks on the korean
    peninsula (Tokyo and Moscow would like to
    participate!) 2) Taiwan Strait

15
  • USAs position is to maintain its status, wishes
    no change
  • China not satisfied with the existing status
  • Under what circumstances there will be
    competition/cooperation?
  • Examples 1) Four party talks on the korean
    peninsula (Tokyo and Moscow would like to
    participate!) 2) Taiwan Strait
  • What are Chinese and American perceptions of each
    other and how they view the third party, Russia

16
II Imbalance of Power and the Bush Administration
Perceptions of Threat from Both Sides
17
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN

18
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN
  • All bilateral relations reflected through the
    parties relations with the US

19
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN
  • All bilateral relations reflected through the
    parties relations with the US
  • USA is the only Superpower with a strategic
    potential stronger than the next seven to eight
    largest medium states together

20
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN
  • All bilateral relations reflected through the
    parties relations with the US
  • USA is the only Superpower with a strategic
    potential stronger than the next seven to eight
    largest medium states together
  • Beijings foreign relations follow the same
    pattern as other medium powers

21
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN
  • All bilateral relations reflected through the
    parties relations with the US
  • USA is the only Superpower with a strategic
    potential stronger than the next seven to eight
    largest medium states together
  • Beijings foreign relations follow the same
    pattern as other medium powers
  • Impossible to catch up to the US, recognition of
    imbalanced global power relationship

22
  • American unilateralism others wish to see
    multilateralism with the UN
  • All bilateral relations reflected through the
    parties relations with the US
  • USA is the only Superpower with a strategic
    potential stronger than the next seven to eight
    largest medium states together
  • Beijings foreign relations follow the same
    pattern as other medium powers
  • Impossible to catch up to the US, recognition of
    imbalanced global power relationship
  • China views the US as its potential major threat

23
  • USA views China as its potential major threat

24
  • USA views China as its potential major threat
  • Washingtons anti-China group number of think
    tanks, congressional staff members and
    intellectuals Paul Wolfowitz and Richard
    Armitage, no. 2s in Defence and State Department
    identify themselves with Japan and Taiwan

25
  • USA views China as its potential major threat
  • Washingtons anti-China group number of think
    tanks, congressional staff members and
    intellectuals Paul Wolfowitz and Richard
    Armitage, no. 2s in Defence and State Department
    identify themselves with Japan and Taiwan
  • Bush announcements with string involvement on
    Taiwan, embassy bombing in Belgrad and spy plane
    incident

26
III Chinas Soft- and Hardliners Patience
versus Confrontation
27
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline

28
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline
  • Two examples Tao guang yang hui (keep low
    profile avoid confrontation, accumulate your own
    strength), jue bu danbao (never become a
    leader)

29
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline
  • Two examples Tao guang yang hui (keep low
    profile avoid confrontation, accumulate your own
    strength), jue bu danbao (never become a
    leader)
  • Very oriental

30
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline
  • Two examples Tao guang yang hui (keep low
    profile avoid confrontation, accumulate your own
    strength), jue bu danbao (never become a
    leader)
  • Very oriental
  • Harliners, particularly among some military
    groups believe that Taiwan breaking away is
    inevitable China must be prepared for a
    confrontation

31
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline
  • Two examples Tao guang yang hui (keep low
    profile avoid confrontation, accumulate your own
    strength), jue bu danbao (never become a
    leader)
  • Very oriental
  • Harliners, particularly among some military
    groups believe that Taiwan breaking away is
    inevitable China must be prepared for a
    confrontation
  • Two generals from the Air Force wrote a book
    Unilimited war, or war beyond normal patterns
    from this perspective

