Title: Patient Identification Part 2
1Patient Identification (Part 2)
29th September 2009
Presenters Dafydd Thomas Mark Thomas
2NHS Reality
3NHS Reality
4Mrs Jones Reality
NHS Reality - MITU
5 6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10Mrs Jones Utopia
11The Solution
- Every patient must be uniquely identified in an
unambiguous manner. - This identification must be tied to all requests,
medications, procedures, devices etc. applied to
the patient.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in
Healthcare (2008). Technology Solutions to
Patient Misidentification. Report of Review.
12NPSA Recommendations
- Use the NHS number as the national patient
identifier on - Patient correspondence
- Patient notes
- Patient wristbands
- Electronic records
- Educate patients on its use
- Primary Care organisations to inform new patients
of their number
13NHS Number First name Last name DOB Sex
NPSA Standard
14First name Baby All Last name Thomas gtOne D
OB 21 June 2007 All Sex Male 50 NHS
Number N4Babies
15The Times Monday 28 September 2009
16To err is human but to really screw things up
takes a computer
17Safety System errors Aviation Design
F1 Technology Tescos Human Error/Violatio
n
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23The Requirement
- Identify a patient unambiguously using Gold
Standard demographic - Use identification for all patient related
activity - Link electronic records held in different
systems, accurately unambiguously
Prerequisite to the development of patient
centric record e.g. Welsh Clinical Portal
24IHC Projects
- Duplicate Records Project
- 5.5m invested from 2004 2008
- Reduction in duplicate records
- Reduction in missing NHS numbers
25Duplicate Records Results
26IHC Projects
- Bar code Labelling Project
- Barcode label printers supplied to GP surgeries
- Used for Pathology test requests
- Correct, legible patient information on request
forms - Patient identifiers scanned into hospital systems
eliminating manual entry
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Labelling Project Results
30Background
- Multiple records
- and identifiers for same patient
- Separate departmental systems
-
- Separate manual (error prone) registration
processes
(Multiple records and identifiers for same
patient)2
Trust Merger
31Merger Consequences - ABM
- 1 Patient with records potentially in
- 2 PAS
- 2 Pathology
- 2 Radiology
- 2 Theatres
- 4 Pharmacy Systems...
32Scale of the Problem - ABMU
- 2 PAS Duplicate Potential Duplicates
- iPM
- 170,000 duplicates
- 40,000 potential duplicates
- PIMS
- 5,000 duplicates
- Across both PASs
- 100,000 duplicates
- 50,000 potential duplicates
- 1 Person resolving duplicates
- 3.6 years to resolve potential duplicates
- 54 years to amalgamate case notes of duplicate
records
33Impact of the Problem
- Clinicians presented with long list of results
for patients that could be the same - 2000 David Jones
- 25 of Stephen Davies share date of birth with
another Stephen Davies - 15 of records with surname Jones, Davies,
Williams, Thomas or Evans
34BBTS into Google
- British Blood Transfusion Society
35BBTS into Google
- Big Bad Toy Store
- Bethesda by the Sea (Chapel - USA)
- British Blood Transfusion Society
36Impact of the Problem
- Patient information missing (or incorrect) when
making key clinical decisions - Unnecessary tests re-ordered for patients as
results contained in other unknown records
37Identification across Wales
- Identify patients across Wales
- Regional/National Pathology services
- Patients moving across boundaries
- (Welsh) Clinical portal
- Local identifiers not enough may conflict with
other organisations identifiers - The NHS number is only part of the solution
38NHS number
- Unique number for every person registered with a
GP practice in England and Wales - Welsh Demographic Service (WDS) is the master
store for Wales fed from GP systems - Use recommended by NPSA from Sept 09
39(No Transcript)
40NHS number
- Issues with relying solely on the NHS Number
- Manually input into disparate clinical systems
- 814 pathology radiology results where same
hospital number has gt1 NHS number - Not always available - 50,000 records without NHS
no. in results reporting database - Blood Gas Scenario
41(No Transcript)
42Requirements a reminder
- Link patient based information across different
departments/organisations (including merged
organisations)/Primary Care - Provide Gold Standard demographic record in
order to - Safely consistently present all relevant
information to clinicians involved in care
43Creating the Gold Standard
- Patient search
- Consistent process
- Staff training/awareness
- Registration obtain NHS no. from WDS in real
time - Batch trace with WDS to ensure full NHS no.
