GENERAL ELECTRIC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

GENERAL ELECTRIC

Description:

... overall responsibility relating to executive compensation. ... Executive Compensation Program. Salary, Annual Bonus, Stock options, Restricted Stock Units, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: pcpo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GENERAL ELECTRIC


1
GENERAL ELECTRIC
2
Overview
  • General information
  • History of the company
  • Financial highlights
  • Stocks
  • Corporate governance
  • Board of directors
  • Governance actions
  • Corporate governance principles
  • Committees
  • Management Development and Compensation Committee
  • MDCC Responsibilities,
  • Key Practices.
  • CEO Selection
  • Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • CEO Candidates
  • Advantages of the new CEO
  • Other Finalists
  • Was the choice correct?
  • What was different?

3
GE general information
  • GE is a diversified technology and services
    company dedicated to creating different products
    from aircraft engines and power generation to
    financial services, medical imaging, television
    programming and plastics,
  • GE operates in more than 100 countries, including
    250 manufacturing plants in 26 different nations
  • GE employs more than 315,000 people worldwide,
    including 168,000 in the United States

4
GE History
  • In 1878 Thomas A. Edison established Edison
    Electric Light Company.
  • In 1892, a merger of Edison General Electric
    Company and Thomson-Houston Electric Company
    created General Electric Company.
  • GE was incorporated in New York State on April
    15, 1892.

5
GE Financial Highlights
  • Revenues 131.7 Billion
  • Net Earnings 15.1 Billion (1.51 per share),
    which is a 7 increase over 2001
  • International Revenues 52.9 Billion (40 of
    total revenues)
  • RD Expenditures 2.6 Billion
  • Total Assets 575.0 Billion
  • Company achieved record earnings and cash
    generation in 2001, with 11 increases in
    earnings and earnings per share (EPS) and 12
    growth in cash flow from operating activities.
  • "2001 was an especially challenging year," said
    GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt. "Despite a
    global recession and the September 11 terrorist
    attacks, we delivered double-digit earnings
    growth. This is a tribute to our great global
    team and the strength of the GE business model."

6
GE Stocks
  • First issue of company stocks was on April 15,
    1892 when 1,000 shares of 100 par value were
    sold for 100 per share
  • GE was traded on the NYSE for the first time on
    June 23, 1892. There was one trade of 50 shares
    at 108 per share
  • Now the company has
  • Shares Outstanding 9.947 Billion
  • Number of Share Owners 4 Million
  • Dividends 0.19 per share quarterly. Dividends,
    paid every quarter since 1899, have increased
    every year since 1975.

7
GE Stocks
8
GE Corporate Governance
  • The Board of directors of the company consists of
    17 members.
  • As a result of the 2002 changes, 11 of GEs 17
    directors are independent under a strict
    definition, with a goal of two-thirds.
  • At the core of corporate governance is the role
    of the board in overseeing how management serves
    the long-term interests of share owners and other
    stakeholders.

9
GE Corporate Governance
10
GE Corporate governance
  • GOVERNANCE ACTIONS TAKEN BY GE IN 2002 INCLUDE
  • GEs test of independence for members of the
    Management Development and Compensation Committee
    and the Nominating and Corporate Governance
    Committee is stricter than required by new
    regulations
  • GE has appointed a presiding director who will
    lead independent meetings of non-employee
    directors at least three times a year. Each
    non-employee director will visit two of GEs
    businesses each year without the presence of
    corporate management so that directors can have
    direct exchanges with operating leadership.
  • The responsibilities of the Audit Committee will
    increase, and it will meet at least seven times
    per year.
  • To help further align directors interests with
    those of share owners, the equity portion of
    directors pay will be in Deferred Stock Units
    (DSUs), replacing stock options. DSUs will be 60
    of the annual director compensation and will not
    pay out until one year after a director leaves
    the board. When directors exercise existing stock
    options, they will be subject to the same
    one-year holding period that applies to GE senior
    management.

