Part II Project PLUS (Promoting Literacy in Urban Schools) Michelle Windmueller, Ph.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Part II Project PLUS (Promoting Literacy in Urban Schools) Michelle Windmueller, Ph.D.

Description:

Partnership between University and K-12 (CSULA and LAUSD) ... IWT. Teacher provides. Small Group. Individual Lessons. DIBELS. Assessment. Benchmark. 2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: michellewi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Part II Project PLUS (Promoting Literacy in Urban Schools) Michelle Windmueller, Ph.D.


1
Part IIProject PLUS(Promoting Literacy in Urban
Schools)Michelle Windmueller, Ph.D.
2
Overview of Project PLUS (Promoting Literacy in
Urban Schools)
  • Personnel Preparation Grant
  • OSEP funded (H325P990019)
  • Partnership between University and K-12 (CSULA
    and LAUSD)
  • Specific focus early reading intervention for
    at risk students who are EL and may be identified
    as having LD

3
Components of Project PLUS
  • Partnership
  • Early Reading
  • ELD
  • Assessment
  • Intervention
  • Prevention and Early Identification
  • Special Education Inclusion Program
  • Professional Development
  • Family Literacy Support

4
Goal Prevention and Early Identification
Through Intervention
  • Prevention
  • of reading failure
  • of need for special education services
  • Early identification
  • of learning problems
  • of learning disabilities
  • Intervention
  • specific to student needs
  • based on diagnostic assessment

5
The Building Blocks of Early Reading
  • Language Development
  • Phonological awareness
  • Language experience
  • Writing
  • Function of written language
  • Reading
  • Experience with literature
  • Concepts of print
  • Alphabetic Principle

6
Essential Components of Effective Reading
Instruction
  • Phonological Awareness
  • Alphabetic Principle
  • Fluency and comprehension
  • Oral language development
  • Intensive, instruction for those who need it most

Taken from the California Reading/ Language Arts
Framework
7
BIG IDEAS in Early Literacy Skills
  • Phonological Awareness.
  • The awareness and understanding of the sound
    structure of our language, that cat is composed
    of the sounds /k/ /a/ /t/.
  • Alphabetic Principle. Based on two parts
  • Alphabetic Understanding. Words are composed of
    sounds that are represented by letters, and
  • Phonological Recoding. Using systematic
    relationships between letters and phonemes
    (letter-sound correspondence) to retrieve the
    pronunciation of an unknown printed string or to
    spell.
  • Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text.
  • Readers who are not fluent at decoding are not
    able to focus their attentional resources on
    comprehension.

8
Big Ideas Drive the TrainBig ideas of early
literacy should drive the curriculum and
instruction. And,Big ideas should drive the
measures we use.
9
DIBELS Steppingstones to Literacy
Initial Sound Fluency
10
What is DIBELS and what does it do for us?
  • Assessment of basic early literacy skills
  • Prediction What is likely reading outcome?
  • Look for growth Systematic ongoing monitoring
  • Data drives instruction Use DIBELS to make
    instructional decisions
  • Who?
  • What?
  • How much?

11
Big Idea Phonological Awareness
  • Initial Sound Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by mid-K
  • Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by end-K

12
The Odds of reaching Phonological Awareness
Predicting Phonemic Segmentation Fluency in
Spring of Kindergartenfrom Initial Sound Fluency
in Winter of Kindergarten
13
Big Idea Alphabetic Principle
  • Initial Sound Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by mid-K
  • Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by end-K
  • Nonsense Word Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by mid-1st grade

14
The Odds of Reaching Alphabetic Principle
Predicting NWF in Winter of First Grade from PSF
in Spring of Kindergarten.
15
Big Idea Accuracy and Fluency with Connected
Text
  • Initial Sound Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by mid-K
  • Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by end-K
  • Nonsense Word Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by mid-1st grade
  • Fluency
  • Goal Reach benchmark by end-1st grade

