Title: Reactor Accidents
1Reactor Accidents
2Loss of Cooling Accidents
- Light Water
- SL-1
- Millstone 1
- Browns Ferry 1 and 2
- Three Mile Island 2
- Ginna
- Mihama 2
- Chernobyl
- Heavy Water
- NRX
- Lucens
- Gas Cooled
- Windscale
- St. Laurent
- Hunterston B
- Hinckley Point B
- Liquid Metal
- EBR-1
- Enrico Fermi
- Will be Covered in Upcoming Lectures
3Stationary Low-Power Plant No. 1 (SL-1) Accident
- January 3, 1961
- 3 MW
- National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho
- Control Rods Manually Removed
- Reached 20,000 MW in 0.01 s
- Destroyed Core, Melted Fuel, Steam/Pressure
Explosion - Killed the 3 Military Personnel
- Need Control Rod Interlocks
- Uncontrolled Reactors are Very Dangerous
4Millstone 1 Accident
- September 1, 1972
- 660 MWe BWR
- Malfunction if Water Purification Systems
- Seawater Corrosion to Primary Coolant Loop
- Repaired and Resumed Operation
- No Injuries or Radiation Release
- Need Alternative Cooling Methods
5Browns Ferry 1 and 2 Fire
- March 22, 1975
- Three 1095 MWe BWRs, Alabama
- Worker Performing Leak Tests with a Candle
Started a Fire in the Walls - 7 Hours, 10M 1 year Repair
- Burned 2000 Cables
- Alternative Cooling Methods Needed for Core
- No Serious Injury or Radiation Release
- Segregation of Components and Wiring for Safety
and Control
6Ginna Incident
- January 25, 1982
- 490 MWe PWR, New York State
- Loose Metal Object Vibrated and Damaged Steam
Generator Tubes - Delayed Coolant Response
- Release of Some Radiation (Noble Gases)
- No Injuries
7Mihama-2 Incident
- February 9, 1991
- 500 MWe PWR, Japan
- Steam Generator Tube Rupture
- Fatigue Failure
- Corrosion Debris
- Improper Installation of Antivibration Support
- Small Release of Radioactive Gas
- No Injuries
8NRX Incident
- December 12, 1952
- 40 MWt CANDU, Chalk River, Canada
- Operator Removed Too Many Control Rods
- Supervisor Had Them Returned but They Didnt
Complete Enter the Core - Power Rose to 60 90 MWt
- Low Coolant Flow for Testing
- Core Melted and Ruptured
- 10,000 Ci Fission Products Dumped in 1M Gallons
Water - Need Proper Control Rod Operations
9Lucens Incident
- January 21, 1969
- 30 MWt, Lucens, Switzerland
- Combined Magnox and Heavy Water Reactor
- Corrosion of Fuel Rod Rupture
- Molten Cladding Blocked Coolant
- Pressure Burst
- Need Better Understanding of Chemical
Interactions, Reactor Characteristics, and
Monitoring
10Windscale Fire
- October 7-10, 1957
- Plutonium Production
- Heating to Anneal Graphite Moderator Defects
- Fuel Overheated
- Released 20,000 Ci I-131 and Noble Gases
- Milk Production Stopped for 6 weeks
- Estimated Increase of 30 Cancer Deaths for Every
1M Cancer Deaths - Filter Trapped Some of the Release
11St. Laurent Fuel Meltdown
- October 17, 1969
- 500 MWt, MagnoxSt. Laurent, France
- Improper FuelLoading, Charging Machine Override
- Blocked Coolant Channel
- Molten Fuel
- No Radiation Release Beyond Core
- No Injuries
- 1 year to Cleanup and Modify the Reactor
- Heat Removal is Critical
12Hunterston B Seawater Problem
- October 11, 1977
- AGR, Hunterston, Scotland
- Temporary Testing with Pure Water
- CO2 Acidified Water to Cause Corrosion
- 8000 L Seawater Entered Reactor Vessel
- Repairs Cost 13M and 28 months
- Temporary Modifications Should be Properly
Analyzed
13Hinkley Point B Fuel Damage
- November 19, 1978
- AGR
- Fuel Loading During Reactor Operation
- Vibrations and Pressure Increased Cladding Cracks
- Fuel and Heat Removal Failure During Operation
- On-Load Refueling Performed at Low Power
14Experimental Breeder Reactor I (EBR-1) Meltdown
Accident
- Novemeber 29, 1955
- First Reactor to Generate Electricity
- High Temperature Effects Caused Fuel Pins to Bow
Closer Together and Increase Reactivity - Melted 40 of the Core
- Fast Reactors Built to Expand Rather than Contract
15Enrico Fermi Fuel Melting Incident
- October 5, 1966
- 200 MWt LMFBR, Lagoona Beach, Michigan
- Guide Plate became Loose and Blocked 2 Fuel
Channels - Fuel Melted
- No Injury or Outside Release of Radiation
- 10,000 Ci Fission Products Released to Sodium
Coolant - Need Careful Analysis of Parts in a Reactor
16Examples and Problems 5.1
- Decay Heat Removal using PORVs
- How Many PORVs are Needed to Release Decay Energy
from a 4000 MWt PWR in 100 seconds after
Shutdown? - Valve Area 0.002 m2
- Decay Heat Fraction is 3.2 of Power (Table 2.2)
- Maximum Release Rate is 17,000 MW/m2 (Section
4.3.2) - Decay Heat Rate is 128 MW
- Flow Area Required 0.0075 m2
- Therefore, 4 PORVs Would be Required
17Examples and Problems 5.1
- Other Problems using Same Equations
- Evaluate the Problem for Different Lengths of
Time, Operational Power Levels, Flow Areas, or
Number of PORVs - Additional Analysis
- If 1 PORV Valve Remained Closed, How Long Would
it Take to Remove the Decay Heat? - Re-evaluate the Problem if the Efficiency of
Energy Release for Each PORV is Reduced
18Examples and Problems 5.2
- Evaporation of Coolant
- A 3800 MWt PWR is half uncovered due to a small
LOCA event what is the rate of becoming
uncovered at 1 h after shutdown? - Void fraction 0.5
- Fuel occupies 40 of core
- Core diameter, d 3.6 m
- Core length, l 5 m
- Pressure, P 85 bars
- Assume uniform heat flux across core
19Examples and Problems 5.2
- (V/l)core (pr2)(1-0.5)(1-0.4) 3.054 m2
- Using Table 2.2 (Heat from core 1.4)
- 3800 MW 1.4 ½ core 2.66 x 107 W
- Latent heat of evaporation at 85 bars
- 1.4 x 106 J/kg
- Evaporation rate 26.6/1.4 19 kg/s
- Density of water at 85 bars
- 713 kg/m3
20Examples and Problems 5.2
- Volume evaporation rate 0.0266 m3/s
- Uncovery rate
- Volume evap rate / volume of core per length
- U 31.4 m/h
21Examples and Problems 5.2
- Other Problems using Same Equations
- What if heat generation isnt uniform across the
core? - How and why would the evaporation rate change
with fluid level in the core? - Additional Analysis
- What if the heat generation changed across the
cross-sectional area of the core as well?