Title: Advanced Satellite Imaging Applications in the NPOESS Era
1Advanced Satellite Imaging Applications in the
NPOESS Era
- Joe Turk
- Naval Research Laboratory, Marine Meteorology
Division - Monterey, CA
- www.nrlmry.navy.mil/sat_products.html
- NRL Colleagues Steven D. Miller, Thomas F. Lee,
Arunas P. Kuciauskas, Jeffrey D. Hawkins, Kim
Richardson
2Talk Outline
- Background on Sat-Focus
- NexSat
- VIIRS Day-Night Band (DNB) Overview
- Capability Examples
- Tropical Cyclones
- Hydrological Applications
- Summary/Conclusion
3Audience and Scope
In the wake of 9/11, the ONR requested all Navy
RD agencies to accelerate tech-transfer
The Defined User Their Challenge Their
Requirements Our Task
Navy METOC analysts (e.g., Aerographers Mates)
operating in data-sparse/data-denied regions
Strike planning, making stoplight decision
charts based in part on environmental
characterization
Simple and comprehensive graphical products for
analysis and extraction of salient information
Exploit simple physical relationships (using high
spatial/spectral/radiometric resolution satellite
observations) to isolate key environmental
parameters from a potentially complex scene
4Satellite Focus Web Page
- Co-registered product suite
- Customized image animations, mpegs, mosaic
options - Online image archive
- Satellite pass predictor
- Online training
- Hosted on Secure Internet (FNMOC)
SIPR and DoD-restricted NIPR Access Only!
Page 4 of 27
5Introducing NexSat
- Building on the Satellite Focus heritage, and
under the auspices of the NPOESS Integrated
Program Office (IPO) NRL Monterey has developed
NexSata public web site highlighting
next-generation operational environmental
satellite capabilities over the continental
United States in near real time. - NexSat demonstrates several new capabilities
anticipated from the Visible/Infrared
Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instruments
aboard NPP in 2006 and NPOESS beginning in 2009,
using the current suite of RD and operational
sensors Terra/Aqua-MODIS, DMSP-OLS, and
NOAA-AVHRR, supplemented by GOES. - NexSat products leverage data from NRLs
numerical weather prediction models (NOGAPS and
COAMPS) and the National Lightning Detection
Network.
Page 7 of 27
6Fast Sat Data Turnaround
Terra Aqua
TDRSS
Svalbard
Direct Capture Ground Station Users (X-band)
Multiple Ground Station Downlinks Per Orbit
(K-band)
White Sands
EOS Era (Today)
Uplink to Comm Satellites
NPOESS Era
Mission Center in Maryland
NOAA Pre-Processing in Maryland (L0-L2
Preparation)
Calibrated and Geolocated Radiance-Level Data for
DoD Users Within 3 hours
Calibrated and Geolocated Radiance-Level Data for
DoD Users Within 30 minutes
Interface Data Processing Segment
NOAA Server (NASA GSFC)
NOAA AFWA FNMOC NAVO NRL
7Quantitative Products
Enhancements
NWP Models
ch1
ch4
ch3
Sat1
SatN
Sat1
Atmospheric Correction
x2 Up-Sampling
Example Rain Accumulation R(mm) f(ch1,
ch2,chN, u850, v850, etc)
RGB Scaling
Example Pseudo True-Color from MODIS
One week rainfall accumulations ending 25 Feb
2005 0 UTC from the NRL Blended Satellite
Technique (Turk and Miller, 2004)
- Numbers with the Pixels
- Validation and Quality Control
- Detection Efficiency? False Alarms?
- Fast and Simplified Visualization
8Preparing for NPOESS-Era Capabilities of the
Visible/Infrared Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS)
Page 26 of 27
9VIIRS Channels
Page 26 of 27
10Snow Cloud Discrimination
- The improved spatial and spectral resolution of
VIIRS, leveraging the new 1.38 micron cirrus
currently demonstrated on MODIS, offers new ways
to classify elements of an otherwise ambiguous
scene.
Page 10 of 27
11True Color City Zooms
- NexSat high spatial resolution (250-m pixels)
true color zooms over major U.S. cities provide
users with an VIIRS-quality snap shot of weather
conditions over their own backyard twice per
day.
