IEEE%20802.20%20Technology%20Selection%20Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IEEE%20802.20%20Technology%20Selection%20Process

Description:

... 20 website, at least 30 calendar days before a working group interim or ... Submit and post amended proposals at least 14 days prior to the next WG session ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: dan119
Learn more at: https://www.ieee802.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IEEE%20802.20%20Technology%20Selection%20Process


1
IEEE 802.20 Technology Selection Process
  • Presentation of Contribution C802.20-04-72
  • Dan Gal
  • Berlin, September 14, 2004

2
Introduction
  • This is the presentation version of contribution
    C802.20-04-xx, a proposal for IEEE 802.20
    technology selection process (TSP)
  • Purpose Start a working group discussion and
    trigger follow-up contributions for an
    agreed-upon technology selection procedure
  • Goal Adopt a TSP in the November 2004 plenary
    meeting.

3
Outline
  • This TSP proposal includes
  • Suggested process ground rules
  • Selection process stages
  • Form templates
  • A list of open issues that require additional
    contributions and working group resolutions.

4
TSP Elements
  • Define Technology Proposal submission rules
  • Define a scoring system
  • Define selection rules
  • Identify decision criteria issues that require
    working group resolution

5
Section 1 - Introduction
  • This proposal is not a complete procedure
  • It is recommended that an agreed upon TSP be
    adopted before the call for 802.20 proposals

6
Section 2.1 Document Precedence
  • In case of a conflict with the rules, the
    applicable IEEE SA rules, as well as the 802.20
    rules, shall have higher precedence than the TSP

7
Section 2.3.1 Proposal Submission Rules
  • Technology proposals shall include five parts
  • Part I Technical Specifications Summary (section
    2.3.2).
  • Part II Technology Description (section 2.3.3).
  • Part III PHY/MAC specifications (section 2.3.4).
  • Part IV Evaluation Criteria simulations results
    (section 2.3.5).
  • Part V Compliance statement (section 2.3.6).

8
Section 2.3.1 Proposal Submission Rules
  • Proposals need not be fully compliant with the
    802.20 SRD in order to be considered for the
    technology selection process
  • Proposals shall comply with the IEEE 802 SA
    patent policies

9
Section 2.3.2 Tech Proposal Part ITechnical
Specifications Summary
  • Use SRD as a reference, specify values and
    indicate ranking

10
Section 2.3.3 Tech Proposal Part IITechnology
Description
  • Detailed technical description of the technology
  • Use engineering white paper style
  • Show how the proposal meets or exceeds the SRD
    requirements

11
Section 2.3.4 Tech Proposal Part IIIPHY, MAC
Specifications
  • Style and level of detail -- similar to IEEE 802
    standards

12
Section 2.3.5 Tech Proposal Part IVPerformance
Evaluation Results
  • Evaluation Criteria test results
  • Use a uniform tech report template (TBD)

13
Section 2.3.6 Tech Proposal Part VSRD
Compliance Statement
  • A fully compliant proposal has no entries in the
    P column

14
Section 2.3.7 Tech ProposalsSubmission
  • Comply with the call for proposals requirements
  • Post on the 802.20 website, at least 30 calendar
    days before a working group interim or plenary
    meeting.

15
Section 2.3.7 Tech ProposalsPresentation
  • Presentation material shall be fully consistent
    with the text of the formal proposal.
  • In case of inconsistencies, the formal proposal
    shall prevail and a corrected presentation shall
    be submitted ASAP
  • Presentations shall be treated like WG
    contribution and shall be allowed adequate time
    slots on the meeting agenda
  • Generate meeting minutes of all presentations and
    associated QA

16
Section 2.3.8 Tech ProposalsAmendment
Consolidation
  • Amended proposals shall not include significant
    changes (that affect performance)
  • Submit and post amended proposals at least 14
    days prior to the next WG session
  • Consolidated proposals shall be considered new
    proposal

17
Section 2.3.9 Tech ProposalsScoring System
(slide 1)
  • The scoring system shall consist of a list of the
    most essential (quantitative and qualitative)
    performance attributes required of a winning
    proposal
  • A weighted average scoring system shall be
  • Collect individual member scores and calculate
    the group average scores (tables 3 and 4)

18
Section 2.3.9 Tech ProposalsScoring System
(slide 2)
19
Section 2.3.9 Tech ProposalsScoring System
(slide 3)
20
Section 2.3.9 Tech ProposalsScoring System
(slide 4)
  • Issues the WG needs to resolve
  • Establish the most essential requirements try
    to keep the list short (lt 20 items)
  • Assign averaging weights

21
Section 2.3.9 Tech ProposalsScoring System
(slide 5)
  • The scoring process shall be conducted in a
    plenary session
  • Final scores shall be posted on the WG website
    prior to the next step the voting rounds

22
Section 2.3.10 Tech ProposalsSelection Rounds
  • The selection of the winning proposal shall
    assure that the most meritorious proposal is
    chosen.
  • The scoring process shall be conducted in a
    plenary session
  • Elimination rounds followed by selection among
    the two finalists
  • Voting of the winning proposal must be consistent
    with the scoring results, evaluation results and
    compliance tables.

23
Section 2.4 Tech ProposalsSelection Stages
  • Phase 1
  • Stage 1 Proposal submissions.
  • Stage 2 Working-group Presentations
  • Stage 3 Review proposal compliance tables and
    evaluation results
  • Stage 4 Poll and document the member-scores
  • Stage 5 Proposal elimination (round 1)
    select the top-two proposals
  • Stage 6 If proposal consolidation is
    requested, skip to Phase 2 below, otherwise,
    move to round 2 and select the
    winning proposal.
  • Stage 7 Finalize the technology selection
    process.
  • Phase 2 (optional, follow from stage 6 of
    Phase 1 above)
  • Stage 1 Consolidated proposals submission
  • Stage 2 Working-group Presentations
  • Stage 3 Review proposal compliance tables and
    evaluation results
  • Stage 4 Poll and document new member-scores
  • Stage 5 Present the proposal-scores and vote
    the top-two proposals.
  • Stage 6 Select the winning-proposal.
  • Stage 7 Finalize the technology selection
    process.
  • At any TSP stage, the working group may decide
    (by simple majority) to abort it and cycle back
    to the previous stage.

24
Summary
  • This TSP proposal is designed to assure a
    balanced and fair selection process
  • Additional work is needed to bring this proposal
    to an agreed upon, complete TSP state (see TBD
    indications and the five annexes of contribution
    C802.20-04-72)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com