11
GE Corporate Governance Principles
  • Role of Board and Management
  • GE's business is conducted by its employees,
    managers and officers, under the direction of the
    chief executive officer (CEO) and the oversight
    of the board, to enhance the long-term value of
    the company for its shareowners.
  • Functions of Board
  • The board of directors has 8 scheduled meetings a
    year at which it reviews and discusses reports by
    management on the performance of the company, its
    plans and prospects, as well as immediate issues
    facing the company. Directors are expected to
    attend all scheduled board and committee
    meetings.
  • In addition to its general oversight of
    management, the board also performs a number of
    specific functions, including.
  • selecting, evaluating and compensating the CEO
    and overseeing CEO succession planning
  • providing counsel and oversight on the selection,
    evaluation, development and compensation of
    senior management
  • reviewing, approving and monitoring fundamental
    financial and business strategies and major
    corporate actions
  • Qualifications
  • Directors who also serve as CEOs or in equivalent
    positions should not serve on more than two
    boards of public companies in addition to the GE
    board, and other directors should not serve on
    more than four other boards of public companies
    in addition to the GE board.
  • Directors will not be nominated for election to
    the board after their 73rd birthday, although the
    full board may nominate candidates over 73 for
    special circumstances.

12
GE Corporate Governance Principles
  • Independence of Directors
  • The board has determined that 11 of GE's 17
    directors are independent.
  • The company will seek to have a minimum of ten
    independent directors at all times, and it is the
    board's goal that at least two-thirds of the
    directors will be independent.
  • Size of Board and Selection Process
  • The directors are elected each year by the
    shareowners at the annual meeting of shareowners.
  • The board also determines the number of directors
    on the board provided that there are at least 10.
    Between annual shareowner meetings, the board may
    elect directors to serve until the next annual
    meeting. The board believes that, given the size
    and breadth of GE and the need for diversity of
    board views, the size of the board should be in
    the range of 15 directors.
  • Board Committees
  • audit
  • management development and compensation
  • nominating and corporate governance and
  • public responsibilities.

13
GE Corporate Governance Principles
  • Independence of Committee Members
  • members of the audit committee must also satisfy
    an additional NYSE independence requirement.
  • Members may not directly or indirectly receive
    any compensation from the company other than
    their directors' compensation.
  • Self-Evaluation
  • the board and each of the committees will perform
    an annual self-evaluation. Each November, the
    directors will be requested to provide their
    assessments of the effectiveness of the board and
    the committees on which they serve. The
    individual assessments will be organized and
    summarized by an independent corporate governance
    expert for discussion with the board and the
    committees in December.
  • Compensation of Board
  • The nominating and corporate governance committee
    shall have the responsibility for recommending to
    the board compensation and benefits for
    non-employee directors.
  • The committee believes these goals will be served
    by providing 40 of non-employee director
    compensation in cash and 60 in deferred stock
    units starting in 2003.
  • At the end of each year, the nominating and
    corporate governance committee shall review
    non-employee director compensation and benefits.

14
GE Corporate Governance Principles
  • Succession Plan
  • The board shall approve and maintain a succession
    plan for the CEO and senior executives, based
    upon recommendations from the management
    development and compensation committee.
  • Annual Compensation Review of Senior Management
  • The management development and compensation
    committee shall annually approve the goals and
    objectives for compensating the CEO.
  • That committee shall evaluate the CEO's
    performance in light of these goals before
    setting the CEO's salary, bonus and other
    incentive and equity compensation.
  • Access to Senior Management
  • Non-employee directors are encouraged to contact
    senior managers of the company without senior
    corporate management present.
  • To facilitate such contact, non-employee
    directors are expected to make two regularly
    scheduled visits to GE businesses a year without
    corporate management being present.

15
Management Development and Compensation Committee
  • The management development and compensation
    committee of the board of directors of General
    Electric Company shall consist of a minimum of
    three directors.
  • The committee meets at least 8 times a year.
  • All members of the committee shall be independent
    directors.
  • The purpose of the committee shall be to carry
    out the board of directors' overall
    responsibility relating to executive
    compensation.
  • The committee's judgments regarding senior
    executive officer compensation are primarily
    based upon its assessment of each senior
    executive officer's leadership performance and
    potential to enhance long-term shareowner value.

