IBROW Progress Report - OU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IBROW Progress Report - OU

Description:

Abstraction Knowledge needed to construct the partial order given by the ... provides only a goal specification, while the latter provides ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Enrico50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IBROW Progress Report - OU


1
IBROW Progress Report - OU
  • Enrico Motta
  • Knowledge Media Institute

2
Classification Library in OCML (at the end of
IBROW 1)
  • Task spec (TaskSpec1)
  • Flat classification PSM (GenPSM1)
  • Applied to apple and Rocky-III domains

3
Current work
  • Revision of TaskSpec1
  • Revision of GenPSM1
  • Definition of new problem solving models (e.g.,
    heuristic classification)
  • Work still in very draft form!

4
Task Spec
Observables
Classification
Solutions
Solution_Space
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Task Spec (revised)
Observables
Classification
Solutions
Solution_Space
Criterion
11
Classification
Simple-Classification-PSM
Match-Candidate-Solution
Compare-Match-Scores
Basic-Match-Candidate-PSM
Basic-Compare-Match-Scores-PSM
Match-Feature
Basic-Match-Feature-PSM
12
Classification
Heuristic-Classification-PSM
Abstraction
Match--Compare
Refine-Solution
Refine-Solution-PSM
MatchCompare-PSM
Abstraction-PSM
Match-Candidate-Solution
Compare-Match-Scores
Basic-Match-Candidate-PSM
Basic-Compare-Match-Scores-PSM
Match-Feature
Basic-Match-Feature-PSM
13
Problem Solving Knowledge
  • Abstraction Knowledge needed to construct the
    partial order given by the abstraction_of
    relation
  • Refinement Knowledge normally follows the
    subclass-of hierarchy
  • Matching mechanism uses a 4-dimensional vector
  • Inconsistent features
  • Explained features
  • Unxplained features (in obs. but not in solution)
  • Missing features(in solution but not in obs.)

14
Back to OCML....
15
(def-class classification-task (goal-specification
-task) ?task ((has-input-role value
has-solution_space value
has-observables value
has-criterion) (has-output-role value
best-matching-solutions) (has-solution_space
type solution_space) (has-criterion type
match_criterion) (has-observables type
observables) (best-matching-solutions type
solution_space) (has-precondition value
(kappa (?task) (and (exists
?obs (member-of
?obs
(role-value ?task has-observables)))
(exists ?sol
(member-of ?sol
(role-value ?task
has-solution_space)))
(match_criterion (role-value ?task
has-criterion)))))
(has-goal-expression the goal is
to find the best matching classes value
(kappa (?task ?solutions)
(forall ?sol (gt
(member ?sol ?solutions)
(best-match ?sol
(role-value ?task
has-solution_space)
(role-value ?task has-observables)

(role-value ?task has-criterion)
)))))))
16
(def-class TASK () ?task "An OCML task is
characterised by its input roles, output role,
and goal. The goal expression is a kappa
expression which takes as argument the task
itself and a value (which is meant to be a
possible result from carrying out the task.
The goal is satisfied if the kappa expression
holds for its two arguments. A role is a
slot of a task. Tasks divide into two main
subclasses goal-specification-task and
executable-task. The former provides only a
goal specification, while the latter provides
also an 'organic' method for achieving the
task ((has-input-role type role)
(has-output-role type role) (has-precondition
type unary-kappa-expression)
(has-goal-expression type legal-task-goal-express
ion)) constraint (gt (has-role ?task ?role)
(and (slot-of ?role ?task)
(functional-relation ?role)))
axiom-def (exhaustive-subclass-partition
task (set-of
goal-specification-task
executable-task)))
17
(def-class UNARY-KAPPA-EXPRESSION
(kappa-expression) ?rel "Relations defined by
means of the kappa operator" iff-def (and
(kappa-expression ?rel) (
(length ?schema) 1)))
(def-class TERM (ocml-expression) ?x "The
class of OCML functional terms" iff-def (or
(string ?x) (variable ?x)
(constant ?x)
(quote-expression ?x)
(findall-expression ?x)
(the-expression ?x)
(setofall-expression ?x) (if-term
?x) (cond-term ?x)
(in-env-term ?x)
(eval-expression ?x)
(call-expression ?x)
(apply-expression ?x)
(defined-function-expression ?x)))
18
Conclusions
  • Need for an object-level language for UPML
  • key task for IBROW!!!
  • These issues have already been discussed in depth
    by Dieter
  • Planning to use OCML
  • at least in the short term
  • Will investigate changes to OCML base ontology
    required to reflect the UPML architecture
  • e.g., definitions of classes Task, PSM, etc.
  • Also planning to experiment with Protégé
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com