Electron Beam Physics for Total Skin Irradiation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Electron Beam Physics for Total Skin Irradiation

Description:

Skin tumors phase - Red-violet raised lumps (nodules) appear and may be dome ... Skin involvement is characteristic of monoblastic and myelomonocytic leukemias ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:934
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electron Beam Physics for Total Skin Irradiation


1
Electron Beam Physics for Total Skin Irradiation
  • Faisal Siddiqui, Ph.D.
  • July 23, 2008

2
Total Skin Electron Beam TherapyApplications
  • Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (Mycosis Fungoides,
    Sezary Syndrome)
  • Leukemia Cutis
  • Kaposis Sarcoma
  • Scleromyxoedema (Lichen myxoedematosus)

3
Mycosis Fungoides
  • Most common form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
  • In US, 1000 new cases per year.
  • Men twice as often as women, and is more common
    in African-Americans than in Caucasian.
  • Most common age is 50.
  • Progression in phases
  • Patch phase - The skin has flat, red patches
    very itchy. plaques).
  • Skin tumors phase - Red-violet raised lumps
    (nodules) appear and may be dome-shaped (like a
    mushroom) or be ulcerated.
  • Erythroderma stage - Large red areas that are
    very itchy and scaly and thickening of skin
    folds.
  • Lymph node stage Spread to lymph nodes, and
    often to the liver, lungs, or bone marrow.
  • Staging
  • Stage IA/IB skin lt/gt 10
  • Stage IIA peripheral adenopathy
  • Stage IIB tumor
  • Stage III erythroderma disease
  • Diagnosis skin biopsy
  • Treatment
  • TSEBT
  • Psoralen with UV light (PUVA)
  • Extracorporeal photochemotherapy

4
Leukemia Cutis
  • Cutaneous manifestations of any type of leukemia
    with infiltration of neoplastic leukocytes or
    their precursors into the skin
  • Skin nodules that move freely over subcutaneous
    tissue but are well-fixed to the skin.
  • Skin involvement is characteristic of monoblastic
    and myelomonocytic leukemias (most commonly AML)
    ? poor prognosis, harbinger of BM relapse.
  • Typical Treatment 4 times a week with 200 cGy
    per fraction to a total dose of 1200 cGy, using 6
    MeV electrons.

5
Electron Beam Physics
  • Electron Beam Production
  • Central Axis Depth Dose Curve
  • Isodose Curves
  • Field Flatness and Symmetry
  • Field Size Dependence
  • X-Ray Contamination

6
Electron Beam Production
The scattering foil (dual-scattering foils
separated 510 cm) to broaden the beam Secondary
(x-ray) collimator and electron applicator to
collimate the beam Ion chamber (actually dual,
segmented ionization chamber) used to monitor the
beam
7
Electron Energy Spectrum
8
Central Axis Depth Dose Curve
  • Ds Relative surface Dose at 0.5 mm
  • Dx dose due to x-ray component, bremsstrahlung
    tail
  • G0 normalized dose gradient, G0 Rp/(Rp Rq)
  • If G0 is large ? rapid fall off
  • R100 distance corresponding to Dmax (R85, R50,
    Rp), zmax
  • R90 E/3.2 (13/3.2 4 cm)
  • R80 E/2.8 (13/2.8 4.6 cm)
  • Dmax 0.46 x E0.67
  • (0.46 x 130.67 2.56 cm)

9
Depthdose curves in water for multiple electron
beam energies
  • 1060 MeV for large fields at 200 cm SSD
  • 5 MV (small-dashed line) and 22 MV (long-dashed
    line) x-ray beams for a 10 10 cm2 field at 100
    cm SSD
  • Electrons lose energy at rate of 2 MeV/cm in
    water/tissue
  • Surface dose for E beams increases with electron
    energy
  • Lower electron energies ? steeper fall off due to
    scattering and conntinuous energy loss.
  • Increased bremsstrahlung contamination

10
Field Size Dependence
  • The field-size dependence of percent depth dose
    is illustrated for an 18 MeV beam.
  • Lateral Scatter Equilibrium
  • Req 0.88 (E)1/2
  • Req 0.88 (18)1/2 3.7 cm
  • Fields smaller than Req, field size dependent
  • Fields larger than Req, not field size dependent
  • For rectangular fields, percent depth dose is
    best determined using the square-root method
  • DX,Y DX,X DY,Y1/2

11
Isodose Curve
  • Central axis distribution
  • Flatness
  • Curvature near field borders (bulge)
  • Lateral Constriction
  • Differences in machines
  • Different collimation systems, and
  • Air column above the patient, cause
  • Angular dispersion of the beam as well as the
    energy spread

12
Field Flatness Symmetry
  • Low Energy Beam greater expansion
  • High Energy Beam
  • only low isodose bulge
  • Lateral constriction which becomes worse with
    decreasing field size

13
Build Up Curve Skin Effect
  • Low energy electron beam greater fluence due to
    scatter, greater skin effect, less skin sparing
  • High energy electron beam smaller fluence.

