WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:

Description:

High achieving girls who stay on the fast math track through high school are ... High achieving HS girls are not interested in IT or other engineering careers. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: sarahbb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:


1
WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
  • A SEVEN YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF YOUNG WOMEN
    FROM MIDDLE GRADES INTO COLLEGE

Sarah Berenson, Mladen Vouk, Joan Michael, Paula
Greenspon, Axelle Person North Carolina State
University
2
OVERVIEW
  • Study follows 174 high achieving girls in 3
    cohorts of Girls on Track1 over 5 years
  • Initially funded to study HS girls persistence
    on the fast math track
  • Now funded to study girls interests in IT
    careers.2

1NSF Grant 9813902, Program for Gender Equity 2
NSF Grant 0204222, IT Workforce Program
3
DEFINITIONS
  • High Achieving Girls selected by their teachers
    to take Algebra 1 in seventh or eighth grade.
  • Fast Math Track Pre-Calculus by 11th grade,
    Calculus in 12th grade
  • IT Careers Computer Science, Computer
    Engineering, Electrical Engineering

4
ASSUMPTIONS
  • High achieving girls beginning algebra 1 in
    middle school will persist in the study of
    advanced mathematics in high school.
  • High achieving girls who stay on the fast math
    track through high school are good candidates for
    IT careers.
  • There exists a model of intellectual, social, and
    personal factors that explains girls math
    persistence and IT career interests.

5
METHOD OF INQUIRY GROUNDED THEORY
  • An iterative process of collecting and analyzing
    data to find relationships/patterns
  • Mixed methods of data collection and analysis
    (Creswell, 2003)
  • Generating propositions and testing them in the
    iterative process (Creswell, 1998)
  • Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and
    research design Choosing among five traditions.
    Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
  • Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design
    Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
    approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.

6
PREVIOUS PROPOSITIONS
  • Proportional reasoning is related to algebra 1
    achievement (Clark Berenson, 2000)
  • High achieving girls have high expectations, are
    confident, and feel supported by the families and
    teachers (Howe Berenson, 2003)
  • High achieving girls confidence increases after
    taking algebra 1(Longest Berenson, 2001)
  • Proportional reasoning is related to algebra and
    geometry achievement (Longest, Person,
    Berenson,Vouk, Michael 2003)

7
SUBJECTS OF STUDY
  • Cohort 1 - 1999 are now juniors and seniors in
    high school (n40).
  • Cohort 2 - 2000 are sophomores and juniors (n65)
  • Cohort 3 - 2001 are freshmen and sophomores
    (n69)
  • Represent 24 public middle schools, 8 public high
    schools, and 10 private schools in Central North
    Carolina
  • 130 /- records considered in the data analysis

8
EVIDENCE
  • Proportional Reasoning Scores
  • Minnesota Talented Youth Mathematics Program
    Attitude Measure
  • State Tests Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2
  • PSAT Math
  • PSAT Verbal
  • Math Courses Elected (On Track)
  • IT Telephone Interviews of Cohort 1

9
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
  • Of 119 girls, 83 are on track to take calculus
    by their senior year
  • Cohort 1 n 24/33 80 on track
  • Cohort 2 n 38/42 90 on track
  • Cohort 3 n 37/44 84 on track
  • Of 20 girls taking algebra in 7th grade, 100
    are on track to take Calculus by grade 11.

10
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
Is there a relationship between proportional
reasoning and mathematics achievement over time?
SAS Correlation
Pearson Correlation Coefficients, p-values, and n
for 3 Cohorts
  • Cohort Alg 1 Geom Alg 2 PSAT-M
    PSAT-V
  • 1999 .74 .58
    .53 .66 .70
  • lt .0001 lt .0007 lt.004
    lt .0003 lt .0001
  • n28 n30
    n28 n26 n26
  • 2000 .37 .20
    .59 .45 .16
  • lt .007 ns
    lt .007 lt .009 ns
  • n52 n42
    n26 n33 n33
  • 2001 .47 .30
  • lt .008 ns
  • n31 n37

11
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
What are high achieving HS seniors and juniors
attitudes towards math? 39 telephone interviews
  • Expressed confidence in math ability
    n21
  • Had a great math teacher
    n8
  • Enjoyed challenge in math
    n7
  • Liked math
    n5
  • Used fun to describe math
    n4
  • Felt nervous about next math class
    n5
  • Thought math was difficult/hard
    n3
  • Didnt like math because of teacher n2

12
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
How many high achieving girls did not take
computer science in HS? Why or Why not? 39
telephone interviews
  • 33 had taken no HS computer science courses
  • No interest in computers
    (n16)
  • Schedule conflicts with other electives
    (n6)
  • Schedule conflict with other AP classes
    (n3)
  • Not tied to career interests or college
    acceptance (n2)
  • Courses not offered (i.e. private)
    (n2)
  • Computers dont like me (n1)
  • Waste of time. (n1)
  • Computer/enrichment classes outside of HS (n2)
  • Only 1 of 6 taking HS CS enjoyed the course(s)
  • Java was very difficult (n2)

13
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
What are high achieving girls career interests
in their senior or junior year ? multiple
choices represented
  • Juniors Seniors Total
  • Medicine 10 11 21
  • Science/Math 3 8 11
  • Technology 0 0 0
  • Engineering 0 0
    0
  • Other 12 17 29
  • Undecided 3 1
    4
  • business 8

14
SUMMARY NEW PROPOSITIONS
  • A majority of high achieving girls taking
    algebra 1 in MS will take calculus in HS.
  • Proportional reasoning for 11-12 yr. olds is
    related to HS math achievement.
  • Most HS high achieving girls feel confident about
    their math abilities.
  • High achieving girls do not appear to choose HS
    computer science courses.
  • High achieving HS girls are not interested in IT
    or other engineering careers.

15
TESTING NEW PROPOSITIONS in 2004-05
  • On Track Data from Cohort 2 (2004-05 seniors
    and juniors)
  • Proportional Reasoning/AchievementData from
    Cohort 3 (2004-05 juniors and sophomores)
  • Confidence Data from Cohort 2
  • HS Computer Science Electives Data from Cohort
    2
  • Careers Data from Cohort 2

16
ASKING NEW QUESTIONS IN 2004-05
  • What are the academic characteristics of young
    women and men selecting IT majors in college?
  • What are the proportional reasoning attributes
    of second year IT majors?
  • What CS electives were taken in HS?
  • What math electives were taken in HS?
  • How confident are IT majors about IT careers?
  • What characteristics contribute to persistence
    in IT majors?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com