Comparative Investigation of Collaboratories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Comparative Investigation of Collaboratories

Description:

W. Wulf -- '... a center without walls,' in which the nation's ... GriPhyN & iVDGLpeople: Paul Avery, Mike Wilde. Discussants: Charles Severance, Michael Cohen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: scienceofc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparative Investigation of Collaboratories


1
Comparative Investigation of Collaboratories
  • June 18-20, 2003
  • University of Michigan
  • Ann Arbor

2
www.scienceofcollaboratories.org
3
The Collaboratory Concept
  • Collaboratory lt-- Collaborate Laboratory
  • W. Wulf -- a center without walls, in
    which the nations researchers can perform their
    research without regard to geographical location
    (1989)
  • NRC Report
  • Three illustrative areas
  • oceanography
  • space physics
  • molecular biology
  • (1993)
  • Many collaboratory initiatives
  • NSF, NIH, DOE, NASA, etc.

4
Definition
  • A collaboratory is
  • An organizational entity
  • That links a community of individuals
  • Working at a distance
  • On common problems or tasks

5
Definition
  • that contains
  • Electronic tools that support
  • Rich and recurring human interaction and
  • Provides common access to resources, including
    information and instrumentation, needed to engage
    in the problems or tasks.

6
Collaboratory
people-to-people
Communication, Groupware Services
access to information
access to facilities
Distributed, media-rich information technology
Interaction with the Physical World
Digital Libraries, E-Pub
7
NSF ITR Project
  • Sustainable and Generalizable Technology to
    Support Collaboration in Science
  • Sept. 2000 to August 2005
  • 2.4M
  • NSF Grant IIS-0085951
  • University of Michigan, Howard University (Lucent
    Technologies)

8
Principals
  • G. Olson, PD
  • J. Olson
  • N. Bos
  • S. Teasley
  • T. Finholt
  • J. Hardin
  • D. Cogburn
  • D. Atkins
  • M. Hedstrom
  • E. Yakel
  • J. Herbsleb (CMU)
  • J. Trimble (Howard)
  • G. Furnas
  • J. King
  • M. Cohen
  • D. Radev

9
Project Goals
  • Perform a comparative analysis of collaboratory
    projects
  • through invitational workshops that bring
    together collaboratory researchers from around
    the world,
  • Develop of a Collaboratory Knowledge Base
  • technical and social data and detailed findings
    from existing collaboratory projects,
  • Develop general principles and design methods
  • with broad community participation,
  • Test these principles on existing collaboratories

10
Previous workshops
  • 1 Social Issues (June 4-5, 2001)
  • Definition of collaboratory
  • Definitions of success
  • Social processes
  • Organizational processes

11
Previous Workshops
  • 2 Technical Issues (July 19-20, 2001)
  • Tools technologies of collaboratories
  • Capabilities needed by collaboratory users
  • Technology issues facing collaboratories

12
Previous Workshops
  • Comparative Investigation of Collaboratories
    (Sept. 25-27, 2002)
  • Collaboratories at a Glance
  • In-depth studies
  • UARC/SPARC
  • GLR CFAR
  • Bugscope
  • EMSL
  • Cross-cutting themes

13
This Workshop
  • Continuing empirical analysis of existing
    collaboratories
  • Two strategies
  • Collaboratories-at-a-glance
  • Broad survey of whats out there
  • Small basic set of facts about all of them
  • In-depth studies of selected collaboratories
  • Focused analysis

14
In-depth Six projects
  • NEESgrid
  • InterMed
  • GriPhyN
  • iVDGL
  • Alliance for Cell Signalling
  • BIRN

15
Goals
  • What have we learned so far
  • What next?
  • Two-part strategy
  • What next for in-depth analysis

16
Cross-cutting themes From Prior Work
  • Collaboration readiness
  • Collaboration vs. competition in science
  • Bottom-up vs. top-down origins
  • Technology readiness
  • Experience with collaboration tools
  • Infrastructure readiness
  • Both technical and social
  • Common ground
  • Extent of shared knowledge critical in
    interdisciplinary work
  • Coupling of work
  • The interdependencies among individuals

17
Cross-cutting Themes from SOC Analyses
  • What is success?
  • Detailed discussion in June 2001 workshop
  • What are the incentives for participation?
  • Survey study in progress
  • What kinds of collaboratories are there?
  • Taxonomy presented later
  • How do collaboratories evolve?
  • Some ideas based on our taxonomy presented
    later

18
Cross-cutting Themes from SOC Analyses
  • Do collaborations have an ideal size?
  • Collaboratories allow for larger ones
  • How do they scale?
  • What are various organizational models for how to
    structure collaboratories?
  • How does the control and flow of resources affect
    collaboratory success?
  • The money flow the relation to the sponsor(s)
  • How much flexibility should be designed in?
  • What kinds of early commitments?
  • How much flexibility will funders allow?

