Regionalism and Metropolitan Government - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Regionalism and Metropolitan Government

Description:

Long history (NYC, Boston, Phila, New Orleans and St. Louis all in the 1800s) ... Benefits of Cooperation. Economic growth. Lower racial/class segregation. More equity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: josephs150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regionalism and Metropolitan Government


1
Regionalism and Metropolitan Government
  • Dr. Joseph Stefko
  • Department of Political Science
  • University at Buffalo, SUNY
  • Spring 2007

2
Thinking Regionally
  • Regionalism or metropolitan reform
  • Growing in importance for two reasons
  • Many policy issues transcend local boundaries
  • Too many governmental units yields inefficiency

3
Historical Origins of Regionalism
  • Dates back to 19th century
  • First efforts to annex, merge and consolidate
  • View of the city as the primary local government
  • Examples of annexation and consolidation
  • Working models for what could be done

4
Fundamental Problem of the Metro
  • Political fragmentation
  • Division of metro area into numerous overlapping
    units with fragmented decision-making authority
  • Numerous taxing entities
  • Autonomous municipal responsibilities
  • Implications of fragmentation

5
Parochialism
  • Focusing exclusively at the most local level
  • Interests, policies, values that meet localized
    objectives, regardless of whether they are
    consistent with regional objectives
  • Fragmentation begets parochialism
  • How?
  • Examples

6
Externalities
  • Where costs/benefits resulting from a market
    transaction or policy are not confined only to
    those directly involved in it
  • Secondary effects
  • Costs/benefits reach others
  • Examples

7
What enables parochialism?
  • Federated system of government
  • History of home rule
  • Legitimate claim to zoning/planning power

8
Rusk and Orfield on Fragmentation
  • Greater levels of residential segregation
  • Social and fiscal instability in cities
  • Concentrated need v. Concentrated resources
  • Zero-sum competition for econ development
  • Growth of parts at the expense of the whole
  • Weak city schools

9
How Fragmented are We?
  • Average U.S. metropolitan area
  • 2 counties
  • 24 cities/villages
  • 16 towns
  • 19 school districts
  • 43 special districts
  • 104 total government units

10
How Fragmented are We?
  • Buffalo Niagara Metro Area
  • 2 counties
  • 26 cities/villages
  • 37 towns
  • 39 special districts
  • 37 school districts
  • 141 total government units

11
The Fundamental Problem
  • The metropolitan problem
  • Holden This is a problem in democracy
  • Has fragmentation worsened?
  • Parochial institutions act parochially!
  • Orfield quote (p 10)
  • The absence of regional institutions

12
Fixing the Problem
  • Historically, annexation has been the solution
  • But not so much recently
  • Creating regional institutions
  • But its extremely difficult Why?
  • Consolidation
  • Often attempted, rarely implemented

13
City-County Consolidation
  • Combining the two largest govts in a region
  • Long history (NYC, Boston, Phila, New Orleans and
    St. Louis all in the 1800s)
  • Lots of interest since WWII
  • 32 consolidated city-counties today
  • Lots of attempts since 1970 since 1990

14
Consolidation is Difficult
  • Majority of attempts at city-county consolidation
    are rejected by voters
  • Reasons for the difficulty
  • Built-in opposition
  • Suburban separation
  • Fragmentation is exaggerated
  • Does it really save money
  • Democratic preference

15
Charles Tiebout
  • 1956 A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
  • The fundamental problem isnt a problem
  • Choice among communities is good
  • Individuals vote with their feet
  • Citizens can choose what community they want
  • Variety among communities is good

16
Benefits of Cooperation
  • Economic growth
  • Lower racial/class segregation
  • More equity
  • Correlation between city/suburb/metro economies

17
Walkers Regional Approaches
  • Informal cooperation
  • Service contracts
  • Joint powers agreements
  • Extraterritorial powers
  • Council of governments
  • Single-purpose regional bodies

18
Walkers Regional Approaches
  • Local special district governments
  • Transfer of functions
  • Annexation
  • Regional special districts
  • Metropolitan multipurpose districts

19
Intensive Regional Approaches
  • City-county consolidation
  • Two-tier restructuring

20
Orfields Metropolitics
  • Background
  • Redundancies with Rusk
  • Concentrated need v. Concentrated resources
  • Indirect relationship btwn social need tax base
  • Failure of urban schools
  • Suburbs (w/o affordable housing) dominate job
    growth
  • Spatial mismatch results

21
Orfields Metropolitics
  • Building a coalition (key lesson of the book)
  • The schools as a warning sign
  • Affordable housing and the tax base
  • Regional Fair Share Housing
  • Fiscal Disparities System
  • Metropolitan Council

22
Lessons of Metropolitics
  • Understand regional demographics, and map it!
  • Reach out and organize on a personal level
  • Build a broad, inclusive coalition
  • Its the older suburbs, stupid!
  • Make sure the city understands the message
  • Seek out the religious community

23
Lessons of Metropolitics
  • Use philanthropic community, business groups
  • Draw in distinct but compatible issues, orgs
  • Seek out the media
  • Prepare for controversy
  • Move on several fronts and accept compromise
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com