Title: Presentation at the International Seminar
1- Presentation at the International Seminar
- Natural Resources, Development and Democracy in
Latin America - Lima
- December 5, 2007
2Resource Rich Countries Face Special Challenges
- How to get the best deal out of the extractives
industry - Asymmetry of information
- Asymmetry of resources
- State vs. Firms Balance of Power?
-
- How to avoid the sc resource curse and get the
biggest positive development impact from the
resource windfall - EI often negatively correlated with lagging
development - Governance a special problem.
- Sub-soil resources belong to the State. Who is
the State?
3- The Revenue Watch Institute works with
governments and citizens to address both
challenges - Transparency and accountability are key to
success in both areas.
4Revenue Watch Institute (RWI)
- Mission The Revenue Watch Institute promotes
effective - Management of natural resource wealth for the
public good. - Improved public oversight of extractive
revenues, - coupled with targeted assistance to governments
on managing - them, can help turn resource wealth from a
hindrance into an - asset.
- Created to Address the Resource Curse
- Abundance of research showing resource-rich
countries tend toward lower economic growth,
greater poverty, corrupt and weak state
institutions, prone to violence an civil war - About 50 developing or transition countries are
resource dependent, and 2/3 of worlds most
impoverished live inside their borders on less
than 2 a day - Resource-abundant countries like Bolivia,
Colombia, Mexico, Peru and Venezuela have long
histories of boom-bust cycles, extreme individual
wealth combined with wide-spread poverty, lack of
public services and in-equality - An opportunity to do things differently in this
boom.
5RWI Background
- Organization
- Launched as program of Open Society Institute
focusing on Central Asia - Became global and independent policy institute
and grant making organization in 2006 - Based in NY, have office in UK and local
coordinators in all regions - Donors are OSI, Hewlett, NORAD, Gates
- Activities
- Research and publications
- Advocacy
- Capacity-building and Training
- Monitoring, Networking and Coalition-building
- Technical Assistance
- Countries Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyz - Republic, Mongolia, Russia, Angola, Cameroon,
DRC, - Guinea, Ghana, Liberia, Mauritania, Nigeria, Sao
Tome - Principe, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Sudan,
Iraq, - Yemen, Peru, Mexico, Ecuador, Brazil, Trinidad
and - Tobago, Indonesia, Timor Leste, Cambodia
6(No Transcript)
7RWI Multi-Stakeholder Approach
- Local/global civil society-work to build
well-informed grassroots movements for revenue
transparency - Media-work to better inform the public debate on
extractive sector and broader fiscal management - Governments/parliaments-work to provide policy
advice that institutionalizes prudent,
accountable revenue management - Companies-work to improve the transparency and
accountability of their extractive investments - International financial institutions and donor
governments-work to mainstream revenue
transparency in all lending and diplomatic
support for resource-rich countries.
8Priorities
- The Publish What You Pay Coalition (PWYP)
- Global coalition of more than 300 NGOs
- The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(EITI) - Governments, companies and civil society working
together to promote EI transparency
9New RWI Initiatives
- Mainstreaming listing rules, accounting
- Legislative Capacity Building
- Often excluded
- Vital oversight function
- Sub-national projects
- More EI revenues distributed directly to regional
and local governments - Limited experience and capacity to manage large
flows - Big opportunity to increase accountability and
improve public services
10Mexico Sub-National Case Study
- With RWI support, Fundar (a Mexican budget
monitoring and policy NGO) undertook a
sub-national monitoring project in 2007 - Focus on assessing mechanisms for transparency
and accountability regarding the economic and
material resources that PEMEX allocates to
Tabasco state government where have facilities - Analyzed availability of information on payments
at national and sub-national level, scrutinized
PEMEX revenues earned from 2000-2006, examined
how local governments have been spending - Published a series of reports in summer 2007,
highlighting opacity of state governments
management of PEMEXs payments and complete lack
of accountability to PEMEX, citizens or any other
actor regarding spending - Tremendous local and national media response,
calls from Senators and Deputies for change in
PEMEX policy
11Supporting Peru Projects
- Monitoring the Generation, Distribution and Use
of Fiscal Resources generated by the Extractive
Industries - Propuesta Ciudadana monitors nationally and in
eight regions (Cajamarca, Piura, La Libertad,
Ancash, Ica, Cusco, Arequipa, Moquegua) the
generation, distribution and use of extractive
industries revenues. - Regional and national reports to regional and
national civil society and media - Advocacy campaigns for sound policies and
transparency regarding the extractive sectors.