19
Cross-cutting Themes from SOC Analyses
  • How important are data issues in collaboratories?
  • Data seems to be a central component of all
    collaboratories
  • For what kind of work do you need real-time vs.
    asynchronous interactions?
  • How important is security?
  • Whats the mix of tailor-made vs. off-the-shelf
    tools?

20
Cross-cutting Themes from SOC Analyses
  • How crucial are platform issues?
  • What is the emerging role of middleware?
  • What is the role of emerging infrastructure such
    as the Grid?
  • How does one move from early prototypes to
    production versions of collaboratories?
  • Why isnt there more reuse of collaboratory
    tools?
  • To what extent are the issues specific to science
    domain or are general?

21
Agenda
  • Wednesday, June 18
  • 900 Science of Collaboratories Project
  • Gary Olson
  • 1000 Collaboratories at a Glance
  • Judy Olson
  • 1045-1100 Break
  • 1100 Discussants and General discussion
  • 1200 Lunch

22
Agenda
  • Wednesday, June 18
  • 100 300 Case 1 NEESgrid
  • Chair Dan Horn
  • Presenter Tom Finholt
  • NEESgrid people Laura Pearlman, Charles
    Severence, Gokhan Pekcan, Paul Hubbard
  • Discussants Steve Poltrock, Jonathan Cummings
  • Open discussion
  • 300 330 Break
  • 330 500 Case 2 InterMed
  • Chair Judy Olson
  • Presenter Nathan Bos
  • InterMed people Vimla Patel, Bob Greenes, David
    Kaufman
  • Discussants Geoff Bowker, Mark Ackerman
  • Open Discussion
  • 645 Reception Dinner at the Portage Lake
    Yacht Club

23
Agenda
  • Thursday, June 19
  • 900 1015 Case 3 GriPhyN iVDGL
  • Chair Nathan Bos
  • Presenters Erik Hofer, Gary Olson
  • 1015 1030 Break
  • 1030 1200
  • Chair Nathan Bos
  • GriPhyN iVDGLpeople Paul Avery, Mike Wilde
  • Discussants Charles Severance, Michael Cohen
  • Open Discussion
  • 1200 Lunch

24
Agenda
  • Thursday, June 19
  • 100 300 Case 5 Alliance for Cell Signaling
  • Chair Stephanie Teasley
  • Presenter Nathan Bos
  • ACS people TBD
  • Discussants Gloria Mark, Atul Prakash
  • Open Discussion
  • 300 315 Break

25
Agenda
  • Thursday, June 19
  • 315 515 Case 6 BIRN
  • Chair Tom Finholt
  • Presenter Judy Olson
  • BIRN people Jessica Turner, Jeff Grethe, Mark
    James, Jorge Jovicich, Deron Estes
  • Discussants Jason Leigh, Diane Sonnenwald
  • 600
  • Dinner out in Ann Arbor, arranged groups

26
Agenda
  • Friday, June 20
  • 9 1015 Cross-cutting themes
  • Chair Margaret Hedstrom
  • Presenter Gary Olson
  • Discussants Jason Owen-Smith, Gillian Kerr
  • Open Discussion
  • 1015 1030 Break
  • 1030 Future in-depth collaboratory studies
    which ones
  • Chair Gary Olson
  • 12 Adjourn over box lunches

27
How we will do this
  • Your comments
  • Please make notes, suggestions, other ideas as we
    go on the colored sheets in your notebook
  • OR use the form on the SOC web site
  • OR, email us
  • Dcooney_at_umich.edu
  • Other procedural things
  • Dan Cooney
  • Ann Verhey-Henke
  • Sharon Mahoney
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com