S Akhtar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

S Akhtar

Description:

One presumes that the amendment was made without a full appreciation of its implications. ... High chances of surviving to old ages may call for a new paradigm, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: IRF15
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: S Akhtar


1
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Karachi Sheraton, 5 April 2007
  • Early Bird Seminar on
  • Looming Old-Age Crisis for Retired Pakistanis
  • A Presentation by Samee-ul-Hasan, FIA, FPSA,
    FCII, FLMI, ASA
  • Consulting Actuary
  • 3rd Floor (Annexe), State Life No 1 Building,
    Chundrigar Road, Karachi 74000, Pakistan
  • Phone 92-21-111-00-00-53 Fax 92-21-2417810
    Email actuaries_at_akhasan.com
  • www.akhasan.com

2
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
Subjects discussed
3
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Present and Projected Pakistani population aged
    60 and over
  • The population at different ages is the starting
    point for studying the old age income problem.
    Table 1 shows this.
  • Table 1
  • Pakistan Population according to 1998 census (in
    millions)

4
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • The 1998 census counted 3.8 million males
    3.2 million females aged 60 . Males
    out-numbered females by 19!
  • The Indian Census 2001 showed 37. 8 million
    males and 38.9 million females at 60 . Females
    out-numbered males by 3 ! Clearly, Pakistani
    females are under-counted.
  • The age-wise data is unreliable anyway.
  • But let's take 1998 age wise count as we find
    it. Let's use population mortality rates in 2001
    Pakistan Demographic Survey, smooth and extend
    them to old ages, and project some improvement in
    mortality. Result is in Table 2.

5
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Table 2
  • Projected number of Pakistanis age 60 and over
    (In millions)

Based on (i) 1998 census age-wise population (ii)
Mortality by age and in 2001 Pakistan Demographic
Survey. PDS mortality rates were smoothed,
extended to older ages, with some projected
improvement. The proportion of women over 60
would rise gradually because of lower female
mortality rates. Actual results will differ from
these projections, because of errors in census
age reporting, uncertainty of current population
mortality estimates, and uncertain future
mortality improvements.
6
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Pakistanis aged 60 currently number around 9
    million.
  • Possibly about 1.5 million1 Federal,
    Provincial, and Defence Services pensioners aged
    60 .
  • 200,000 EOBI pensioners aged 60, including
    spouses.
  • Number of pensioners of non-government
    employers not known, but small.
  • So 80 of Pakistanis over 60 get no pensions
    at all. If we consider couples where the male is
    over 60, at a guess more than 70 of such couples
    get no pension.
  • 1This is less than total government pensioners,
    because many of them are under 60

7
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • In 21 years from now, the number over 60 is
    likely to double, to around 18 million.
  • We MUST think NOW about pensions for them.
    This issue must be given appropriate priority in
    the national agenda.
  • This is the core issue in the looming crisis.

8
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Existing schemes have limited relevance to
    population over 60
  • Government Schemes cover about 15 of
    Pakistanis aged 60 . If we take couples where
    male is 60 , coverage increases to perhaps 23 
    or so. Assume this proportion will remain
    unchanged.
  • The scope of EOBI has remained un-changed
    since it was set up 31 years ago. At present, it
    provides pensions to only 2 of those over 60.
    If we take couples where male is over 60, then
    cover increases to maybe 3.5 .

9
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Pension schemes of non-government employers
    cover a small number of persons. This is likely
    to continue.
  • Coverage of VPS scheme remains to be seen.
    There are about 1.5 million income tax payers.
    Experience of such schemes in other countries is
    that over long period, perhaps about 40 of
    income tax payers buy such products. Perhaps a
    few non-income-tax payers will find the scheme
    attractive.

10
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Need for a National Basic Pension Scheme
  • One doesn't have to be a genius or rocket
    scientist to realise that Government Pension
    Schemes, EOBI in its present form, pension
    schemes of employers and VPS, all taken together,
    cannot deliver pensions to great majority of 60
    Pakistanis.
  • Problem has been studied by many persons. The
    World Bank's report "Averting the Old-Age
    Crisis", recommended basic pension scheme as
    follows

11
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • It should apply to entire work-force.
  • It should provide subsistence or basic
    pensions, not linked to actual salary or income.
  • Basic pensions should be reviewed annually to
    compensate for inflation.
  • It should be on a pay as you go basis. No
    large Fund should be built up.
  • World Bank's reason for objecting to large
    Fund was that in hands of a Government body, this
    is likely to be mis-invested.