completeness - Utilise automatic address searching tool
44Creating the Gold Standard 2
- Amend demographics at PAS level
- Shared to other systems
- Up to date demographic available to all
- No manual entry of numbers
- Bar coded labels
- Electronic test requesting
45eMPI What it does
- Identifies and automatically links duplicate
records - Identifies potential duplicates
- Enables potential duplicates to be managed in a
live environment protecting the Gold Standard - Signposts to records in other systems
- Shares Gold Standard demographics with other
systems - Enables safer workflow between departments
46Welsh eMPI
- IHC procuring one common eMPI
- Will be implemented 6 times in LHBs same
- Prerequisite to safely identifying patients
across the PAS, other systems and service - Powers local systems safely
- Powers the WCP - which pulls all the patients
data based on their ID from the different systems
into a common view of the record - Contract signed November 09
47eMPI
- This is only the
- End of the beginning
48The Bro Morgannwg MPI
- MPI linked to PAS and clinical systems
- Matching algorithm determines definite and
potential duplicate records - Results
- 45,000 duplicate records reduced to 5,000
duplicates - 40,000 PAS records ( case notes)
amalgamated/volumes linked - 7 potential duplicates (4 definites) identified
and resolved each day - 1 patient, 1 record
- Gold standard maintained
49(No Transcript)
50Daily Duplicate Registrations
Average 4 per day
51Key Principles
- New consistent
- Standards need to be in place for patient ID
across all departmental systems - Application of these standards requires
significant changes in departmental workflow - Adherence to these standards needs to be
proactively monitored and assured
52Key Principles 2
- Ongoing resource to be allocated
- Reallocation of resource needed to provide
sustainable robust patient identification
processes Safety and Financial Reasons - Information must be in real time to maintain gold
standard and support operational processes
53The How to Guide
- Reducing harm as a result of patient
identification errors - Achieving the Gold Standard in patient
identification
54Driver Diagram
- Support front-line staff to reduce the
opportunity for patient identification errors - Develop back room functions to reduce the risk
of patient identification errors and provide
clinical staff with a more complete record of care
Page 2
55Process Measures
- Compliance to searching process
- Proportion of patients with standardised
bar-coded wristbands - Number of new duplicates created per day
Page 3
56Outcome Measures
- Number of cases of harm due to patient
misidentification errors - Number of cases of harm where critical
information is missed as patient information is
unlinked across systems
Page 3
57Driver 1
- Support front-line staff to reduce the
opportunity for patient identification errors - 6 interventions
- Redesign patient searching process
- Redesign patient registration process
- Redesign birth death notification processes
- Promote the use of NHS Number as unique patient
identifier - Identify all patients using standardised
bar-coded wristbands - Use NHS Number when requesting tests and other
services
Page 7
58Page 9
59Driver 2
- Develop back room functions to reduce the risk
of patient identification errors and provide
clinical staff with a more complete record of
care - 7 interventions
- Implement an Enterprise Master Patient Index
(EMPI) - Identify and resolve potential duplicate and
duplicate patient records - Amalgamate duplicate records
- Link disparate systems
- Batch trace NHS Number for existing records
- Provide a patient-centric view of information
- Maintain Gold Standard in patient identification
Page 15
60Page 16
61Appendix 1
- Achieving change in practice
- Getting started
- Use the Model for Improvement
- Forming the Team
- Setting Aims
- Barriers that may be encountered
- Measurement
Page 19
62Conclusion
- Organisations need to review their administrative
processes and patient identification policies to
minimise risk of duplicate records - An Enterprise Master Patient Index is essential
to managing patient records safely - A successful project has already been completed
in Wales, so it is possible for other
organisations to implement similar solutions - The 1000Lives Campaign methodology can assist
organisational teams implement their local
solutions successfully