32
  • Mainstream thinking, the softliners, follow Deng
    Xiaopings basic ideas on foreign policy 28
    character foreign policy guideline
  • Two examples Tao guang yang hui (keep low
    profile avoid confrontation, accumulate your own
    strength), jue bu danbao (never become a
    leader)
  • Very oriental
  • Harliners, particularly among some military
    groups believe that Taiwan breaking away is
    inevitable China must be prepared for a
    confrontation
  • Two generals from the Air Force wrote a book
    Unilimited war, or war beyond normal patterns
    from this perspective
  • Beijing government has announced that they do not
    agree with the writers

33
  • Rising Chinese nationalistic sentiment among the
    public reflect the hard line

34
  • Rising Chinese nationalistic sentiment among the
    public reflect the hard line
  • The softliners see that time is on their side,
    trust on economic growth and economic and
    eventual political integration with Taiwan

35
  • Rising Chinese nationalistic sentiment among the
    public reflect the hard line
  • The softliners see that time is on their side,
    trust on economic growth and economic and
    eventual political integration with Taiwan
  • Taiwanese settled in the greater Shanghai area
    2000 ¼ million, 2001 1/3 mill., 2002 ½ mill.

36
IV The New Situation After 11.9.2001 Shifting
of Focus
37
  • The US shifted its policy towards China after
    September 11th

38
  • The US shifted its policy towards China after
    September 11th
  • The US needs Chinas cooperation Korea (nuclear
    issues consensus), UN Security Council (Iraq)

39
  • The US shifted its policy towards China after
    September 11th
  • The US needs Chinas cooperation Korea (nuclear
    issues consensus), UN Security Council (Iraq)
  • The US is still officially keeping its one China
    policy (yet China is still perceived as a threat)

40
  • The US shifted its policy towards China after
    September 11th
  • The US needs Chinas cooperation Korea (nuclear
    issues consensus), UN Security Council (Iraq)
  • The US is still officially keeping its one China
    policy (yet China is still perceived as a
    threat)
  • Security consultations have increased between the
    US, Japan and Taiwan

41
  • The US shifted its policy towards China after
    September 11th
  • The US needs Chinas cooperation Korea (nuclear
    issues consensus), UN Security Council (Iraq)
  • The US is still officially keeping its one China
    policy (yet China is still perceived as a
    threat)
  • Security consultations have increased between the
    US, Japan and Taiwan
  • Florida talks resulting in some kind of a
    semi-military alliance between the US, Japan and
    Taiwan

42
V Beijings Own Strategy Several Tiers
43
  • Russia close personal relationsip among the
    state leaders (Jeltsin, Jiang Zemin, Putin)

44
  • Russia close personal relationsip among the
    state leaders (Jeltsin, Jiang Zemin, Putin)
  • - Shanghai six agreement from April 1996 with
    China, Russia and four other states from Central
    Asia (after 9-11 and particularly after US
    involvement in Afganistan, this agreement has
    lost a part of its importance)

45
  • Russia close personal relationsip among the
    state leaders (Jeltsin, Jiang Zemin, Putin)
  • - Shanghai six agreement from April 1996 with
    China, Russia and four other states from Central
    Asia (after 9-11 and particularly after US
    involvement in Afganistan, this agreement has
    lost a part of its importance)
  • - Arms sales from Russia to China advanced
    jet-fighters and weapon systems

46
  • Russia close personal relationsip among the
    state leaders (Jeltsin, Jiang Zemin, Putin)
  • - Shanghai six agreement from April 1996 with
    China, Russia and four other states from Central
    Asia (after 9-11 and particularly after US
    involvement in Afganistan, this agreement has
    lost a part of its importance)
  • - Arms sales from Russia to China advanced
    jet-fighters and weapon systems
  • - Increases Chinas military capacity e.g.
    air-to-air missile systems

47
  • Russia close personal relationsip among the
    state leaders (Jeltsin, Jiang Zemin, Putin)
  • - Shanghai six agreement from April 1996 with
    China, Russia and four other states from Central
    Asia (after 9-11 and particularly after US
    involvement in Afganistan, this agreement has
    lost a part of its importance)
  • - Arms sales from Russia to China advanced
    jet-fighters and weapon systems
  • - Increases Chinas military capacity e.g.
    air-to-air missile systems
  • - Chinas huge military budget (Should the US
    maintain Taiwan on par with the PRC militarily?!!)

