ABM Applications to the Social Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

ABM Applications to the Social Sciences

Description:

actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor. actor ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ABM Applications to the Social Sciences


1
ABM Applications to the Social Sciences
  • Lars-Erik Cederman
  • Department of Government, Harvard
  • EITM Workshop, July 18, 2002

2
Outline Applications
  • Three types of agent-based models
  • Example Barabasis Preferential Attachment Model
  • Applications to political science
  • Example GeoSim and the democratic peace
  • Validation

3
Three types of emergent effects
Emergent behavioral patterns
D
C
actor
actor
actor
Emergent boundaries and networks
actor
actor
Emergent cultural configurations
4
Barabasis Preferential Attachment Model
  • A. L. Barabasi et al. 1999. Mean-field theory
    for scale-free random networks. Physica A 272
    173-187.

5
Applications to political science
  • Cooperation theory Axelrod etc.
  • Voting and party politics Kollman, Miller,
    Page 1992
  • Ethnic conflict Bhavnani Backer 2000 Epstein
    et al 2001 Lustick 2000 Cederman 2001
  • Geopolitical models Bremer Mihalka 1977
    Cusack and Stoll 1990 Cederman 1997

6
Modeling the democratic peace with agent-based
modeling
  • Assume the democratic peace hypothesis to hold at
    the micro-level
  • How can the democratic peace spread to the entire
    state system?
  • Reference Modeling the Democratic Peace as a
    Kantian Selection Process Journal of Conflict
    Resolution (August 2001).

7
Outline
  • 1. Modeling geopolitics
  • 2. Adding tags
  • 3. Adding alliances
  • 4. Adding collective security
  • 5. Replications
  • 6. Conclusions

8
Modeling geopolitics GeoSim
  • Hobbesian geopolitical environment
  • Cederman 1997 Emergent Actorsgt RePast
  • 15 x 15 grid
  • local combat and conquest
  • two types of actors
  • non-democratic states power-seekers
  • democratic states conditional cooperators

9
A dynamic network on a grid
10
Tagged decision rule for democratic state i
  • for all external fronts j do
  • if i or j fought or j attacked an ally of i
    then
  • attack j else cooperate with j Grim
    Trigger
  • if there is no action on any front then
  • randomly select a non-democratic neighbor state
    j
  • with probability p(i,j) factoring in alliances
    do
  • launch unprovoked attack against j

11
Threshold functions
Probability
Decision to attack p(i,j)
Combat victory
Force ratio
12
Structural change conquest
  • Conquest follows victorious battles
  • Each attacker randomly selects a battle path
    consisting of an attacking province and a target
  • The outcome depends on the targets nature
  • if it is an atom, the whole target is absorbed
  • if it is a capital, the target state collapses
  • if it is a province, the target is absorbed

13
Guaranteeing territorial contiguity
Conquest... resulting in... partial state
collapse
"near abroad" cut off from capital
Target Province
Agent Province
j
i
14
Geopolitical sample run
Time 0
Time 1000
15
Sample run with tags
Time 0
Time 1000
16
Sample run with alliances
Time 12
Time 1000
17
Sample run with collective security
Time 76
Time 1000
18
Share of democracies at t1000
19
Conclusions from DP-Model
  • It is indeed possible to grow the democratic
    peace in a Hobbesian world
  • All three Kantian mechanisms contribute to the
    democratic peace
  • Spatial context crucial for cooperation
  • But tagging does not always suffice
  • Counter-intuitive finding democracy may
    undermine itself

20
Four types of validation
Object of validation End point
Process
Mode of validation Qualitative Distribu- tiona
l
21
The limits of ABM?
  • ad hoc assumptions
  • failure to yield predictions
  • fragility of results
  • lack of cumulation

22
General readings on agent-based modeling
  • Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of
    Cooperation Agent-Based Models of Competition
    and Collaboration. Princeton Princeton
    University Press.
  • Casti, John L. 1997. Would-Be Worlds How
    Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science.
    New York Wiley.
  • Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1997. Emergent Actors in
    World Politics How States and Nations Develop
    and Dissolve. Princeton Princeton University
    Press.
  • Epstein, Joshua M. and Robert Axtell. 1996.
    Growing Artificial Societies Social Science From
    the Bottom Up. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
  • Holland, John H. 1995. Hidden Order How
    Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, Mass.
    Addison-Wesley.
  • Special issue on Computational Modeling, The
    Political Methodologist, Fall 2001.
  • See also web pages http//www.courses.fas.harvard.
    edu/gov2015 and http//www.courses.fas.harvard.ed
    u/gov2016
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com