Title: Tracking Cosmic Ray Muons Using a Cloud Chamber
1Tracking Cosmic Ray Muons Using a Cloud Chamber
- Leah Wilson and Lori Wilson
- duPont Manual High School
- and
- Dr. Akhtar Mahmood
- Bellarmine University
KAPT 2009 SPRING MEETING MARCH 7,
2009 BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY
2Purpose and Hypothesis
- Cosmic rays are all around us, one type of cosmic
ray that strikes the earth is a muon (µ). - On average, one muon strikes the fingertip every
single minute. - In order to determine the muon flux count (number
of muons hitting the earths surface in a given
area per minute), a cloud chamber was constructed
out of a basketball display case to determine the
muon flux in the Louisville area. - This experiment was conducted at Bellarmine
University in a Physics Lab. - The muon flux count obtained by our cloud chamber
was also compared with the muon flux data
obtained on-line from the Cosmic Ray Detector
located at SLACs (Stanford Linear Accelerator
Center) Visitors Center.
3Background Information
- The history of cosmic rays started in the
beginning of the 20th century. - In 1912, Victor Hess was in his hot air balloon
soaring at an altitude of about 5,000 meters.
When he was sailing around he noticed
penetrating radiation coming from outer space. - Following the ideas of Hess was Robert Millikan
in 1925 who introduced the name cosmic rays. - In 1929 Dimitry Skobelzyn built the first cloud
chamber to test the theory of cosmic rays.
4Background Information
- In 1935, the Explorer II balloon mission ascended
to 22,066 meters in space while collecting data
about cosmic rays. - In 1937, Seth Neddermeyer and Carl Anderson
discovered the muon using a cloud chamber. - In a major discovery in 1938, Pierre Auger
discovered "extensive air showers" in the outer
atmosphere. These showers were made up of
secondary subatomic particles caused by the
collision of high-energy cosmic rays with air
molecules, which is now defined as a cosmic ray
shower. - In 1947, Cecil Powell of Bristol University in
the United Kingdom, discovered a new type of
cosmic ray called the pion (?).
Explorer II balloon
5Background Information (contd)
- Most muons come from what are known as cosmic
rays. A muon is roughly 200 times heavier than an
electron. - There are two categories of cosmic rays primary
and secondary cosmic rays. - Primary cosmic rays can generally be defined as
all particles that come to earth from outer
space. - When these primary cosmic rays hit Earth's
atmosphere, they ionize the atmosphere forming a
shower of matter and anti-matter particles.
6Background Information (contd)
- This is where the muons come from they are the
results of an interaction between a proton (which
are abundant in the universe) and the atmosphere
that produces a pion that decays into a muon,
among other particles. - Primary cosmic rays are particles such as a
single proton (nuclei of hydrogen about 90 of
all cosmic rays) traveling through the
interstellar medium. Most of these originate
outside of the solar system (i.e. from
Supernovae), but some of them come from the sun. - When such a high-energy proton hits the earth's
atmosphere at around 30000m above the surface, it
will collide with a nuclei of the atmospheric gas
molecules. As a result of this collision, many
secondary particles are produced, including lots
of particles called pions.
7Background Information (contd)
- A (charged) pion decays to a muon and two
muon-neutrinos (which is neutral therefore can
not be seen) at about 10000m (10 km) altitude. - Some of these muons can make it through the
earth's atmosphere which can be detected and
measured using a suitable particle detector (such
as a cloud chamber or a muon detector) at the
earth's surface. In cosmic ray showers, both
muons and anti-muons are produced. - Although the muon at rest has a lifetime of only
2.2 µs, it should have decayed after traveling a
distance of only 660m. Thus one would conclude
that muons produced at this high altitude of
10000m from earth should not reach the ground. - But muons can travel all the way down from a
height of 10000m (10 km) above the surface of the
earth while traveling at 99.8 the speed of
light.
8Background Information (contd)
- The reason is that according to Einsteins
Special Theory of Relativity, the muons age more
slowly (in fact, about 16 times) since they are
traveling very fast at about 99.8 the speed of
light. This effect is called time-dilation. - From the point of view of an observer on Earth
the muons new lifetime can be determined from
Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity.
- c speed of light, v speed of the muon which
is 0.998c. (I.e. 99.8 the speed of light) and t0
lifetime of muon at rest which is 2.2 x
10-6 s. - Thus this relativistic time dilation allows the
muon to travel about 16 times farther (10000m
instead of 657m) than would have been expected
otherwise.
9Background Information (contd)
- We hypothesized that a using a cloud chamber, the
muon flux count rate will be at least a factor of
10 or less since we are using our naked eye to
detect the muon tracks instead of the
sophisticated muon detector. - The latitudes of Palo Alto (37?) and Louisville
(38?) are very close (within 1? of each other). - Whereas Palo Altos elevation is about 262 ft.,
and Louisvilles about 466 ft. The elevation of
difference of about 200 ft should not result in
any significant difference in the muon flux count
rate except for the resolution of the two types
of detectors.