12- RWI with LGI, Propuesta Ciudadana and the Red de
Municipalidades Rurales del Perú will provide
technical assistance to two Regional Governments
and four Municipal Associations or Mancomunidades
to strengthen their capacities in the fields of
transparency, planning and budgeting, so that
resources generated by the extractive industries
are used in a more transparent and efficient
manner. The project will start the first semester
of 2008 and will last for two years.
13www.revenuewatch.org
END
14- Additional materials not presented at Lima
conference follows.
15Publish What You Pay Campaign
- Global coalition of more than 300 NGOs engaged in
campaign to - promote greater transparency of oil and mining
revenues, - so that citizens can hold their governments
accountable for - the use of this income.
- 1. Full extractive company disclosure of all
material payments made to - governments
- 2. Full government disclosure of resource
revenues from companies - (including state-owned enterprises)
- Mandatory Approaches listing requirements for
disclosure of payments by companies listed on
stock exchanges IFI/MDB lending policies - Voluntary Approach Extractive Industries
Transparency Initiative Equator Principles,
Principles on Business and Human Rights - New Frontiers Capacity building for Legislators,
Sub-national reporting, Contract Transparency,
Licensing and Concessions Transparency, Publish
What You Spend/Budget monitoring (everything
from expenditure tracking and analysis to service
delivery assessment)
16Mainstreaming Revenue Transparency Efforts
- International Accounting Standards Reform
Agreement by IASB after two year PWYP campaign to
develop special financial reporting standard for
the extractive industries, once approved will
become law in 50 countries - Ratings Agencies October meeting brought ratings
agencies, investors and issuers together to
discuss incorporating extractive revenue
transparency/EITI into sovereign credit ratings - Companies that make legitimate, but
undisclosed, payments to governments may be - accused of contributing to the conditions under
which corruption can thrive. This is a - significant business risk, making companies
vulnerable to accusations of complicity in - corrupt behavior, impairing their local and
global license to operate, rendering them - vulnerable to local conflict and insecurity, and
possibly compromising their long-term - commercial prospects in these markets.
- -- Investors Statement on Transparency in the
Extractive Sector - Mandatory Listing Requirements RWI and PWYP
working with US Congress on bill requiring US
registered extractive companies to report
payments country by country, similar effort in EU - OPIC/Export Credit Agency/MDBs RWI and PWYP
working with US Congress to require countries and
companies to be implementing EITI to receive
financing/insurance
17Revenue Management Challenges
- Dutch Disease. export booms lead to exchange
rate appreciation, reducing competitiveness of
non-booming export sectors, such as agriculture
or manufacturing. - Equatorial Guinea--one of Africas newer oil
producersillustrates how quickly Dutch Disease
can transform the economy cocoa and coffee have
declined absolutely, and relatively from
approximately 60 percent of GDP in 1991 to less
than 9 percent of GDP in 2001. - Rentier State. oil, gas, and mining companies
provide state an autonomous flow of funds or
rents, no incentive for government to build
strong institutions linking state and its
bureaucracy to citizens through taxation. - Result is weak, non-transparent institutions,
highly vulnerable to patronage spending or
corruption, and unaccountable to the public - Volatility makes it hard to plan, tendency
towards procyclical policies - Political Pressure to spend, especially around
elections and commodity boom time
18Current Revenue Management Challenges
- Rising commodity prices
- Massive exploration and
- development in low
- income countries with little
- to no industry experience
- Growing Dominance of State Companies. 80 of
Global Petroleum Reserves - Mixed role/responsibilities of state companies
can lead to lack of transparency - BRICs
- National demands for greater domestic economic
benefit from resource exploitation meeting
aspirations without killing the goose. - Growing Fiscal Decentralization and Revenue
Influx at Sub national Level
19Sub-national Revenue Management
- Oil gas and mining revenues steadily increasing,
and countries increasingly adopting constitutions
and laws that distribute larger share of
extractive income directly to state and local - In Peru, recent decentralization of revenues
- In Indonesia, producing provinces of Aceh and
Papua receive 55 and 70 of oil revenues
respectively, 40 and 70 of gas revenues
respectively, and all provinces receive 80 of
revenues from mining, forestry, and fishing - Delivery of basic public services also left to
state, provincial and local governments - The capacity of government at this level to
manage these resources is worryingly low - A provincial municipality called San Marcos in
the Ancash In 2006-2007, San Marcos Municipality
has received approximately US7 million. - In South Sudan, more than 95 percent of the
semi-autonomous regions income comes from oil
revenues. No infrastructure and children go to
school under trees meanwhile the south Sudanese
government has received just over 2 billion USD
under the 2005 revenue-sharing agreement - Money disappears without any services being
provided, or local governments sit on the money
because they do not know how to spend it - Absence of transparency creates context where
corruption and mismanagement are more likely to
