NonLinear Mixed Effects Consortium - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

NonLinear Mixed Effects Consortium

Description:

Define and gain wide acceptance for a complete User Requirements ... Monolix Mango Solutions. Pharsight Uppsala University. Insightful RFPK. The Mathworks ICON ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: davidn85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NonLinear Mixed Effects Consortium


1
NonLinear Mixed Effects Consortium
  • Consortium Activities and Objectives
  • 15th November 2007

2
Objectives of the NLMEc
  • Enable and facilitate the development of MS
    methodologies and software tools that meet
    pharmaceutical industry requirements
  • Define and gain wide acceptance for a complete
    User Requirements Specification (URS)
  • A comprehensive common standards that enable the
    storage and machine-to-machine interchange of
    data, models and related metadata in the area of
    pharmacometrics
  • An interoperable framework system that allows
    seamless interaction between the various software
    tools that are currently used in isolation of
    each other
  • An increasingly growing membership of
    pharmaceutical companies that are aligned with
    the goals of the consortium

3
NLME Consortium Achievements to date
  • Published high level User Requirements
    Specification (December 2006)
  • Published detailed User Requirements
    Specifications (April 2007)
  • Consulted with multiple providers/experts in
    Paris during June 2007
  • Discussed various approaches to achieving the
    capabilities set out in the detailed URS. The
    attendees included
  • Monolix Mango Solutions
  • Pharsight Uppsala University
  • Insightful RFPK
  • The Mathworks ICON
  • Approached CDISC with to consider a collaboration
    in creating standards for Modelling and
    Simulation
  • The NLMEc are committed to integrating with the
    CDISC framework
  • CDISC board are very interested in working with
    the NLMEc.
  • The NLMEc has Presented at PAGE, PKUK
  • On the Agenda to present at AAPS and ACoP in 2008

4
URS
  • The URS represents a wish to unite three major
    functionalities in one system
  • Model Estimation
  • Model Interpretation including graphics package
  • Trial Simulation
  • The three modules to be fully integrated
  • Share data
  • Share models
  • The URS documents are published on the NLME
    Consortium forum http//nlme.org/smf/index.php?to
    pic7.0

5
URS Overall Workflow
Entire workflow to be encapsulated in one system
6
Concept of Interoperability Framework
NLME Framework
Universal Model Reader
Universal Data file reader
models
Data Files
Simple User Interface Workflow Management Traceabi
lity (on/off) Model/Data input Validation Scriptin
g Capability Output Reports Graphical Displays
NLME Interoperability Engine
Monolix Module
S-Plus Module
S-Plus
Monolix
NONMEM Module
BUGS Module
NONMEM
BUGS
Any system can be incorporated into the framework
as a module (i.e. NPEM, R, S, PopED, SPK, etc)
7
NLMEc Roadmap
  • To achieve the remaining stated objectives, the
    NLMEc has devised a roadmap for the activities
    that need to be completed in pursuit of those
    objectives
  • This roadmap is diagrammatically illustrated on
    the next slide, and the plans for each Track
    shown on the roadmap is discussed in more detail
    on the following slides

8
NLME Consortium Plan
PoC Defined
PoC Process Vendor Faciliation
PoC Review
PoC Launched
PoC Presentations
Go/No Go Decision
Standards Definition - Initial draft for
Publication
Manage Feedback
Working Group Formed
Standards v1.0 Published
Standards Refined
Integration with CDISC
Advisory Board Set up
Standards v2.0
Interest?
Work with interested parties to secure membership
Invitation sent
Potential New Member Orientation
Formalise Agenda
Secure Speakers
Agenda Set
Send Invitations
Prepare for Symposium
Hold Symposium
9
Track 1 Proof of ConceptCurrent Situation
  • In Parallel to the URS and Standards work, the
    NLMEc is also embarking on a Proof of Concept for
    the Framework approach. The Objective is to
  • Confirm the viability of the Framework as a
    software tool base
  • Enable the consolidation of independent modules
    onto one platform
  • Use eXtensible Markup Language (XML) as a
    standard format for models, data and documents.
  • Complete by February 2008

10
Proof of Concept
Data
Model
Can possibly use CDISC XML definitions for the
data
Can possibly use RFPK or PopED XML definitions
for the model
  • Proof of concept Step 1
  • Using an existing or a custom set of XML
    definitions, translate the data and model files
    associated with modelling and simulation into an
    XML file

11
Proof of Concept
Data
Model
XML Reader For Monolix
XML Reader For NONMEM
Monolix
NONMEM
  • Proof of concept Step 2
  • Using the output of Step 1 (Model and Data file
    XML definitions), create a mechanism for reading
    the XML data into at least 2 existing software
    systems (NONMEM and Monolix are examples). Both
    XML files must be read.