14
Treatment Planning
  • Choice of energy and field size
  • Corrections for air gap and beam obliquity
  • Tissue heterogeneities
  • Use of bolus and absorbers
  • Problems with adjacent fields
  • Field Shaping
  • External Shielding
  • Measurement of transmission curves
  • Effect of blocking on dose rate
  • Internal Shielding

15
Patient Positioning
  • Treatment area entire body surface to a limited
    depth and to a uniform dose using electrons.
  • Field Size treatment plane must be
    approximately 200 cm in height by 80 cm in width
    to encompass the largest patient.
  • Uniformity vertical 8 and horizontal of
    4 over the central 160 cm x 60 cm area

16
Stanford Six Dual Field Technique
  • Developed by C. J. Karzmark at Stanford
    University in 1960s.
  • The patient was treated at a large distance
    (typically more than 400 cm) from the source in a
    standing position.
  • A dual field consisting of two gantry angles was
    used, with each pointing up or down from the
    horizontal direction.
  • To achieve a uniform dose over the entire body,
    the patient was rotated around the vertical axis
    six times at 60 intervals so that six dual
    fields had been delivered.
  • Patient factors
  • Variable thickness of the skin
  • Surface irregularities of its surface
  • Machine factors
  • high output, large fields, and extended SSD.
  • The Stanford technique requires the irradiation
    of the patient at 6 different positions.
  • Unusual positions may be quite uncomfortable for
    the patients, especially for the elderly.
  • They have to stand on their own throughout the
    long treatment procedure, with their eyes
    covered, often causing loss of orientation.

17
Tissue Heterogeneity
  • Coefficient of Equivalent Thickness (CET) of a
    material is given by its electron density
    relative to the electron density of water and is
    essentially equivalent to the mass density.
  • Lung
  • Density of 0.25 g/cm3 and a CET of 0.25.
  • A thickness of 1 cm of lung is equivalent to 0.25
    cm of tissue.
  • Solid bone has a CET of approximately 1.6

18
TSEB Irradiation Dose
  • High Dose
  • 4 to 6 MeV beam 36 to 40 Gy over 8 to 10 weeks
  • Up to 40 of pts treated with high dose TSEB
    irradiation remain relapse free for long periods
  • High frequency of initial clearing after high
    dose irradiation, but lower continuous disease
    free survival
  • Sustained disease free survival primarily for
    patients with Stage Ib or IIa MF
  • Adverse Effects
  • Erythema the MF lesions become red and
    pigmented, desquamated
  • Temp scalp alopecia
  • Temp nail stasis
  • Hands/feet edema
  • Minor nosebleeds
  • Blisters on fingers and feet
  • Anhidrosis, parotiditis, gynecomastia
  • Corneal tears from internal eye shields

19
References Electron Beam Physics
20
References
  • Stanford Technique
  • Karzmark, C. J. Leo Vinger, R. Steel, R. E. A
    technique for large-field superficial electron
    therapy. Radiology 174633 1960.
  • Karzmark, C. J. Large-field superficial electron
    therapy with linear accelerators. Br. J. Radiol.
    37302 1964.
  • Karxmark, C. J. Physical aspects of whole-body
    superficial therapy with electrons. Front.
    Radiat. Tber. Gncol. 236 1968.

21
References
22
References
  • INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, The Use of
    Plane Parallel Ionization Chambers in High Energy
    Electron and Photon Beams, Technical Reports
    Series No. 381, IAEA, Vienna (1997).
  • Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam
    Radiotherapy, Technical Reports Series No. 398,
    IAEA, Vienna (2000).
  • INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIATION UNITS AND
    MEASUREMENTS, Radiation Dosimetry Electron Beams
    with Energies Between 1 and 50 MeV, Rep. 35,
    ICRU, Bethesda, MD (1984).
  • JOHNS, H.E., CUNNINGHAM, J.R., The Physics of
    Radiology, Thomas, Springfield, IL (1985).
  • KLEVENHAGEN, S.C., Physics and Dosimetry of
    Therapy Electron Beams, Medical Physics
    Publishing, Madison, WI (1993).
  • VAN DYK, J. (Ed.), Modern Technology of Radiation
    Oncology A Compendium for Medical Physicists and
    Radiation Oncologists, Medical Physics
    Publishing, Madison, WI (1999).

23
Effect of Field Size on DD
24
MF TNM
  • TNM(B) Definitions Primary tumor (T)
  • T1 Limited patch/plaque (lt10 of skin surface
    involved)
  • T2 Generalized patch/plaque (10 of skin
    surface involved)
  • T3 Cutaneous tumors (one or more)
  • T4 Generalized erythroderma (with or without
    patches, plaques, or tumors)
  •  Note Pathology of T1T4 is diagnostic of
    cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). When
    characteristics of more than one T-type tumor
    exist, both are recorded and the highest is used
    for staging, for example, T4(3).
  • Regional lymph nodes (N)
  • N0 Lymph nodes clinically uninvolved the
    pathology is negative for CTCL
  • N1 Lymph nodes clinically enlarged,
    histologically uninvolved the pathology is
    negative for CTCL
  • N2 Lymph nodes clinically unenlarged,
    histologically involved the pathology is
    positive for CTCL
  • N3 Lymph nodes enlarged and histologically
    involved the pathology is positive for CTCL
  • Distant metastasis (M)
  • M0 No visceral disease
  • M1 Visceral disease present
  • Blood involvement (B)
  • B0 No circulating atypical cells (lt1000 Sézary
    cells CD4 CD7-/mL)
  • B1 Circulating atypical cells (1000 Sézary
    cells CD4 CD7-/mL)
  • TNM Stage Groupings
  • Stage IA T1, N0, M0
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com