Muon Fake Rates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Muon Fake Rates

Description:

charge, |DZ| 5 cm, 20 |Df| 900, 1 leg Pt 5 ... Muon phi [degrees] 08/06/2002 p. 8. Muon Fake Rates. Petra Merkel. Fake Rate different datasets ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: alan144
Category:
Tags: berryhill | degree | fake | muon | rates

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Muon Fake Rates


1
Muon Fake Rates
  • Concept determine rate of
  • fake muons due to pion/kaon punch-through (PT)
  • muons out of pion/kaon decay-in-flight (DIF)
  • METHOD 1 Use source of identified high-pt
    pions/kaons
  • reconstruct Ks pp
  • reconstruct D0 Kp
  • METHOD 2 Use generic tracks (min bias)
  • METHOD 3 Use simulated pions and kaons (fake
    event)


2
Ks Selection
  • Use B_CHARM dataset
  • L1 (2 XFT tracks, opp. charge, Df lt 1350 , SPt
    gt 5.5) or (7 tracks w/ Pt gt 2)
  • L2 2 SVT tracks, c2 lt 25, Pt gt 2, 100 mm lt d0
    lt 1 mm
  • L3 2 SVX-COT hybrid tracks, Pt gt 2, h lt 1.2,
    120 mm lt d0 lt 1 mm,
  • opp. charge, DZ0 lt 5 cm, 20 lt Df lt
    900, Lxy gt 200 mm, SPt gt 5.5
  • Offline selection
  • Track cuts Nax gt 24, Nst gt 24, Z0 lt 60 cm,
    h lt 1.2, Pt gt 2
  • Track pairs opp. charge, DZ lt 5 cm, 20 lt
    Df lt 900, 1 leg Pt gt 5
  • Secondary vertex fit CTVMFT algorithm, x2 lt 8,
    Lxy gt 1 cm,
  • d0(Ks) lt
    0.3 mm (SVX) / d0(Ks) lt 0.3 cm (COT)


3
Ks Peak BCHARM sample
Peak 0.46 lt Mpp lt 0.53 SB 0.425 lt Mpp lt 0.46
0.53 lt Mpp lt 0.565
Mpp GeV

4
Pions Kinematics
d0 (COT)
d0 (SVX)
peak
sideband
eta
d0 (SVX) both legs have silicon hits d0 (COT)
only one leg or none have silicon hits

Pt GeV
5
Muon Cuts
  • Use same cuts as in s(W mn) analysis
    (summer)
  • Tracking Nax gt 24, Nst gt 24
  • Calorimeter, isolation E(Rlt0.4)corrected for
    track lt 2
  • (will apply this later, study fake rate as
    function of iso)
  • Calorimeter, MIP Eem lt max(2, 20.0115 (Pt
    100))
  • Ehad lt max(6,
    60.028 (Pt 100))
  • Matching DxCMU lt 3 cm, DxCMP lt 6 cm, (no
    cut for CMX)

6
Fake Rate Ks
  • Ks in peak 74,843
  • (Ptgt2) 149,686
  • is m 598 0.40 - 0.02
    Muon fake rate from
  • is CMU m 405 0.27 - 0.01
    PT and DIF
  • is CMP m 183 0.12 - 0.01
  • is CMUP m 133 0.09 - 0.01
    peak SB
  • is CMX m 146 0.10 - 0.01
    all m 0.38 - 0.02

  • CMU m 0.26 -
    0.01
  • Events in SB 2,925
    CMP m 0.11 - 0.01
  • p (Ptgt2) 5,850
    CMUP m 0.08 - 0.01
  • p is m 52 0.89 -
    0.12 CMX m 0.09 - 0.01
  • p is CMU m 26 0.44 - 0.09
  • p is CMP m 19 0.32 - 0.07
  • p is CMUP m 13 0.22 - 0.06
  • p is CMX m 21 0.36 - 0.08


7
Fake Rate differential distributions
Muon phi degrees

8
Fake Rate different datasets
ELECTRON
BTST2
BCHARM
PHOTON
DIPHOTON
ALL

9
Fake Rate data and MC
DATA
MC
10
Other samples
electron sample
photon sample

Mpp GeV
Mpp GeV
11
Physics Bias ?
Study physics bias in different data samples
fakerate dependent on business of
the event In muon enriched samples the pion
track gets accidentally matched to the stub from
a real muon nearby Check 1 loosen / tighten
Dx cut on CMU, CMP fake rate / Check 2
difference between isolated/non-isolated
tracks/muons ?

12
Muon Matching
Tendency also seen in electron datasetbut within
statistical error
Dxlt15 cm Dx lt 3 / 6 cm Dx lt 1 cm
ELECTRONS
BCHARM
BCHARM dataset (two-track trigger) is muon
enriched (heavy flavor)

13
Track Isolation
pions from Ks pions from D0 kaons from D0

BCHARM
PHOTONS
ELECTRONS
DIPHOTONS
14
D0 Selection
  • Based on same BCHARM dataset as Ks selection
  • Selection close to the one in the D0 branching
    ratio analysis
  • Use only SVT matched offline tracks
  • foffline fSVT lt 0.015 , curvoffline
    curvSVT lt 0.00015 , c2SVT lt 25 , NSVXrf gt 3
  • Extra cleanup
  • d01 d02 lt 0 (for K-p pair)
  • not used reconstruct D peak (D-gtD0 ps) , cut
    on q(ps) ! q(K) ,
  • cut on Dm m(Kpps)-m(Kp)

15
D0 Peak
Peak 1.83 1.90 GeV Sidebands 1.765 1.80
1.93 1.965 GeV
MKp GeV
16
Fake Rate D0

17
Fake Rate diff. distr.
  • from Ks
  • from D0
  • K from D0

18
Fake Rate charge dependence
  • from Ks
  • from D0
  • K from D0

19
Comparison to Run1 Numbers
  • Method in Run1
  • use inclusive photon sample, look for isolated
    high-pt tracks therein
  • compute probability for PT per track from
    hadronic interaction lengths
  • compute probability for DIF per track from ctp /
    ctK
  • sum over all high-pt tracks in sample
  • see Thesis by J.Berryhill, PRD of note 5569 no
    dedicated note found
  • Results
  • In Run1
  • 1.87 - 0.99 PT background events
  • 1.08 - 1.20 DIF background events
  • 2.95 - 2.19 background events DIFPT
  • Using (0.49 - 0.04) fake rate for Run2 (1/3 K
    2/3 p)
  • Combine with 398 high-Pt tracks
  • 1.95 - 0.16 - 0.88 background events
    estimated with this method (DIFPT)


20
METHOD 3 Single Pions and Kaons - 1
Simulate single pions and kaons with fake-event
generator 10 particles per event flat pt
spectrum apply track and muon cuts as in METHOD
1 Pions
Kaons 0.24 - 0.02
(all tracks) 0.58 - 0.03
0.31 - 0.06 (ptlt5 GeV)
0.68 - 0.09 55.5 are DIF
67.9 are DIF

21
METHOD 3 Single Pions and Kaons - 2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com