48
- Economic benefits to Russia
49
- Economic benefits to Russia - Russian energy
diplomacy plans of pipelines to Japan,
Manchuria, Korea
50
- Economic benefits to Russia - Russian energy
diplomacy plans of pipelines to Japan,
Manchuria, Korea - China needs energy for its
economic reform close economic cooperation
51
- Economic benefits to Russia - Russian energy
diplomacy plans of pipelines to Japan,
Manchuria, Korea - China needs energy for its
economic reform close economic cooperation B)
India increasing economic cooperation IT
emphasized
52
- Economic benefits to Russia - Russian energy
diplomacy plans of pipelines to Japan,
Manchuria, Korea - China needs energy for its
economic reform close economic cooperation B)
India increasing economic cooperation IT
emphasized C) Southeast Asia Chinas activities
for ASEAN 3 and ASEAN 1, Japans Prime
Minister Koizumi joined immediately China is
still playing the leading role in the regional
economic situation
53
- Economic benefits to Russia - Russian energy
diplomacy plans of pipelines to Japan,
Manchuria, Korea - China needs energy for its
economic reform close economic cooperation B)
India increasing economic cooperation IT
emphasized C) Southeast Asia Chinas activities
for ASEAN 3 and ASEAN 1, Japans Prime
Minister Koizumi joined immediately China is
still playing the leading role in the regional
economic situation D) Northeast Asia South
Korea, Japan and China have very close relations
consultations not only during summit meetings but
also on the ministerial level
54
E) European Union
55
E) European Union - China does not want to see
a two against one situation moving into three
against one
56
E) European Union - China does not want to see
a two against one situation moving into three
against one - Beijing understands thet the EU
is not unified in its interests
57
E) European Union - China does not want to see
a two against one situation moving into three
against one - Beijing understands thet the EU
is not unified in its interests- China not only
plays strategic cards but also economic ones with
its own economic strength Boeing/Airbus in
purchasing aircraft and talks about German or
Japanese technology in the rapid railway system
between Beijing and Shanghai
58
E) European Union - China does not want to see
a two against one situation moving into three
against one - Beijing understands thet the EU
is not unified in its interests- China not only
plays strategic cards but also economic ones with
its own economic strength Boeing/Airbus in
purchasing aircraft and talks about German or
Japanese technology in the rapid railway system
between Beijing and Shanghai- Politics play an
increasingly important role in economics
59
VI Conclusions US domination
60
  • No longer a balanced strategic triangular
    relationship (if it ever was)

61
  • No longer a balanced strategic triangular
    relationship (if it ever was)
  • The US has a dominant role in international
    affairs

62
  • No longer a balanced strategic triangular
    relationship (if it ever was)
  • The US has a dominant role in international
    affairs
  • At the same time, China is doing its best to
    defuse tensions in China-US relations with
    Russian relations and by concentrating on its
    internal priorities

63
  • No longer a balanced strategic triangular
    relationship (if it ever was)
  • The US has a dominant role in international
    affairs
  • At the same time, China is doing its best to
    defuse tensions in China-US relations with
    Russian relations and by concentrating on its
    internal priorities
  • Washingtons priorities are shifting and its
    target is now mowing away from China, which now
    has a break

64
  • No longer a balanced strategic triangular
    relationship (if it ever was)
  • The US has a dominant role in international
    affairs
  • At the same time, China is doing its best to
    defuse tensions in China-US relations with
    Russian relations and by concentrating on its
    internal priorities
  • Washingtons priorities are shifting and its
    target is now mowing away from China, which now
    has a break
  • Russia wishes to regain its earlier status, but
    needs a longer time to have even a full economic
    recovery arms sales and energy diplomacy very
    important tolls for achieving that goal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com