16
Management Development and Compensation Committee
  • The committee relies upon judgment about each
    individual, not upon rigid guidelines or
    formulas, or short term changes in our stock
    price, in determining the amount and mix of
    compensation elements for each senior executive
    officer.
  • Key factors affecting the committee's judgments
    include
  • the nature and scope of their responsibilities
  • their contribution to the company's financial
    results
  • their effectiveness in leading our initiatives to
    increase customer value, productivity and growth
  • their contribution to the company's commitment to
    corporate responsibility including their success
    in creating a culture of unyielding integrity and
    compliance with applicable law and our ethics
    policies, and
  • their commitment to community leadership and
    diversity.

17
MDCC Responsibilities
  • The committee shall assist the board in
    developing and evaluating potential candidates
    for executive positions, including the chief
    executive officer, and to oversee the development
    of executive succession plans.
  • The committee shall evaluate at least once a year
    the chief executive officer's performance in
    light of these established goals and objectives.
  • The committee shall evaluate the performance of
    the company's senior executive officers and shall
    approve the annual compensation, including
    salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation,
    for such senior executive officers.
  • The committee has shall review company's
    incentive compensation and other stock-based
    plans and recommend changes in such plans to the
    board as needed.
  • The committee shall report its actions and any
    recommendations to the board after each committee
    meeting and shall conduct and present to the
    board an annual performance evaluation of the
    committee.

18
MDCC key practices
  • Executive Compensation Program
  • Salary,
  • Annual Bonus,
  • Stock options,
  • Restricted Stock Units,
  • Contingent Long-Term Performance Awards.

19
MDCC key practices
  • Stock Ownership Guidelines
  • To help demonstrate the alignment of the personal
    interest of senior management with the interests
    of shareowners, in September 2002, the committee
    established the following guidelines for the
    amount of GE stock, as a multiple of the
    executive's base salary, that should be held by
    senior management
  • Position Multiple Time To Attain
  • CEO 6X 3 years
  • Vice Chair 5X 4 years
  • Senior VPs 4X 5 years

20
Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • Formally in June 24, 1994
  • Agenda of the MDCCs meeting - succession
  • Welch discussed 24 candidates (all white males)
  • Obvious Field
  • Contenders
  • Broader Consensus Field

21
Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • Formally in June 24, 1994
  • Agenda of the MDCCs meeting - succession
  • Welch discussed 24 candidates (all white males)
  • Obvious Field
  • Contenders
  • Broader Consensus Field

22
Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • Obvious Field
  • 7 men running GEs largest businesses
  • Had to be considered due to their positions
  • Could be eliminated due to age
  • None made to the final

23
Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • Contenders
  • 4 executives below the top-tier
  • None became finalists

24
Starting the Process of CEO selection
  • Broader Consensus Field
  • 13 other executives from various positions
  • Spotted by Welch for their talents
  • Included all 3 finalists

25
CEO Candidates
  • Robert Nardelli
  • Age 52.
  • Chief of the GE business that makes turbines and
    generators for electric utilities.

26
CEO Candidates
  • W. James McNerney
  • Age 51.
  • CEO, GE Aircraft Engines (ran several other
    divisions during his 15 years in GE).
  • In 1997 media guessed he would be a top
    vote-getter.

27
CEO Candidates
  • Jeffrey Immelt
  • Age 47.
  • Began his GE career in 1982.
  • Held a series of leadership roles in GE Plastics,
    Medical Systems, GE Appliances.

28
CEO Selection
  • Testing the ability to grow.
  • Rotating CEO candidates through different
    divisions of the company.
  • GEs advantage over many other companies
    -reputation of skillfully training internal
    talents for the top job.
  • mainly due to GEs large portfolio of businesses
    which provide broad developmental experiences for
    its executives.
  • not every company ranking equally high the GE is
    able to cultivate internal CEOs (eg. IBM, ATT).