Page 8 of 27
12Comparing VIIRS-DNB Against DMPS-OLS Nighttime
Visible
- Higher spatial resolution
- 0.74 km vs. 2-5 km OLS
- Higher radiometric resolution
- 4096 vs. 64 gray shades
- Superior temporal sampling
- Every 4 hrs vs. terminator only
- 3-gains for reduced saturation
- Higher SNR
- Calibrated data
- ? The VIIRS DNB represents a paradigm shift in
the utility scope of nighttime visible data
Page 17 of 27
13How Nighttime Visible Works
- Reflection Signatures
- Emission Signatures
14Utilizing Night Time Observations
LEGEND whitesolar illumination, bluelunar
illumination in absence of solar
Northern Hemisphere Winter Moon 70
Northern Hemisphere Late Summer Moon 97
15Understanding the Role of the Lunar Cycle
20041215 (0.24 full moon)
20041220 (0.75 full moon)
20041225 (full moon)
20041230 (0.81 full moon)
20050104 (0.33 full moon)
16Lunar Reflection and Natural/Anthropogenic
Emissions
Low Clouds
High Clouds
NEXSAT Low Cloud Product (IR-only RED Low
Cloud)
- Under adequate lunar illumination conditions, the
VIIRS DNB will provide quantitative information
on cloud reflectance, allowing for markedly
improved cloud characterization beyond IR-only
approaches?carrier ops.
17Nighttime Dust Mapping from Lunar Reflection and
Multi-Spectral IR
Dust Over Africa?
- Lunar reflection of dust plumes, shown here for
enhancement of low level (warmer) bright targets,
will be combined with multi-spectral VIIRS bands
to provide an optimized day/night detection
capability?pilot visibility.
18Nighttime Sea Ice Mapping from Lunar Reflection
- Because reflected moonlight transmits through the
thin Antarctic clouds, the day/night visible
imagery reveals the edge of the ice sheet in
several places indiscernible within the infrared
image?navigation impacts.
19Characterizing Nocturnal Thunderstorm Occurrence
Intensity
- An additional utility of the nighttime visible
band is its ability to detect the lightning
activity of thunderstorms. In the example above,
white streaks from the DMSP/OLS correlate with
NLDN detected strikes?aviation ops.
20Active Fire Depiction
10/26/2003 0424Z DMSP F15
Fires Isolated
Fires City Lights
- Traditional 3.9 micron fire channel detects all
hot spots (active smoldering). Flagging new
light emissions via DNB decouples active fires.
Requires creation of an up-to-date static city
lights mask ?recon/surveillance.
21VIIRS vs. MODIS Degradation
Page 26 of 27
22Interdisciplinary Environmental Parameters
- Aurora detection and intensity characterization
from calibrated DNB data. Polar latitudes? high
temporal refresh to understand evolution in
advance of GOES-R.
Aurora Borealis (Fall, 2001)
- Possible detection of specific varieties of
marine bioluminescence from space currently under
investigation using DMSP-OLS.
Dinoflagellate Emissions
? Impacts to be explored
23NexSat Training Modules
- Online tutorials are designed to orient new users
with NexSat products using simple and
straight-forward illustrative examples, all the
while tying into the general theme of future
NPOESS/VIIRS capabilities.
Page13 of 27
24Hydrological ApplicationsQuantitative Global
Precipitation and Validation
Page 26 of 27
25- Two Major Factors Limit the Quantification of
Precipitation from Space - Revisit Time A single LEO satellite orbits once
per 90 minutes and (usually) revisits at the
nearly the same local time. - Beamfilling The structure of the sensed
hydrometeors is averaged across the antenna beam
pattern.
Example from EOS-Terra morning overpass on June
26, 2003. Sunshine is indicated by the white
shades and the red stripe indicates the day-night
terminator. Note how Terra passes over at nearly
the same local time each orbit.