10Background Information (contd)
- When a charged particle passes through a
particular substance it can ionize the
surrounding particles and leave a trail. - For example, in a cloud chamber, the air is
cooled to the point that when an atmospheric
particle is ionized, it will cause the air to
condense and thus leaves a visible trail. - The cloud chamber is essentially saturated with
alcohol vapor. The dry ice keeps the bottom very
cold, while the top is at room temperature. The
high temperature at the top of the chamber means
that the alcohol in the felt produces a lot of
vapor, which falls downwards. The low temperature
at the bottom means that once the vapor has
fallen, it is supercooled. It is in a vapor form,
but at a temperature at which vapor normally
can't exist. Since the vapor is at a temperature
where it normally can't exist, it will very
easily condense into liquid form. - When an electrically charged cosmic ray comes
along, it ionizes the vapor--that is, tears away
the electrons in some of the gas atoms along its
path. This leaves these atoms positively charged
(since it removed electrons, which have negative
charge). Other nearby atoms are attracted to this
ionized atom. This is enough to start the
condensation process.
11Types of Cosmic Ray Muon Tracks
- The Figure on the left is an example of a cosmic
ray muon track. - The muon track can be seen coming straight which
then "kinks" off to the left sharply after
knocking off an electron from the atom in the
material.
Example of a Muon Track
12- Figure to the left is an example of a very jagged
muon track. This is known as "multiple
scattering", where a low-energy cosmic ray
bounces off of one atom in the air to the next. - Figure to the left is the third example of a muon
track. It shows a muon decaying into an electron
and two neutrinos (actually one electron-neutrino
and one anti-electron neutrino)
Another Example of a Muon Track
Yet Another Example of a Muon Track
13Procedure
- The cloud chamber was constructed to consistently
produce an environment - where muon tracks could be detected.
- Felt pads were saturated with 91 isopropyl
alcohol inside of the chamber (only on the top
and bottom sides) with the goal of creating a
super-saturated atmosphere of alcohol within the
chamber. - The chamber was then set on a block of dry ice
and was cooled to create the required environment
for muon detection.
14Procedure (contd)
- To build the cloud chamber the following
materials were needed - - A basketball display box, a conducting sheet of
metal, silicon cement, razor blades,
weather-strip, black felt, four push-pins,
Windex, 91 pure isopropyl alcohol and - paper towels.
- First, we replaced the bottom of the display box
with the thin sheet of conducting metal. - We used silicon cement to ensure firm
placement of the metal at the bottom. - Next, we took the same silicon cement
- and ran it around the inside and outside
edges of the display box to make sure that no air
will be able to get into the box when the
experiment is going on.
15Pasteur Hall
16Procedure (contd)
17Procedure (contd)
- We placed the cloud chamber on top of the dry ice
block and then turned off the lights and shone a
high intensity light through the center/side of
the chamber. - We waited for the fog to form at the bottom and
begin to time the twenty minutes. - At every minute mark, we tallied the number of
cosmic rays observed within the twenty minutes
and repeated the experiment five times.
18CLOUD CHAMBER RESULTS
19Results
The cosmic ray muons detected in each 20 minute
five trial run varied from 0 17.
This figure shows the average number of muons per
minute.
This figure shows the same results, charted in a
bar graph.
This figure shows the average number of muons per
minute in each trial.
20Results (contd)
These are the actual pictures of muons tracks
that were detected inside the cloud chamber we
built.
21Conclusion
- The experimental data supported the goal of this
research project, which was to measure the muon
flux in Louisville. - During a 100-minute time frame in 5 different
trials, a total of 593 muons were observed or and
average of about 119 muons per 20 minutes.
Therefore we detected an average of 6 muons per
minute. - The limitation of the experimental setup was the
effective area of observation was about one-ninth
of the size of the box, due to the location of
the light source that was directed at the cloud
chamber. - The chamber measured 30 cm (L) x 30cm (W), which
equals an area of 900cm2, whereas the effective
dimension of focus was about - 10 cm (L) x 10cm (W) which gives the
effective area of focus of about 100 cm2.
22Conclusion (contd)
SLAC Cosmic Ray Detector Data (Muon flux
count rate)
23Conclusion (contd)
- The SLAC data shows that the muon flux in Palo
Alto was anywhere from 0.3 - 0.9 muons/min/cm2 or
an average muon flux of 0.6
muons/min/cm2 of during that time which
corresponds to - 60 muons/min/100cm2, to match with our
effective area of observation which was about
100cm2. - Our hypothesis predicted that with a cloud
chamber the expected resolution would be about
ten times less (10 or less). - Our cloud chamber experiment detected a mean flux
of 6 muons/min/100cm2 (or
0.06 events/minute/cm2) which was consistent with
the hypothesis regarding the resolution of this
experimental setup.
24Awards and Recognition
- March 7, 2008
- duPont Manual Science and Engineering Fair
- 2nd Place Team in Physical Science
25Awards and Recognition
- March 29, 2008
- (KYSEF) Kentucky Science and Engineering Fair
- Certificate for 1st Place Team
- Trophy for Best of Fair high school Team Project
- University of Kentucky Presidential Scholarship
for 1st place prize in State Competition - University of Louisville Trustee Scholarship for
1st place prize in State Competition
26Awards and Recognition
- April 14, 2008
- Certificate of Recognition for duPont Manual High
School Kentucky Science and Engineering Fair
Winner presented by Jefferson County Board of
Education
27Awards and Recognition
- April 19, 2008
- Kentucky Junior Academy of Science (KJAS) 1st
Place Winner
28Awards and Recognition
- May 11-16 2008
- Finalist at the INTEL International Science and
Engineering Fair - Certificate Presented by Agilent Technologies