Title: The Great Exchange and the Atlantic World
1The Great Exchange and the Atlantic World
2What are the pieces of the new Atlantic economy?
How can it be addressed as symbiotic?
- Slavery is only one part of the Atlantic economy.
- The slave ship the Hannibal did not turn a
profit, but was an important piece of the big
picture of the Atlantic trade network. - The Atlantic System was comprised of many things
that relate to the mercantilist and capitalist
systems and the changes that developed between
government and individual private investors. - There is a relationship between African and
European merchants and elites in forming a
working economic relationship. - Finally, the development of the plantation system
and the choice of growing a single cash crop on
the plantation gave rise to the Atlantic slave
trade and allowed European traders to participate
in the global market place more effectively and
profitably.
3How did the Saharan slave trade differ from the
Atlantic slave trade?
- While the number of enslaved Africans in the
Saharan trade was smaller than in Atlantic trade,
it was still substantial. - Indigenous Muslim states controlled both sides of
the Saharan trade, although most of the slaves
were non-Muslim African captives. - Slaves served different purposes in Muslim
societies than in the Americas most were
servants others performed state and military
functions. - The Atlantic slave trade was heavily male, the
Saharan slave trade heavily female.
4What is the Great Circuit?
- The flow of goods and people between Europe,
Africa, and the Americas had many variations. - Some trading patterns were three-sided, or
triangular. Others were two-sided. - For example, New England shipped foodstuffs and
livestock to the West Indies in return for rum
and molasses. - Overall, goods flowed from Europe to Africa,
where they were exchanged for many different
items, as well as slaves. - Slaves were carried to the Americas, where they
were sold or exchanged. - Some details of the dreaded Middle Passage should
be provided by the students. - The primary products carried from the Americas to
Europe were sugar, coffee, cacao, rum, molasses,
and tobacco. - Besides this larger pattern, the Atlantic Circuit
had many smaller variations. Students should
acknowledge that, while large numbers of Africans
were victims of these patterns, many African
merchants and rulers were able to profit from
participating in the Atlantic trade.
5Discuss the interactions between Europeans and
Africans in the Atlantic slave trade.
- Europeans were initially interested in trade, not
in colonizing and controlling Africa. - It was African kings and merchants who controlled
the trade, not Europeans. Africans did not barter
people for cheap goods, as is often described. - They demanded high-quality goods that they could
not produce, or at least could not produce in
large quantities. African gold, ivory, and timber
remained important features of European trade. - African governments controlled both the price and
the quantity of slaves and could unilaterally
suspend the trade when they wished. - The trade differed widely from region to region
within Africa, depending on both the African and
European nations that were involved.
6What are the various theories as to why African
slave labor was so widely used in the Americas?
Which theory is most commonly accepted at
present?
- There are several theories.
- A once-popular theory held that Africans were
more resistant to disease, as well as better
suited to heavy work in tropical climates. - Another held that use of Africans was motivated
primarily by prejudice. - Eric Williams has refuted that particular theory
with his famous quote that Slavery was not born
of racism rather, racism was the consequence of
slavery. - Another assertion was that slaves were cheap.
- They were not, but since white Europeans
indentures were relatively brief, the high cost
of slaves could be minimized over a longer period
of time. - Rising sugar prices also meant that sugar growers
could afford more expensive African slaves.
7How do the European mercantile and capitalist
systems compare?
- Mercantilism comprised the policies of European
states to promote overseas trade and defend
national interests. - Capitalism grew as an internal European system,
involving the management of large financial
resources through banks, stock exchanges, and
trading companies. - Mercantilist policies that supported capitalism
included chartered companies, tariffs, and trade
laws. - The largest capitalist overseas investments were
in the sugar plantations of the Caribbean. - To defend their West Indian plantation colonies
from other countries European states used
military actions as well as protective laws.
8What was the life of a slave like on a West
Indian sugar plantation in the eighteenth
century?
- The slaves planted and weeded sugar cane as well
as harvested, milled, and refined the sugar. - There was a gender imbalance of slave populations
and sexual divisions of labor on the plantation. - Low reproductive rates and high numbers of new
slave imports were an integral part of slaves
family and social lives. - Home lifeincluding the period of seasoning,
diet, health, nutrition, Sunday markets,
marriage, child rearing, religion, and life
expectancyare variables yet become cultural
norms for the slaves.
9Who were the free people in West Indian society
in the eighteenth century and how were they
socially divided?
- Three groups of free people
- the wealthy whites (grands blancs)
- the poorer whites (petits blancs)
- and free blacks.
- Aside from noting the more obvious distinctions
between the wealthy white plantocracy, race was a
distinction in the divisions. - Legal restrictions on free blacks, such as the
controls on landownership and participation in
the militia and government, were important
distinctions as well. - The occupations of the different groups of free
people, the separation by class, the
possibilities for social advancement, and their
various routes to freedom for blacks were a
factor in these social divisions.