26Current (10-Satellite) LEO Satellite
Constellation Revisit Time
Color Codes SSMI DMSP F-13/14/15 AMSR-E Aqua AMSU
-B NOAA-15/16/17 TMI TRMM Coriolis Windsat SSMIS F
-16
Revisit Scale White 0 hours Black 6 hours
(shaded boxes represent 15-minute coverage)
27The Satellite Beamfilling Problem
We dont know the spatial pattern of the
underlying rainfall at the time that the
satellite flies over
Satellite movement
But its only raining in this fraction of the
sensors field of view (e.g., 25 mm/hour)
Therefore, when one interprets the satellite
signal (radiances), there will be a systematic
underestimate of the rainfall (e.g, 10 mm/hour)
Satellite system receives an added signal for any
rainfall that falls within this cone (field of
view)
Earths surface
50-km
(not drawn to scale)
28Characteristics of the Satellite Sensor Scanning
rectangular map grid
29Scan-Edge Effects from the Cross-Track
Scanners Changing pixel size changes the observed
precipitation rates
LAND BACKGROUND
scan edges
scan edges
scan center
OCEAN BACKGROUND
30TRMM TMI/PR 15 Sep 2004 0509 UTC Over-Ocean
TMI cant delineate fine-scale structure
PR-estimated precip is displaced from the
TMI-estimated precip due to parallax
satellite motion
31TRMM TMI/PR 17 Sep 2004 0636 UTC Over-Land
TMI cant capture the heavy isolated rain events
(the tail of the rainfall histogram, i.e. the
few big events) that the PR picks up
satellite motion
32NRL Blended Technique Principles
0.1-degree grid map-projection of all data (3600
samples x 1200 lines)
Weight per-pixel instantaneous blended estimates
(blue) smaller as they approach an instantaneous
PMW estimate (red) Time-proximity threshold
decreases with increasing latitude (shorter
revisit at higher latitudes)
single 0.1-degree pixel with an instantaneous
rain averaged to this pixel size
Time (hours) ?
To 1-day Accumulate instantaneous blended and
instantaneous PMW observations 1-day to 1-week
Accumulate 3-hour blended accumulations 1-week to
1-year Accumulate 24-hour blended accumulations
3324-hour Accumulated Precipitation Ending 10 Jan
2005 at 00 UTC (Top) NRL Blended-Satellite
Technique (Bottom) Navy NOGAPS Forecast
34Overall Hurricane Isabel Total Rain
Accumulation Between 9-20 September 2003
Environmental factors limiting rainfall?
35FABIANs cold SST wake crossed by ISABEL max
-2.5 C change observed by drifting buoys.
Region where Isabels rainfall accumulations
weakened
John Hopkins Univ
36- INTERNATIONAL PRECIPITATION WORKING GROUP (IPWG)
- co-sponsored by
- Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites
(CGMS) - and
- World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
- Endorsed during the CGMS XXIX Meeting
- 23-26 October 2001
- Capri, Italy
- Current Co-chairs
- Joe Turk, NRL-Monterey
- Peter Bauer, European Centre for Medium-Range
Weather Forecasting, UK - turk_at_nrlmry.navy.mil
peter.bauer_at_ecmwf.int
37Automated Processing Online and Available to the
World
Work is modeled after the pioneering effort of
Dr. Beth Ebert (BMRC/Australia) http//www.bom.g
ov.au/bmrc/SatRainVal/validation-intercomparison.h
tml Similar validation over Europe by Dr. Chris
Kidd (Univ. Birmingham, UK) kermit.bham.ac.uk/ki
dd/ipwg_eu/ipwg_eu.html U.S. Validation by John
Janowiak (NOAA/CPC) www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/produc
ts/janowiak/us_web.shtml
38(No Transcript)
39www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/janowiak/us_web.sht
ml
40Continental Australia including Tasmania All
Latitude Regimes Jan 2003-Sept 2004 Daily
Correlation between Gauge Analysis and Estimates
15 Satellite Algorithms (blended PMW-IR,
PMW-only, Multi-Precip, IR-only)
4 NWP Models (AVN, ECMWF, NOGAPS, mesoLAPS)
summer winter summer winter
summer winter summer winter
- Wide variety in performance of satellite
techniques - NWP model performance is superior for winter
season - Similar performance in summer season
41IPWG Validation Results So Far (Still Ongoing.)
- 1. Merging PMW IR estimates (i.e., GEO and LEO
satellites) provides more accurate estimates of
precipitation than the separate components can - Two major systematic biases are apparent in the
satellite estimates - a. OVER-estimation over snow-covered regions
- b. OVER-estimation in semi-arid regions during
the warm season - When merging PMW IR data, more accurate results
obtained - when using IR to transport morph
precipitation than to use IR to - estimate precipitation directly
- 4. NWP forecasts generally outperform satellite
estimates and radar - during the winter season over the U.S.
