Janus or Judas Leadership and professionalism in the age of neoliberalism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Janus or Judas Leadership and professionalism in the age of neoliberalism

Description:

Offer definitions and distinctions and some thoughts about relationships between ... Romantic or wishful including sloppy uses of the concept community of practice' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: david2158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Janus or Judas Leadership and professionalism in the age of neoliberalism


1
Janus or Judas? Leadership and professionalism
in the age of neo-liberalism
  • Professor David James
  • University of the West of England, Bristol

2
What will I do?
  • Introduce Janus and Judas as metaphors
  • Offer definitions and distinctions and some
    thoughts about relationships between concepts,
    including leadership, management and
    professionalism
  • Describe neo-liberalism and its importance for
    education and leadership
  • Argue that being two-faced can be a helpful
    attribute for leaders in difficult circumstances,
    with positive practical implications
  • Argue that this need not compromise their
    integrity.

3
Who was Janus?
  • A Roman god. There were many Roman gods and they
    were an important part of everyday life
  • Janus was god of doors. A house is only as
    strong as its doors.
  • Janus has two faces. One looks in (or back), one
    looks out (or forward).
  • Janus gave us the name January the month that
    looks forward to a new year

4
Who was Judas?
  • One of the twelve disciples. There are many
    stories, but the most well known is that Judas
    Iscariot betrayed Jesus by identifying him to
    Roman soldiers in the Garden of Gethsemane,
    taking 30 pieces of silver for doing so
  • Religious scholars differ on whether it is fair
    to continue to promote this story and some
    argue that Judas was acting on instructions from
    Jesus himself, who by then needed to transcend
    his earthly body

5
Leadership and management
  • The terms refer to quite different activities,
    though both may be embodied in one person, role
    or even one action at the same time
  • Leadership E.g. having a goal or vision and
    enthusing others
  • Management E.g. getting the right resources in
    the right place at the right time
  • Some writers would identify a series of different
    styles or approaches for both terms

6
Some possible leadership styles
  • Coercive you must do this now!
  • Pace-setting this is the way to do it
  • Authoritative this is where we are going and
    why
  • Coaching how can I support your learning?
  • Affiliative its important we all get on
  • Democratic what do you think about this? (NAHT,
    2001)
  • Transformational leadership how can I build a
    unified common interest? (Gunter, 2001)
  • Distributed leadership how can I get other
    people to lead on matters that interest them

7
Varieties of management?
  • Autocratic, democratic, consultative a
    common distinction between styles that it is
    often suggested managers could adopt to fit
    their personality or the needs of the
    organisation
  • Directing, supporting, coaching, delegating
    (Blanchard)
  • Large overlap with concepts of leadership in this
    how to do it literature on management

8
What is managerialism?
  • It is not management or leadership as such
  • Managerialism is underpinned by an ideology
    which assumes that all aspects of organisational
    life can and should be controlled. In other
    words, that ambiguity can and should be radically
    reduced or eliminated (Wallace and Hoyle, 2005,
    p.9). Wallace and Hoyle also argue that, by
    virtue of having backed a managerialist means to
    realising reform after reform, policy-makers
    have apparently failed to comprehend the nature
    of professional practice (p.10).

9
Competing definitions of professional
  • The adjective/noun distinction - being
    professional versus being a professional
  • Everyday meanings including doing a good job
    and even simply being paid,non-amateur
  • Traditional - functionalist definitions via
    attributes like training, altruism, code of
    practice
  • Critical - A strategy to maximise rewards for a
    specific occupational group, or an ideology
  • Romantic or wishful including sloppy uses of
    the concept community of practice
  • Research-based - showing intensification,
    deskilling and de-professionalisation or
    re-professionalisation

10
Recent research on learning cultures in England
suggests
  • A perceived and unwelcome decline in professional
    autonomy among teachers
  • A clash between professional values and the
    requirements of targets, audit, inspection,
    performance management and funding ecologies
    of practice versus economies of performance
    (Stronach)
  • Mediation, strategic compliance, principled
    infidelity
  • A policy silence and lack of discussion (still
    less, any agreement) about what learning is or
    should be (Coffield, 2008)

11
Globalisation or neo-liberalism?
  • Two definitions of globalisation
  • Ruud Lubbers, a Dutch academic, defines
    globalisation as a process in which geographic
    distance becomes a factor of diminishing
    importance in the establishment and maintenance
    of cross border economic, political and
    socio-cultural relations. 
  • People around the globe are more connected to
    each other than ever before. Information and
    money flow more quickly than ever. Goods and
    services produced in one part of the world are
    increasingly available in all parts of the world.
    International travel is more frequent.
    International communication is commonplace.

12
Are we in an age of neo-liberalism?
  • A trans-national pressure to release economic
    activity from state regulation? (Olssen, 2004)
  • Something that puts into question all collective
    structures capable of obstructing the logic of
    the pure market (Tabb, 2002)
  • Assumption that economic competitiveness and
    social inclusion are two sides of the same coin
    (OLeary, 2008)
  • The faith in league tables is not just a specific
    national obsession, but an example of a more
    widespread structure and belief-system

13
Neo-liberalism and education
  • Commodification
  • Marketisation
  • Consumerism
  • Choice
  • Neo-liberalism fosters the illusion that the
    market is somehow the underlying natural human
    condition(cf. Michael Apple)

14
Leadership as mediation
  • Leadership as the capacity to look more than one
    way and to respond in more than one way?
  • Importance of sharing leadership practice between
    leaders in different institutions
  • Principled infidelity as a leader
  • Avoiding the reduction of everything to
    individual qualities or characteristics and
    recognising that one works in a field, a social
    space

15
Field awareness
  • field is not like a field of wheat, cows or
    sheep
  • More akin to a magnetic field, or force-field
  • Field awareness is a shift in perception parallel
    to when we move from Newtons to Einsteins
    physics
  • It takes us away from seeing individuals as fixed
    in terms of attitude, role, character, interest,
    and towards a cultural view
  • It draws attention to the relational aspects of
    the setting e.g. how each position in it helps
    to maintain the othersand how this could be
    disturbed for good or bad ends.

16
Leadership as mediation (2)
  • How does the leader respond to objectionable
    external requirements?
  • Pass them down without apology and allow them to
    reshape the culture?
  • Pass them down with an apology but still allow
    them to reshape the culture?
  • Reinterpret them so that the established shared
    values can engage with them and modify them,
    thereby consolidating the culture?
  • Refuse to engage with them unless the response
    can be one that staff internally can collectively
    support?
  • Where are you on this continuum?

17
Conclusions (1)
  • Good educational leaders are in a difficult
    position because they are likely to have
    simultaneous allegiance to conflicting sets of
    expectations and values from different
    stakeholders
  • Trying to reconcile these conflicts is probably a
    waste of energy. Instead, the good leader can
    find a way to meet the different expectations
    sufficiently whilst remaining true (enough) to
    other stakeholders
  • This will sometimes involve challenges upwards,
    and such challenges are much more effective if
    they are shared across leaders

18
Conclusions (2)
  • If the leader gives ultimate pride of place to
    the needs and interests of learners, then she/he
    can more easily do battle with the other
    stakeholders when necessary, including the most
    powerful. This is a source of moral authority
  • Good leaders are like Janus rather than Judas
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com