occur because citizens have no way of knowing
either the amount of revenue or the intended use
of public funds. - RWI launching new capacity-building effort with
several sub national pilots in 3 regions
20Indirect Revenues Corporate Contributions
- Companies setting up special social
funds--jointly managed with the local political
and communal authorities. - Las Bambas copper mine in Southern Peru, where
the Xtrata Swiss company set up a US45 million
fund to benefit the two provinces where it will
operate. - Funds involved end up being as large or larger
than local and regional authorities, considered
private, not subject to planning or
transparency legal mandates - Absence of a well organized civil society, low
local government capacity contribute to situation
where extractive activities benefit companies and
some public officials, not broader population - Ghana has included corporate contributions into
EITI reporting process, other countries
considering the same, especially important for
mining countries - Mining companies interested in greater
transparency and improved revenue
managementoften blamed for lack of public
service delivery when not their job, and
voluntary contributions often go unrecognized by
local communities - RWI sub-national capacity building projects will
engage companies interested in building capacity
of local governments to improve development
policies and planning and coherence of investments
21- August 2007 Pemex announced change in guidelines
for allocations to state governments - Huge turn around from a company that until now
had always said that states management of its
revenues was not really their problem - Pemex has now set limitations on the areas where
funds are allowed to be spent, and will now
demand more information regarding how states
spend their resources which will be made public. - Hugely important in the context of the current
commodity boom, where transfers from PEMEX to
state governments have risen to around 80
million per year
22Burgeoning Issues
- Helping Countries Get a Better Deal for their
Resources - 2. When to Save vs Spend Resource Revenues, and
How
23Helping Countries Get a Better Deal for their
Resources
- Christian Aid's 2007 report "A Rich Seam Who
Benefits from Rising Commodity Prices?"
highlighted grossly inequitable relationship that
often exists between large oil, gas and mining
companies and producing countries in the
developing world - Poor countries such as Zambia and Bolivia,
heavily dependent on extractive taxes and
royalties, receiving paltry sums based on bad
deals largely signed during commodity busts in
the 1990s - Many old PSCs written by industry or by IFIs
during low commodity price era - With commodity boom, these countries are not
recovering a fair share of the now enormous
wealth flowing into the pockets of foreign
companies - Many requests for help renegotiating terms of
engagement with international investors - Because IFIs often played a prominent role in
helping advise and broker investment deals, RWI
acts as trusted broker in some of these countries
to help renegotiate fiscal terms in
well-informed, responsible manner. - RWI staff currently conducting research project
on recent changes in fiscal regimes in select
resource-economies and the impact on investment,
production, and extractive revenues.
24When Save vs Spendand How
- Debate among economists about the save it vs.
spend it choices countries with commodity
windfalls faceno clear practical guidance on how
to maximize the development impact of their
spending - Advice from the World Bank and IMF overly focused
on the dangers of Dutch disease and inflation - Result is policies where poor countries using
most of windfall to finance the US budget
deficite.g. creating a fund that is invested in
US government bonds, while roads, schools,
hospitals in their country go unbuilt - Azerbaijan finance minister complain to RWIs
directorIMF said Azerbaijans absorptive
capacity was so low that it should not spend its
oil money. Response-- if we dont spend it
,Azerbaijans absorptive capacity never will
increase! - Standard IMF and WB macro-economic doctrine do
not provide a means for prioritizing and
addressing the overwhelming menu of development
priorities that African countries, many of which
are post conflict, face. - Also growing Sovereign Wealth Fund debate--
investing oil revenue savings in treasury bills
for low risk and return versus more aggressive
equity
25Recent RWI TA Efforts to Address These Issues
- Liberia
- Assisting government in re-negotiation of
contracts with Mittal Steel and Firestone rubber - Mongolia
- advising various Mongolian officials on fiscal
regimes applicable to mineral dependent economies
including stabilization agreements and general
tax policy - Helped craft windfall tax that has earned GoM
approximately 165 million USD in additional
revenues, proceeds put into a special fund
dedicated 1/3 to creating a savings account for
each Mongolian child, 1/3 to health care and 1/3
as cash support for newly married couples. - Ecuador
- Assisting government in extractive revenue
mapping and developing transparency portal for
public information - Iraq
- Assisted government in drafting petroleum revenue
management law, including revenue distribution
scheme - MENA (Kuwait, Yemen, Morocco)
- Assisting Arab Parliamentarians Against
Corruption in mapping extractive revenue flows,
parliamentary oversight institutions, audit
capacity and follow-up, and building capacity of
MPs to improve oversight of revenue collection
and management
26Thank You!
-
- www.revenuewatch.org
- Karin Lissakers
- Director
- Revenue Watch Institute
- 1-212-548-0352
-
-