- 5. Satellite estimates compare better with radar
than gauge - point estimates vs. less-direct / spatially
complete - gauges radar
42NRL-Satellite Points of ContactSteve
Miller miller_at_nrlmry.navy.milJeff
Hawkins hawkins_at_nrlmry.navy.milJoe
Turk turk_at_nrlmry.navy.milTom Lee lee_at_nrlmry.nav
y.mil Kim Richardson kim_at_nrlmry.navy.mil
Arunas Kuciauskas kuciauskas_at_nrlmry.navy.mil
www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc_home.html
www.nrlmry.navy.mil/nexsat_pages/nexsat_home.html
Please Stop By Soon!
Page 27 of 27
43Moving Beyond TRMMThe Global Precipitation
Mission
Page 26 of 27
44Occurrence of High Latitude Precipitation
(Distribution derived from COADS datasets)
Planned GPM Core Coverage
TRMM Coverage
1 mm hr-1 is taken as the approximate threshold
between light and moderate rain rate
45Estimating Precipitation at Higher Latitudes and
Altitudes The primary difficulties
are lighter precipitation rates snowy/icy/fr
ozen surface defeats current microwave
schemes surface calibration/validation data are
sparse Complex terrain can induce variations
the satellites miss strong variations in
short distances warm rain enhancement on
windward slopes not retrievable GPM (and others)
have driven recent work evaluating additional
channels evaluating deployment of sounder
channels that dont see the surface
46Global Precipitation Mission (GPM) Constellation
Architecture
Core Reference Satellite (similar to TRMM)
GPM Era
NPP (back up)
GPM Core Calibration-Reference
NPOESS-3
(ATMS)
(CMIS)
NASA-Partner
(GMI , Ku/Ka-DPR)
DMSP-F20
b
TRMM Era
(GMI)
(SSMIS)
METOP (back up)
TRMM
EGPM
NPOESS-2
DMSP-F19
Satellites of Opportunity
AQUA
DMSP-F16/18
(CMIS)
(AMSU)
Dedicated Constellation Members
(EMMR , Ka-NPR)
(SSMIS)
DMSP-F17
CORIOLIS
NPOESS-1
Megha Tropiques
(CMIS)
(MADRAS)
GCOM-B1
FY-3
AQUA (back up)
(PMWR)
(AMSR-F/O)
(AMSR-E)
47CRL Dual Frequency (13.6,35 GHz)Ku-Ka Band Radar
(DPR)
Measurable range by 35GHz radar
Measurable range by 14GHz radar
DPR radar will measure intense rain in tropics
and weak rain snow in mid/ high-latitudes
DSD using differential reflectivity
tropical rain
mid- high- latitude rain snow
Frequency
strong rain
weak rain snow
Rainrate
new measurable range by addition of 35GHz radar
48Continental Australia including Tasmania All
Latitude Regimes Jan 2003-Sept 2004 Bias Score
between Gauge Analysis and Estimates
15 Satellite Algorithms (blended PMW-IR,
PMW-only, Multi-Precip, IR-only)
4 NWP Models (AVN, ECMWF, NOGAPS, mesoLAPS)
summer winter summer winter
summer winter summer winter
Bias Score (hits false alarms)/(hits
misses) Range 0 to infinity Indicates
whether the system has a tendency to
underforecast (biaslt1) or overforecast (biasgt1)
49- A satellite precipitation algorithm validation
and intercomparison project - Conducted by The International Precipitation
Working Group (IPWG) - Co-sponsored by the Global Precipitation
Climatology Project (GPCP) - Routine daily validation of several satellite
precipitation algorithms against daily rain gauge
analyses was begun in February 2003 at the
Australian Bureau of Meteorology - The NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) began a
similar validation of algorithms over the United
States starting in May 2003, followed by a
European validation in mid 2004 - Most of the algorithms currently being validated
are "operational" or "semi-operational", meaning
that they are run routinely in near-real time and
their estimates are available to the public via
the web or FTP - Short-term rain forecasts from a small number of
numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are
also verified for comparison
50Research Baseline Activities
- Enlisting of lunar model for assignment of
top-of-atmosphere downwelling lunar spectral flux
as a function of time, location, and lunar phase
(e.g., new, quarter, half, full) - Development of a forward model for VIIRS DNB ?
radiances for quantitative applications. - Obtaining a near real-time feed of NPP/VIIRS-DNB
datapossible through NOAA/NASA/DoD NRTPE. - Incorporation of DNB satellite demonstration
products in the multi-sensor/model-fusion NexSat
near real-time processing framework.
NRTPE
51MODIS Views of Tropical Cyclones
Click here for NRL TC-Web
Hurricane Isabel 1-km, 500-m, 250-m zoom