12
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • DC schemes are irrelevant. There is no way
    old Pakistanis can pay for their pensions out of
    accumulated savings. There has to be
    inter-generational transfer, and scheme has to be
    based on open group costing. Such a National
    Basic Pension Scheme is Social Insurance, not
    commercial pension business.
  • Cost methods like Projected Unit Cost (PUC) or
    Entry Age Normal (EAN), vital for schemes of
    industrial or commercial entities, are not
    relevant for National Basic Pension Scheme. These
    cost methods are red herrings, not applicable to
    open groups like EOBI or a National Basic Pension
    Scheme, where new entrants come in by statute.

13
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Conversion of EOBI into National Basic Pension
    Scheme
  • Scope of EOBI was fixed in 1976. Applies to
    establishments with at least 10 employees. Most
    government and semi-government organisations
    excluded. Banks are also excluded.
  • During past 15 or 20 years, several
    Commissions, Committees and individuals have
    recommended that scope of Scheme should be
    extended in phases to cover entire Pakistani work
    force. At the end of this phased expansion there
    would be no exceptions whatsoever.

14
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • No action taken so far on these
    recommendations. These recommendations regarding
    a National Basic Pension Scheme to cover the
    entire work-force should be studied urgently and
    implementation should commence.
  • Regrettably, Finance Act, 2006, took reverse
    step. Thresh-hold for new establishments to join
    EOBI raised to 20 employees. This was zero sum
    game, in favour of owners of establishments with
    10 to 19 employees, against employees. In time,
    the unfortunate 2006 amendment will deprive tens
    of thousands from pensions. One presumes that the
    amendment was made without a full appreciation of
    its implications. It requires reconsideration and
    reversal in 2007.

15
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • On the face of it, the Benefit and
    Contributions of the current EOBI scheme respond
    to the needs of a National Basic Pension Scheme.
    The matter may require further detailed study,
    but perhaps the benefit and contribution
    structure in place at present may not have to be
    disturbed to any substantial extent.

16
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Financial structure of National Basic Pension
    Scheme
  • Financial structure of Pay As You Go schemes
    must provide reasonable financial discipline, to
    ensure that pension promise is sober and will be
    fulfilled. Following methods have been used to do
    this.
  • (a) UK National Insurance system of 1945
    calculated contributions by actuarial formulas,
    assuming entry into scheme at age 16. But scheme
    applied from Day 1 to everybody, even if much
    older than 16. Naturally, pensions of these older
    persons not built up out of life time
    contributions. This method has long since fallen
    out of use.

17
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • (b) Scaled premium method. A scale period is
    selected. Relation between benefits and
    contributions is designed so that benefits
    during any year in the scale period will always
    be covered by total of contributions plus
    investment income in year. This system followed
    by US Social Security when started in 1937.
    Also been followed by EOBI for more than 25
    years.
  • Scaled premium system builds up a Fund. The
    longer the chosen scaling period, the bigger the
    Fund, and the bigger the contribution of
    Investment Income.

18
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • (c) Long-range actuarial balance Only small
    Working Balance is maintained, equal to
    projected benefits during next one or two years.
    Projections are made for long periods (75 years
    in the US), with planned changes in contribution
    rates. Alternative scenarios test whether
    current and planned future contribution rates
    will result in maintaining Working Balance at
    all times.
  • No substantial fund is built up, so investment
    income is relatively small, but influence of
    demographic factors is very important.

19
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Methods (b) and (c) take into account future
    new entrants who will enter scheme under the
    law. In fact, US Social Security, UK National
    Insurance, and other National Pension Schemes
    are always "open group".
  • Which financial structure will suit our
    National Basic Pension Scheme requires careful
    study. But finances will not stand in the way,
    if the political will exists.

20
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Why Employers moving away from Defined Benefit
    Pensions
  • Let us turn to a subject of more immediate
    interest to those present.
  • Suppose pension is defined by Final Salary,
    or Final Average of last few years. Then
    employer is issuing blank cheque. Amount will be
    filled in many years, perhaps decades, later.
    Employer is exposed to future salary risk.
  • Expectation of life after retirement has
    increased more than projected. Employer is
    exposed to longevity risk.

21
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Investment returns can fluctuate. Value of
    pension fund investments can fluctuate,
    especially if invested in shares or long term
    fixed interest bonds.
  • Cost reported under PUC method mandated by IAS
    19 to measure DB liability is unstable. This
    gives rise to measurement risk.
  • Despite these risks, DB schemes dominated for
    decades. Because most comparable employers
    offered DB schemes, employers regarded such
    schemes as necessary to maintain a competitive
    remuneration package.

