Generic vs. Oreo The Oreo Challenge America - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Generic vs. Oreo The Oreo Challenge America

Description:

Time Constraints Smaller sample size. Cookie presentation order: Marginal Cookie Utility? ... Data Sheet. Conceptualizing our Statistics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jonathant151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Generic vs. Oreo The Oreo Challenge America


1
Generic vs. OreoThe Oreo ChallengeAmericas
Favorite Cookie!???
  • February 19, 2004
  • Math 5
  • Marlon Henry, Christin Lathrop, Jonathan Smolian

2
Goals
  • To determine whether superiority in OREO brand
    name corresponds to superiority in taste.
  • Compare the taste of OREO cookies to a generic
    equivalentPrice Chopper Big Stuffed cookies.
  • Compare subjects taste preferences to their
    social preferences.
  • Is the perceived OREO superiority warranted?

3
Pre-Test Beliefs
  • A greater proportion of people would NOT prefer
    OREOs.
  • Did not perceive ANY taste difference.
  • OR
  • Preferred Price Chopper or had No Preference

No Difference Generic No Preference
OREO
OREO
VS.
4
A Generic Success!
  • 55 A Non-OREO preference was given.
  • 45 OREO preference was given.

5
Confounding Factors
  • Initial decision Taste vs. Experience
  • Time Constraints Smaller sample size
  • Cookie presentation order
  • Marginal Cookie Utility?
  • Testing Procedure Variability
  • Vague Language
  • Texture/Visual influence

BUT
6
Not Confounding Enough
  • Still a strong test.
  • Our beliefs are right!
  • Conclusion We can accept the data.

7
THE CHALLENGE
VS.
8
Testing in Novack
  • Procedure
  • Administer cookie samples using a double blind
    method
  • Cups 1 2 water in between,
  • then
  • Ask Questions.

9
Our Questions
  • 1st Difference in the taste?
  • 2nd Preference in taste (if any)?
  • 3rd Determine honest social preference.

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Data Sheet
14
Conceptualizing our Statistics
  • Create a statistic for difference in taste vs.
    social preference.
  • Xbefore

0 if OREO
1 if No Difference, Generic, No Preference
0 if OREO
  • Xafter

1 if Generic or No Preference
D Xbefore- Xafter
15
Conceptualizing our Statistics 2
? D
D
N
D is the average of the differences in taste vs.
social preference
16
Null Hypothesis
  • On average, people will have consistent taste
    preferences D0
  • The probability of D0 is p0.5

17
Alternate Hypothesis
  • People are more likely NOT to prefer the taste of
    OREOs while socially preferring OREOs.
  • Dgt0
  • This was our initial belief.

18
Statistically Significant
  • Our results are statistically significant at a
    level of 0.05.
  • This leaves 5 chance of Type 1 Error.
  • Furthermore, D0.225 /- 0.15 and falls within
    our critical region for a significance level of
    0.05 in a right-sided normal distribution curve.

19
Interpretations
  • The majority of people do not prefer the taste of
    OREO cookies!
  • BUT, for the majority of people, OREO is their
    social preference.
  • Therefore, peoples taste and social
    preferences do NOT match.

20
Larger Conclusions
  • The taste of OREO cookies is not superior to the
    taste of the generic Price Chopper Big Stuffed
    cookies.
  • People buy OREOs for more than their taste.
  • Specifically, OREOs financial success is due to
    extensive marketing and advertising efforts, not
    because the product tastes any better than
    generic cookies.
  • People tend to buy brand name products even if
    the brand name product is strikingly similar to
    the generic version.

21
Finally
  • AMERICANS ARE BRAND NAME CONSUMERS-
  • and they love
  • AMERICAS FAVORITE COOKIE!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com