16
The Odds of Reading Outcomes
Predicting ORF in Spring of First Grade from
Nonsense Word Fluency in Winter of First Grade
17
40 on ORF in spring of first grade establishes a
trajectory of growth and progress toward reading
and academic success.
(Good, Simmons, Smith, 1998)
18
A Three-Tiered Model of Intervention
Tier 3 Special Education
Project PLUS
Tier 2 Classroom Intervention
Tier 1 Primary Instruction
19
Project PLUS Model
Benchmark 1
DIBELS Assessment
Benchmark 2
Benchmark 3
Instruction Whole Group Small Group Individual
Lessons Reteach/Preteach
Instruction Whole Group Small Group Individual
Lessons Reteach/Preteach
Instruction Whole Group Small Group Individual
Lessons Reteach/Preteach
Classroom Teacher
IWT Teacher provides Small Group Individual
Lessons
Project PLUS Intensive Phonologic
al Awareness Alphabetic Principle Oral Reading
Fluency English Language Development
Referral Student Study Team
Intervention
20
Kindergarten End of Year DIBELS Results
21
First Grade End of Year DIBELS Results
22
Second Grade End of Year DIBELS Results
23
Professional Development
  • Project Schools
  • Summer Institute
  • Grade Level Meetings
  • Staff Meetings
  • District Level Meetings
  • Paraprofessional Training
  • Special Education Assistant Principals

24
Project Schools
  • 3 Saturdays
  • Session 1 DIBELS Training
  • Session 2 Intervention in PA AP
  • Session 3 Intervention in Fluency ELD

25
Grade Level Meetings
  • Structured Topics
  • Directives from Principal
  • Directives from Literacy Coach
  • Teachers Questions and Concerns

26
Lunch Meetings
  • Interpreted DIBELS Data to
  • Determined who needed intervention
  • Determined intervention groups
  • Determined type of intervention

27
Staff Meetings
  • K- 3 teachers
  • Case Studies
  • Integrating Interventions with Open Court
  • Independent Work Time

28
District Level Meetings
  • Assistant Superintendent of Special Education
  • Local District Superintendent

29
Paraprofessional Training
  • Big Ideas
  • Project PLUS
  • Intervention training
  • How to work with small groups

30
Special Education Assistant Principals
  • Interactive Workshops Offered Districtwide
  • Data driven instruction
  • Data management
  • Data interpretation
  • Follow-up with teachers

31
Data Management
  • 3 Benchmarks
  • Excel Spreadsheets used with Conditional
    Formatting
  • Important to have a data entry person at each
    school site

32
Linking Assessment and Instruction Three Types
of Instruction
  • Benchmark
  • Students are meeting benchmarks and move through
    the regular program
  • Strategic
  • Students are approaching benchmark and may need
    strategic, focused instruction
  • Intervention
  • Students are at great risk of reading failure and
    need specific, individualized, intensive
    intervention

33
Focus on Students in Need of Intervention
Attitude is Important
  • These are students for whom we have not yet
    found the right intervention.
  • Roland H. Good, Author of DIBELS
  • Dont blame the victim. It is a schools
    responsibility to ensure learning for all. We
    dont get angry with a student because he/she
    does not learn. We determine how to teach him/her.

34
Observations
  • Areas of student need
  • Who provided the intervention
  • Activities
  • Focused
  • Student response
  • Student engagement
  • Duration

35
Student Outcomes - Year 3
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
41
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
42
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
43
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
44
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
45
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
46
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
47
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
48
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
49
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
50
Comparing At-risk, No-risk, LD Students
51
Sustainability
  • District commitment
  • Principals buy-in
  • Bull-dog
  • Teacher interest
  • Needs to be high stakes for teachers
  • 100 participation

52
What types of student monitoring systems and
programs do you have in place at your school for
early intervention and prevention of
over-identification of at-risk students for
special education?
53
How are these results and data driving your
instructional program?
54
If you do have data, how have you organized and
used these data for planning of early
intervention and prevention of misdiagnosed
learning problems?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com