Title: Paramics User Group at the University of Toronto
1Paramics User Group at the University of Toronto
2008 Paramics North American User Group
Meeting Rutgers University Busch Campus,
Piscataway, New Jersey July 14th15th
Mohamed Wahba, Ph.D. Candidate Researcher and
Lecturer Civil Engineering Department University
of Toronto
2Outline
- Motivation and Scope
- Paramics Applications
- Mixed-Reality Driver-Simulator for Travel
Behaviour Modelling with Information Provision - MILATRAS MIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
3Motivation and Scope
ITS Supply Representation
Challenges of ITS Technologies
Traveler Response Modeling
Supply and Demand Interaction
4Mixed-Reality Driver-Simulator
The objective is to enable credible evaluation of
route choice behavior under various ITS
applications
5PARAMICS Microscopic Traffic Simulator
- Offers virtual reproduction of full-scale traffic
networks - But, lacks behavioral realism
6Driver Simulators
- Allow for the direct testing of real subjects
- But, lack network realism
7Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - IDEA
Integration
Driving simulator
Microscopic traffic simulation
Mixed Reality System
8Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - Features
- Real driver
- Full scale realistic traffic network model
- Ability to execute routing decisions through a
steering device
Mixed Reality System
9Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - Features
- External control of the lateral and routing
movements of a single vehicle - a simulated traffic network,
- a PC steering input device connected to the
Paramics micro-simulator
Mixed Reality System
- Longitudinal control of the driven vehicle and
surrounding vehicles through Paramics.
10Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - System
Architecture
- Translates external acts on the input device
into numerical values
Input Capturing
- Translates numerical values from IC into
movement directions
Communicator (C)
Shared Memory
IPC
Communicator (C)
- Allows for external control of routing decisions
Paramics API Plugins
- Allows for information dissemination
- Controls simulator/driver interface
11Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - In
Action
- Simulator/Driver Interface
Driven Vehicle identified by a circle drawn on top
Attached Steering wheel
12Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
13Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
14Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
Gardiner Expressway en-route divergence node
Pre-trip Decision
Lake Shore Blvd. en-route divergence node
15Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
- Pre-trip Decision
- ? Anticipated Congestion States (Incident
Probabilities)
Pre-trip Decision Node
No Incident (L)
Incident (H)
Incident (H)
No Incident (L)
Incident (H)
No Incident (L)
L
Divergence node
M
H
16Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
- En-route Decision
- ? Anticipated Congestion States (Incident
Probabilities)
Pre-trip Decision Node
No Incident (L)
Incident (H)
L
Divergence node
M
L
H
H
17Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
- Choice Variables
- Travel Time
- No Incident, based only on pre-specified demand
- Incident, based on pre-specified demand
incident timing and duration - Travel Distance, Fixed for each route
- Freeway usage, Fixed for each route
18Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
- Information Provision
- Information Type
- No Info
- Descriptive Info, Gardiner Moving Slowly
- Prescriptive Info, Gardiner Travel Time is
22mins - Information Reliability
- Reliability level, Probability of providing
correct info - For each subject there is a pre-specified
reliability level
19Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform - Tools
Mixed Reality
Map-based
- Pre-trip Choices with no information
- En-route choices with a random information form
and stochastically reliable content
- Pre-trip Choices, with/without information
- Information forms are randomly generated with
stochastically reliable content
20Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application Results
- Recorded data (for each subject, for each trip)
- Chosen Route
- Captured by continuously tracking the driven
vehicles current link. - Deliberation Time (time taken to make a decision)
- Captured by recording the time elapsed from info
display until an action is executed. (Subjects
are asked to press a decision button once a
decision is reached)
21Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application Results
- Collected data for 30 subjects are used in the
- Statistical analysis of route choice behavioral
patterns under different situational/personal
factors - Development of a dynamic route choice
deliberation model based on the theoretical
ground of a state-of-the-art behavioral decision
theory
22Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application Results
Map-based ? Increased Gardiner Expressway Choice
Percentage (G) reflects a tendency to stick to
the same choice without actually deliberating
23Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
Mixed Reality ? Longer deliberation time frames
reflect a more cautious or serious choice attitude
24Mixed Reality Traffic Analysis Platform -
Application
- Main Conclusion
- Mixed reality platform has the potential to
enhance the realism of in-lab simulated route
choice experiments and hence improve the
credibility of collected data - Future Extensions
- Incorporation of external longitudinal control,
such as speed and acceleration control, using a
game type pedal as an input device.