22
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Financially they worked over long periods,
    because investment returns offset salary
    increases. Entry Age Normal and/or Aggregate
    cost methods used formerly in UK and Pakistan
    stabilised reported pension costs.
  • Employees like these schemes because it gives
    them comfort about the relationship between
    pension and final salary.
  • But many Employers now think there is no good
    business reason to take on future salary,
    longevity, investment and measurement risks of
    DB schemes. It distracts them from their core
    business. It could affect their rating. It could
    impair competitiveness.

23
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Strong body of opinion that problems of DB
    schemes over- rated, that history shows that in
    long run these have worked well. In an article
    in US "Pension Section News" of Jan 2005, Mark
    Ruloff pointed out that DC schemes make employer
    vulnerable to recruitment, retention and morale
    problems.
  • But in business and economic affairs, as in
    height of women's hemlines, there are fashions.
    A few decades ago, conglomerates were in
    fashion. Later, they went out of fashion.
    Mutualisation was in fashion at one time. Now,
    demutualisation is in fashion. In pensions,
    current fashion decidedly favours DC schemes.
    Maybe a decade or two later, DB schemes may come
    back into fashion.

24
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Special problems with DB schemes in important
    countries
  • Economic basis for actuarial valuations of
    pension schemes is critical, namely rate of
    return used to discount liabilities and rates of
    salary increases and pension increases.
  • In a certain large and important country,
    employers decide economic basis for pension
    valuations. Actuaries do not have to comment on
    appropriateness of economic basis.
  • When interest rates were high, employers
    required actuary to use 9 pa or 10 pa to
    discount pension liability, with NO provision
    for pension increases.

25
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Interest rates very often respond to inflation
    rates. So in this way, employers took credit for
    inflation on income side, but ignored its effect
    on outgo side. The economic basis was internally
    inconsistent.
  • They justified this by not giving increases to
    pensioners even in relatively high inflation
    conditions, which is unfair.
  • When interest rates fell, discounting rate
    fell, reported pension liability increased
    sharply, which translated into lower reported
    profits.

26
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Also, in many important countries large
    investments in ordinary shares resulted in
    contribution holidays when share market was up,
    and big deficits when market went down.
  • These sharp fluctuations in reported profits
    were aggravated by Projected Unit Credit cost
    method mandated by accounting standards.
  • DB schemes became unpopular with
    share-holders, accountants and analysts.

27
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Scenario in Pakistan
  • Outside EOBI and Government and Defence
    Personnel, pension schemes are relatively few.
    Some, but not all, multi-nationals and some
    public sector organisations have such schemes.
    Hardly any Pakistani private sector organisation
    has pension schemes.
  • The economic valuation bases of almost all
    Pakistani pension schemes have generally been
    internally consistent. In high inflation
    conditions, high interest rates were offset by
    assuming correspondingly high salary increase
    rates and also pension increases.

28
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • The few Pakistani pension schemes that exist
    are in fairly good shape. Pakistani actuaries
    can take some credit for this.
  • But Pakistani subsidiaries of multi-nationals
    in Pakistan have to accept directives of
    parents, based on experience in their home
    countries.
  • Hardly any new pension schemes set up in
    recent past.
  • Many existing DB pension schemes have been
    converted to DC. One or two have been shut down
    altogether. In some cases, the Employer has
    offered 100 commutation, so that he sheds all
    his risks.

29
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Risks borne by Employer and individual
    participants
  • Generic problems include (a) Final salary
    risk, i.e. risk that pension will not be
    reasonably related to final salary
    (b) Investment risk during service (c)
    investment risk after retirement and (d)
    Longevity risk.
  • Table 3 analyses these risks. To complete the
    picture, DB Gratuity Schemes --- still very
    prevalent ---- and Provident Fund schemes have
    been included. Also individual savings outside
    any scheme. Employers, employees and individuals
    can use Table 3 as a menu for selecting their
    path forward, having regard to their own
    circumstances.

30
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Table 3
  • Analysis of risks by Employer and Employee/
    participant


23/4E because some schemes require employee
contributions, he gets no tax relief on
this. 31/2E because Employee must contribute at
least half of cost, gets no tax relief on this.
31
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Table 3 (cont'd)

4Tax regime assumes funded gratuity 53/4T
because 1/4 accumulated amount can be taken tax
free 6Because income draw down schemes will
assume 100 survival to age 75 7Too complicated
to summarise. Income tax relief on Mutual Funds.
No relief on other saving.

