Title: Crystal collimation for LHC
1Crystal collimation for LHC
- Valery Biryukov
- IHEP Protvino
- Vincenzo Guidi
- Ferrara University and INFN
- Walter Scandale
- CERN
- CERN, Geneva, 24 April 2003
2Borrowed from Ray Flillers talk at Paris EPAC
2002
3Crystal Channeling
4Beam line (70 m long) made of 3 crystals, IHEP
5 6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11Crystal design as used at IHEP Protvino and RHIC
Crystal is 3 to 5 mm along the beam
12(No Transcript)
13Crystal
SQUEEZE
Beam Direction
5mm
Crystal Courtesy of IHEP, Protvino
14New crystal design (strip) gave 85 efficiency
at IHEP
15(No Transcript)
16Typical beam phase space at crystal location, IHEP
171- circulating beam, 2- extracted beam, IHEP
18Crystal extraction efficiency as measured since
Dec 1997.85 is measured even when all stored
beam is dumped onto crystal
19(No Transcript)
20Deflected (left) and incident (right) beams as
seen downstream of the crystal
- Prior to the test, the crystal was exposed in the
ring to 50-ms pulses of very intense beam (about
1014 proton hits per pulse). - No damage of crystal was seen in the test, after
this extreme exposure.
21Beam profile at collimator face with NO crystal,
70 GeV
22Misaligned x
23Crystal collimation
24Effy vs Energy
2545 GeV
2612 GeV
27Crystal lifetime is order of 51020 proton/cm2
28RHIC Crystal Collimator Setup
8 Upstream PIN diodes
4 Downstream PIN diodes
Data fill focus on upstream PIN diodes
29Layout of RHIC experiment on crystal collimation
30(No Transcript)
31RHIC measurements, EPAC 2002
32Simulations of LHC crystal collimation
33Simulations with smaller bending, 0.1 mrad
34Two bending options compared 0.2 and 0.1 mrad
35Efficiency vs bending angle
36Background suppression factor vs crystal bending
37FNAL simulations for Tevatron crystal scraping,
PAC 1999
38Conclusion
- Simulations and experiments promise
- 10-fold improvement in backgrounds
- at TeV accelerators if bent crystal is used as
primary scraper. - No problems with high intensity or lifetime.
39Extraction parameters
- Protons
- Energy at 1.3-70 GeV
- Intensity 1012 protons in spills of 2 s duration
- Efficiency greater than 85
- Equivalent to 1000 T dipole magnetic field
Extraction efficiency vs. crystal length at 70
GeV
40Structure of the bending crystal
- Dimensions 0.5?2?50mm3
- 1/R? is the curvature experienced by channelled
protons
41Bending device
- Bending exploits anticlastic effects due to
anysotropy of crystalline Si - For the (111) direction the sample takes the
shape of a saddle
42Preparation of the Si samples I
- Starting material is prime-grade, (111) oriented
525-?m-thick silicon wafer - In previous runs there came out that a surface
layer as thick as 30 ?m was rich in scratches,
dislocations, line defects and anomalies that
would reduce channelling efficiency - Such a layer originated in the mechanical cutting
for manufacturing the samples - Thus we attempted removal of the layer
43Preparation of the Si samples II
- Preliminary cleaning to organic and metallic
impurities from the surface of the wafers by
H2O2, NH4OH, HF, HCl,... - Coverage of the largest surfaces by Apiezon wax
- Cutting of the samples by a diamond-blade saw
avoiding alignment with major crystalline axes. - Planar etching (HF, HNO3 and CH3COOH, 2155)
with a timing set for 30 ?m thinning.
More info in Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 (2002)
3170-3173
44Images of the beam deflected through
mechanically treated (left) and chemically
polished crystals (right)