Please contact Hoda Talaat (hoda.talaat_at_utoronto.c
a) or Baher Abdulhai (baher.abdulhai_at_utoronto.ca)
for more details
25Motivation and Scope
ITS Supply Representation
Challenges of ITS Technologies
Travelers Responses Modeling
Supply and Demand Interaction
26Transit Planning Operations
The objective is to advance the
state-of-the-practice of transit service
microsimulation for transit-ITS modelling
Another objective is to enhance the transit
modelling capabilities of Paramics
27Traffic Improvement Projects
Impacts on link flows and bus loads
28Transit-ITS Projects
more efficient, more reliable
modelling framework for with and without
Service improvement technologies
(Automated) Traveller Information Systems
(Dynamics) Service Characteristics
Travellers Behavior (decisions and responses)
29Transit-ITS Projects
TSP
ATIS
modelling of Information Provision
modelling of Transit Signal Priority
impact on speed (and travel time)
impact on passengers response
impact on (of) transit service (passengers
response)
impact on general traffic (e.g. G/C)
Generation Evaluation
30Transit Modelling in Paramics
- Paramics, like many microsimulation tools, has a
principal focus on auto traffic simulation. - For transit demand modeling
- Paramics does not support transfers between
transit routes - Paramics does not support tracking individual
passenger identities - The number of alighting passengers at any transit
stop is determined as a percentage of the
stopping transit vehicle occupancy - The input for transit demand can only be entered
at the stop level, not the zone level - Paramics does not perform transit assignment
31MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
Schedule delay
Scheduled Arrival Time
in-vehicle time
egress walking time
transfer waiting time
origin waiting time
The passenger adjusts travel decisions to arrive
at SAT, while minimizing travel cost
access walking time
Origin Departure Time
32MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
- Individual Passengers are expected to adjust
their travel behavior (i.e. trip choices)
according to their knowledge and experience with
the transit system conditions
Passengers decide about their choices for a trip
on consecutive days based on a mental model of
the transit system network conditions, which is
built over time through experience with the
transit system
33MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
Scheduled Arrival Time
e.g. 900am
Network Structure
715
710
705
700
Origin Departure Time
Network Conditions
34MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
NODE, LINK, ZONE, VEHICLE, BUSSTOP, DETECTOR,
CARPARK, BEACON, LOOP, SLIP, RAMP.
PASSENGER
35MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
36MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
- represents each passenger as an agent/object,
with attributes - accepts transit demand at the zone level, not the
stop level - is capable of tracing every passenger-agent
through the transit network - supports transfers between routes
- deals with boarding and alighting at the
passenger level - provides passenger-specific measurements and
- models the (adaptive) behavior of transit riders
when faced with a departure time choice, stop
choice or run choice
37MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based Approach
to TRansit ASsignment
38MILATRAS ApplicationMIcrosimulation
Learning-based Approach to TRansit ASsignment
- Base-Case Scenario No Information Provision
- Scenario I, Information at Boarding Stops
- Scenario III, Information On-Board
- Scenario IV, Pre-Trip Information
- Travel Time Prediction Model (supply side)
- Information and Experience Integration Model
(demand side)
39MILATRAS ApplicationMIcrosimulation
Learning-based Approach to TRansit ASsignment
40MILATRAS ApplicationMIcrosimulation
Learning-based Approach to TRansit ASsignment
41Advancing MILATRASMIcrosimulation Learning-based
Approach to TRansit ASsignment
- Ongoing Research
- Experimenting with different path choice
mechanisms - e.g. learning methods - Incorporating mode choice/switch into framework
- MILATRAS provides a consistent way of combining
traffic and transit in a simultaneous modeling
framework therefore, it is able to represent the
impact of roadway congestion on transit service
and vice versa. - Future Research
- Extension of MILATRAS for optimal service design
e.g. transit network route design, timetable
design, etc.
42Thank You