32
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Remarks on Table 3
  • The investment return objective for retirement
    planning must be real yield, net of tax, net of
    inflation (and, if applicable, net of zakat).
  • Net of above factors, no investment in
    Pakistan8 offers safety of income or capital.
    Real yields can alter sharply, but are probably
    more stable than nominal yields.
  • The benchmark on nominal (not real) safety of
    capital is yield on Government Securities.
  • 8In the UK, USA, Canada, France, and other
    countries, Index linked Government Securities
    offer such safety of capital and income.

33
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • The pre-tax IRR on SSC's if held to 3 year
    maturity is 9.34. Provident or DC Pension Funds
    would get this. Net of inflation at current
    level of 7.59, yield would be 1.71 pa10.
  • Would 1.71 pa keep up with net-of-inflation
    salary increases? Probably not, especially if
    promotions are reckoned. This Final Salary Risk
    is transferred to Employees under DC schemes.
    Over working career of 35 years, it could have
    substantial effect on money available on
    retirement.
  • A retiree holding SSC's to redemption would
    get a net of inflation net of tax IRR of only
    0.84 p.a.
  • 9In this presentation, inflation has been taken
    everywhere at current level of 7.5 pa
  • 10((1.0934/1.075)-1)100

34
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Bahbood pays 0.96 per month pre-tax, IRR
    12.15 pa. Retiree holding maximum Rs 3 million
    would get IRR 3.25 net of inflation and tax, if
    he pays 10 tax at end of year. His income after
    10 tax is Rs 25,920 p.m. But he should spend
    only Rs 8,125 p m in first year, and re-invest
    difference of Rs 17,795 to maintain real income
    in Year 2. But hardly anybody does this. Retiree
    will gradually be impoverished.
  • Ordinary shares dividends have in past
    maintained purchasing power better than income
    on fixed interest investments. But under "life
    cycle" concept, a retired person would move out
    of ordinary shares by the time he retires!

35
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • A paper in the North American Actuarial
    Journal studied this question in depth. The
    authors' conclusion was that there is no
    evidence to support the "life cycle" concept.
  • Employers who prefer DC pension schemes should
    not just walk away from the risks transferred to
    employees. They should perhaps have non-binding
    targets of retirement income, monitor the
    progress of such schemes measured against this
    target, and make "course corrections" if
    required.

36
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Employers, asset managers, investment
    advisers, bankers etc, should be candid with
    employees and participants.
  • Retirement planning, and sales illustrations,
    should be on yields net of inflation, and net of
    income tax and asset manager's charges, if
    applicable.
  • Net of above factors, risk adjusted yields
    will probably be under 2 pa on a fixed return
    portfolio, maybe around 3 pa if a limited
    proportion acceptable to the retiree is in
    ordinary shares. This realistic picture will
    encourage higher saving rates. Unrealistic
    pictures based on double digit yields will lower
    savings rates, causing disappointment and
    disillusion, which could boomerang.

37
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • The effect of Improving Mortality on annuity
    business
  • On studying experience of more than 40 years
    in Pakistani pension schemes, especially those
    for management, Akhtar Hasan found a
    considerable improvement in mortality of
    relatively well-to-do Pakistanis, like those here
    today.
  • This improvement will continue. It is always
    hard to project future improvement. But
    actuaries have to stick their necks out and make
    some estimate. Allowing for projected future
    improvement, here is how we estimate survival
    rates among well to do Pakistanis.

38
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Table 4
  • Projected survival probabilities of Pakistani
    management pensioners

39
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • Only time will tell whether survival of VPS
    participants will follow this experience. But it
    is prudent to assume that they will have light
    mortality.
  • The high probability of survival to age 75
    means that compulsory annuitisation at that age
    under VPS scheme, is a real possibility and has
    to be reckoned with. In fairness, VPS sellers
    should be ready to answer questions on this.

40
S Akhtar Hasan (Pvt) LtdActuaries, Karachi,
Pakistan
  • For life insurer, annuities are a difficult
    market. Prudent estimates of longevity have to
    be made. Improving longevity also means it may
    be hard to find matching investments, which
    means prudent yield estimates.
  • Annuity rates which insurer's Appointed
    Actuary is prepared to certify as prudent for
    the insurer may be thoroughly unattractive for
    buyer.
  • This could be Achilles Heel of VPS system.
  • High chances of surviving to old ages may call
    for a new paradigm, to replace the age old
    annuity concept.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com