29
CEO Selection
  • Directors getting a feel to the human side of the
    contenders.
  • Annual festive occasions with serious purpose
  • playing golf
  • Welch personally worked out the golf foursomes
  • informal dinners
  • seating directors and CEO candidates carefully
  • Candidates encouraged to contact board directors
    directly when needed

30
CEO Selection
  • Follow-up Discussions
  • Usual review of the companys top 20-30
    executives, including all CEO candidates
  • Welch gave an assessment of each executive from
    his HANDWRITTEN notes
  • Directors received a book that detail executives
  • We might spend an hour on the first page. Its
    not what most people are used to W. Conaty, GE
    Human Resources Chief

31
CEO Selection
  • MDCC Visits to GE Businesses.
  • In 1996-1997 MDCC decided to know more about the
    candidates and visited several GE businesses with
    and without Welch.
  • with a cover story of wanting to understand
    their businesses.
  • very rarely practiced in the corporate world.

32
CEO Selection
  • Cutting the Field.
  • At the intensive talent review in 1997, after 3
    years of getting to know the contenders, Welch
    and directors cut the list of candidates to
    eight
  • finalists
  • David Calhoun, GE Lighting.
  • David Cote, GE Appliances.
  • Dennis Dammerman, CFO.
  • John Rice, Transportation Systems.
  • Gary Rogers, GE Plastics.

33
CEO Selection
  • Endgame begins
  • Starting from June 1998, all contenders left in
    their jobs until the winner is chosen
  • Time to watch...

34
CEO Selection
  • Field Narrowing
  • Dammerman
  • replaces the CEO of the GE Capital who resigned
    in Dec. 1998
  • Calhoun
  • leaves Lighting to run Employers Reinsurance
    business in GE Capital in July 1999
  • David Cote
  • resigned in Nov. 1999 to become a President and
    CEO of TRW

35
CEO Selection
  • Without drama and horce race!
  • Welchs experience while running for CEO
  • Airplane Interviews
  • Welchs predecessor Reginal H. Jones called
    abruptly each contender to his office and asked
    Who should be the next chairman if both were on
    a plane and it crashed?
  • top contenders were brought together to the
    headquarter jobs, where the atmosphere became
    political and poisonous

36
CEO Selection
  • Finalists announced
  • In mid 2000 Welch was ready to announce the names
    of the finalists
  • Immelt
  • Nardelli
  • backed up by John Rice
  • McNerney
  • backed up by Calhoun

37
CEO Selection
  • Last meeting of MDCC.
  • Welch and MDCC talked about succession for about
    4 hours.
  • Seemed like Immelt is the one, but no firm
    decision could be made.
  • Other guys were doing fabulous things Conaty.

38
CEO Selection
  • Final Choice
  • Welch is still determined not to make the process
    public until then end.
  • The right time - Thanksgiving weekend.
  • After two hours of discussion between Welch and
    MDCC Immelt was chosen, Board agreed with the
    recommendation.
  • Welch calls Immelt

39
Advantages of the new CEO
  • Age was his advantage.
  • Well-liked and popular.
  • can keep managers who might be tempted to leave,
    when Welch leaves.
  • Demonstrated capacity to grow.

40
Other Finalists
  • Both McNerney and Nardelli instantly became the
    two most intensively recruited executives
  • McNerney, CEO at 3M
  • Nardelli, CEO at Home Depot

41
Was the choice correct?
  • GE keeps ranking as the worlds most respected
    company according to Financial Times annual
    surveys
  • Welch era - longest bull market in the US history
  • Immelts early tenure - bear market, terrorist
    attacks, war in Iraque.

42
What was different?
  • Never looked at an outsider.
  • Formed no long-term strategic vision.
  • No common template for measuring candidates.
  • A lot of time devoted by the board to getting to
    know the contenders.
  • Choosing the new CEO took almost 6.5 years.
  • A lot of human interaction.

43
Conclusions
  • The more time spent on succession planning, the
    better.
  • The Board is deeply involved in succession.
  • CEO and Board communicate frequently reviewing
    their choices.
  • Human interaction between board and the
    candidates is essential for good assessments.

44
Conclusions (cont.)
  • Less drama of succession and horse races among
    top contenders - ethical issues.
  • CEO assigns candidates jobs to broaden their
    skills.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com