Clergy Pensions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Clergy Pensions

Description:

1/60th for every year served, upto a max 2/3rds National Min Stipend ... OPTION 1. Retain defined benefit scheme as now but further modified ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Stel90
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clergy Pensions


1
Clergy Pensions
What they provide What the problems are The
options open to us
2
Current Provision Defined Benefit Scheme
  • 1/60th for every year served, upto a max 2/3rds
    National Min Stipend
  • Lump sum on retiring 3x pension (2x stipend)
  • Death in service
  • Widows pension
  • Cost 39.7 of stipend

3
Who pays?
4
How the Fund is Calculated
  • Rate of Stipend
  • Age Profile of Clergy
  • Projected Life Expectancy
  • Amount of Contributions expected
  • Interest Earnings expected
  • Probable Investment Growth
  • All against expected out-flow of pension payments
    to determine rate of contribution needed to get
    right fund

5
Present Problem
Present rate of payment 39 is not enough 45
required next year 57 probably required 2011 and
beyond
6
What do we do?
  • Find the money
  • Change the scheme

7
Modifications to reduce costs
  • Cap future increases in pensionable stipend to
    RPI
  • Increase pension age 65 ? 68 (for future service)
  • Increase service required for full pension 40 ?
    43 years (for future service)
  • Contract back into Second State Pension

These reduce cost by around 15 i.e. to 42
8
Contracting into Second State Pension (S2P)
  • Consequences
  • Employees will pay extra 1.5 NI (approx 250
    p.a. for an incumbent)
  • Employers will pay more NI but overall cost of
    future pensions is reduced equivalent to 2.5
    off the contribution rate (4.5m p.a.)

9
Contracting into Second State Pension (S2P)
10
Future StructureOPTION 1
  • Retain defined benefit scheme as now but further
    modified
  • Retains as much as possible of existing scheme
  • Most of the pension is still guaranteed
  • Most of the funding risk remains with employers
  • But costs could still go up or down in the future

11
Future StructureOPTION 2
  • Close the defined benefit scheme and move to a
    defined contribution arrangement
  • Part of the pension on retirement is guaranteed
    (DB element)
  • Remainder comes from the defined contribution
    section but amount depends on investment returns
  • Risk is shared between employers and the clergy

12
Future StructureOPTION 3
  • Hybrid arrangement part defined benefit - part
    defined contribution
  • Part of the pension on retirement is guaranteed
    (DB element)
  • Remainder comes from the defined contribution
    section but amount depends on investment returns
  • Risk is shared between employers and the clergy

13
Bishops Councils Proposal
14
The real issue
The debate is presented in financial terms,
limiting engagement with the issue. Underlying
this is a question of the Churchs
Faithfulness
to Clergy and Parishes, driven by a argument of
Affordability
15
Faithfulness
  • Retrenchment from/desertion of parishes by the
    institutional Church
  • Chip, chip, chip away from the understanding that
    the Church would look after Clergy
  • We risk making this worse because of
    affordability

16
Affordability
  • Parishes currently contribute to clergy pensions
    at a rate of 40 of NMS
  • This is a very high level historically and is
    putting a real strain on parish and diocesan
    finances across the country
  • We are now told this isnt enough

17
How the pension works
On retirement clergy take out a lump sum (2)
They then take out 66p a year for 20 years (13)
There is still a bit left over
You pay in 40p a year for 40 years (16)
















18
Is this a fair summary?
  • This assumes the contributions are simply paid
    into the bank and earn inflation rate income!
  • This would be prudent to a fault
  • Flat stipend rates mean wage inflation is minimal
  • Therefore there is no long term problem with
    paying at 40 - indeed it should be a maximum

19
Why are we being asked for more?
  • Complex but component elements are
  • Deal done to split the scheme in 1997
  • Bad investment markets recently
  • Actuarial valuation techniques

20
Bishops Councils proposal will
  • Undo the 1997 deal
  • Enable longer term view to be taken
  • Enable a more reasonable valuation basis

21
Can we afford not to be Faithful?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com