12
Proof of Concept
Data
Model
XML Reader For Monolix
XML Reader For NONMEM
NONMEM Output
Monolix
Monolix Output
NONMEM
XML Reader For NLME
  • Proof of concept Step 3
  • After successfully running the model in the
    chosen tool, convert the output to an XML format
    and develop a mechanism to generate output
    reports and graphical displays

test simulation rresults
Output Reports
Graphical Displays
13
Proof of Concept Post April 2008 Activities
  • The NLMEc is engaged with a number of
    software/service providers who are participating
    in the PoC
  • Once the Proof of Concept process is complete,
    the consortium will decide on a direction based
    on the outcome. Outcomes include
  • No successful PoC
  • Re-evaluation of the URS and approach to the
    development of Software
  • One or more Successful PoCs
  • Present successful PoCs at a Symposium in April
    2008
  • Tender a Request for Proposal
  • Set up the Consortium as a formal organisation
    with legal status and source of funding secured
  • Sponsor development

14
Track 2 StandardsThe Current Situation
  • The consortium has realised a unique opportunity
    to define standards for model and data definition
    which would enable users to migrate these between
    different software systems
  • The NLMEc has formed a small and focused working
    group on Standards
  • This working group will focus on the development
    of a common standard for the storage and
    machine-to-machine interchange of data, models
    and related metadata in the area of
    pharmacometrics.
  • In Parallel the NLMEc has been in discussion with
    CDISC to see how we could best integrate the NLME
    effort within the overall CDISC framework.

15
Track 2 CDISCCurrent Situation
  • The consortium is in discussion with CDISC to
    create a working group to join the efforts of the
    NLMEc with CDISC
  • The Consortium propose the formation of a CDISC
    working group for Modelling and Simulation
    standards
  • CDISC are interested in a collaboration, having
    discussed the NLMEc at board level
  • The NLMEc are developing an action plan,
    strategy, and milestones to ensure this high
    priority initiative is achieved as soon as
    possible.

16
Track 2 CDISCNext Steps
  • The Consortium will continue discussions with
    with CDISC on forming a Modelling and Simulations
    working group
  • It will then be possible to utilize the CDISC
    methodology and infrastructure to further define
    MS standards
  • Merging into the CDISC framework will provide the
    NLMEc standards with affiliation to generally
    accepted existing standards and will allow
    greater integration with related standards.

17
Track 2 StandardsNext Steps
  • As a priority the NLMEc Standards Working Group
    will first focus on system-to-system language
    standards (similar to CDISC for clinical data)
  • Once the common standard for data storage and
    interchange is adequately established, an XML
    model definition language will be developed
  • The NLMEc will then look for feedback from
    industry, vendors, academia, and other such
    groups to review and feedback whether the
    standards proposed encompass all the critical
    elements that need to be defined

18
Track 3 New MembersCurrent Situation
  • The NLME has currently 5 Members, with a 6th
    pending
  • GSK, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Servier
  • Eli Lilly has committed to join
  • The NLMEc is committed to transparency and
    inclusiveness.
  • Currently inviting new corporate members
  • Meetings - one day a month
  • Annual fee covering project management
  • Non Corporate interested parties will be invited
    to participate in advisory boards and working
    groups
  • This will effectively be a non corporate
    membership, where no fee is charged for
    participation

19
Track 3 New MembersNext Steps
  • Companies are welcome to join the consortium
  • Members of the consortium have contacted known
    industry peers and explain the activities and
    objectives of the consortium
  • In Addition, a general Invitation to join has
    been published
  • Potential new members were invited to a NLME
    Consortium meeting to discuss the Consortium in
    more detail (Barcelona, 26-Nov-2007)
  • The NLMEc will invite non-corporate membership
    for academia and others in the near future (2008)

20
Track 4 SymposiumCurrent Situation
  • The NLMEc plans to hold a Symposium in April 2008
  • The purpose of this Symposium includes
  • Open forum for industry, academic, regulatory,
    software providers, and service providers to
    discuss progress of the NLMEc
  • Opportunity for attendees to view Proof of
    Concept software demonstrations
  • Discuss Progress on standards and gauge whether
    there is acceptance of the initiative
  • Discuss the further plans of the NLMEc

21
Track 4 SymposiumNext Steps
  • The Agenda for the Symposium has been drafted
  • Potential Speakers from the FDA and CDISC are
    being contacted
  • Invitations will be sent to all known interested
    parties, as well as all those signed up on the
    NLMEc Forum
  • The Symposium location and venue will be selected
    and plans for the symposium finalized
  • A full list of attendees and materials for the
    symposium will be published prior to the start
  • It is anticipated the symposium be a one day
    event
  • The cost of the symposium will be shared between
    the participants

22
Other information about the NLMEc
23
How the Consortium is currently set up
  • Legal
  • The Consortium is run as a group of companies
  • There is no consortium agreement in place at this
    time
  • Costs
  • Each member company contributes towards the cost
    of a project manager
  • Currently cost approx 45k EUR / 30k GBP per
    annum
  • Each member company sends a representative to a
    monthly Consortium Meeting

24
Consortium Operation
  • The representatives at each monthly meeting make
    joint decisions about the direction and
    priorities of the Consortium
  • Individual members volunteer to undertake various
    activities, such as update sections of a document
    or do some required research

25
Frequently Asked Questions
  • Why did the NLMEc form?
  • The consortium is concerned with the progress of
    standards, methodologies and tools within the MS
    field. The current technical landscape is
    lacking in many ways and the NLMEc sees the best
    way of addressing this as collaborating with
    industry partners to help drive the advances and
    changes needed to arrive at a situation where MS
    departments have state of the art tools and a
    stable and integrated environment in which to work

26
Frequently Asked Questions
  • How will the consortium handle commercial aspects
    of this undertaking?
  • The consortium has not yet decided whether it
    will be funding any initiatives at all. This
    will depend on a number of factors and will be
    evaluated at the appropriate time.
  • A number of options are open to the consortium
    should all members agree that a joint funding
    initiative should be undertaken, and any new
    arrangements will be fully approved by each
    companies legal department.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com