Gee Macrory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Gee Macrory

Description:

Learning teaching methods from others and sharing experience ... Differential training needs for different community languages. Training trainers: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: MMUU2
Category:
Tags: gee | macrory | sharing

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gee Macrory


1
Promoting diversity in language learning the
role of teacher education
  • Gee Macrory
  • Institute of Education
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • 19 November 2009

2
COLT teacher training 2007- 10
  • Gee Macrory g.macrory_at_mmu.ac.uk
  • Pura Ariza p.ariza_at_mmu.ac.uk

3
Outline
  • Role of teacher education
  • Training the trainers
  • Course structure and content for teachers
  • Supplementary school teachers
  • Initial teacher education
  • Training the trainers
  • Findings
  • Conclusions
  • Issues to consider

4
Role of teacher education
  • Teacher education opportunity or barrier?
  • Place of community languages and MFL
  • Who educates the teachers?
  • From classroom to higher education (Wright, 2008)
  • Appropriate knowledge base (Fedick, 2005)
  • Training the trainers

5
Training the trainers
  • Appointment of trainers for Mandarin, Urdu and
    Arabic
  • Identification of teacher audience (course
    participants)
  • Teachers from complementary schools (yrs 1,2,3)
  • Trainees in initial teacher education (yrs 2,3)
  • Basic course structure and workshop content for
    teachers

6
Course structure for teachers
  • Needs of participants (see Minty et al, 2008)
  • Teachers in complementary schools
  • Trainees in initial teacher education

7
Teachers in complementary schools
  • Course structure 4 parts
  • Workshop 1 at university
  • Visit to a mainstream school
  • Workshop 2 at university
  • Visit by trainer to teaching context (observation
    and feedback opportunity)

8
Initial teacher trainees
  • 4 part course structure
  • Workshop 1 at university
  • Visit to a complementary school
  • Workshop 2 at university
  • Visit by trainer to teaching context (observation
    and feedback opportunity)

9
University workshops
  • Workshop 1
  • Characteristics of a good teacher
  • Language analysis characteristics learner
    perspectives
  • Role of target language
  • Teaching activities (skills, grammar)
  • Planning a school visit
  • Workshop 2
  • Debrief from school visit
  • Planning and assessment
  • Place of culture
  • Preparation for a visit from trainer

10
Follow up day for all
  • Planning
  • Assessment
  • Professional progress
  • Future needs

11
Attendees
  • Complementary school44 teachers on the autumn
    2008 course and 28 on the spring 2009 course41
    currently on autumn 09 course
  • ITE 15
  • 38 people attended the top-up workshop.

12
Certification and accreditation
  • Certificate of attendance for 4 part course
  • Accreditation at 20 CAT points against award

13
How did we train the trainers?
  • Two full day workshops (June 2008) prior to 4
    part course
  • Review and development meeting (Jan 09)
  • Additional days training (April 09)prior to
    follow up day in June 09
  • Two further training day for trainers (Oct 09
    March 2010)
  • Content and process

14
Content
  • A parallel process
  • Needs analysis
  • The good teacher trainer
  • Anticipating participant needs
  • Subject knowledge for teaching
  • Methodological issues
  • Assessment
  • Planning a training session
  • Preparing teachers to observe
  • Observing and giving feedback
  • Accreditation

15
Process principles and pragmatism
  • Some guiding principles (see Wright Bolitho,
    2007)
  • Modelling a teacher education pedagogy
  • Making choices about content
  • A training plan as an outcome

16
What was the impact on teachers and trainers?
  • Teachers (complementary ITE trainees)
  • Trainers

17
Findings teachers from complementary schools
  • Year 1

18
Findings teachers from complementary schools
  • Year 2

19
Follow up day
20
What was useful?
  • Learning teaching methods from others and sharing
    experience
  • Active discussions and plenty of useful and
    practical information
  • Opportunity to observe teaching in local schools
  • Very clear and enthusiastic delivery
  • Classroom management skills gained
  • Feedback on observations
  • Guidance of where to obtain help and resources
  • Information about asset languages and the
    language ladder as a way to encourage pupils
  • Teaching through action to engage pupils
  • Ideas for integrating games and activities into
    the classroom
  • Techniques for teaching grammar

21
ITE trainees
  •  
  • 83 of the trainees reported to be very satisfied
    with the overall workshop, the material,
    delivery, relevance and opportunities for
    discussion with colleagues.
  • Techniques found most useful
  • Learning where to find resources and how to use
    them
  • Practical tips to keep students engaged
  • How to include culture points into lesson plan
  • Techniques to encourage use of target language in
    the classroom and in other subjects such as maths
  • 67 of the trainees declared that the school
    visit has been extremely useful as it enabled
    them to see how languages are taught outside the
    mainstream school

22
Feedback from trainers
  • Useful and appropriate content
  • Discussion valued
  • Opportunity to develop training skills and to
    train colleagues as colleagues rather than
    students
  • Improved professional practice
  • Made me more reflective and focused as a trainer
  • An effective model of training

23
Conclusions
  • Enriching opportunity for all
  • First training opportunity for many
  • Opportunities to observe in other contexts valued
  • Clear desire to make further progress
  • High interest in gaining QTS

24
Some issues to consider
  • Course structure and content
  • Meeting QTS needs of teachers from complementary
    schools
  • Developing the profile of community languages in
    teacher education, initial and CPD
  • Longer-term impact of training
  • Differential training needs for different
    community languages
  • Training trainers modelling practice or
    co-operative development?
  • Synergy and sustainability

25
References
  • Minty, S., Maylor, U., Tözün, I., Kuyok, K. and
    Ross, A. (2008) Our Languages Teachers in
    supplementary schools and their aspirations to
    teach community languages. Institute for Policy
    Studies in Education, London Metropolitan
    University.
  • Naldic (2009) Developing a bilingual pedagogy for
    UK schools. Naldic Working Paper No.9
  • Partnerships in Language and Culture A toolkit
    for complementary and mainstream schools working
    in collaboration. www.ourlanguages.org.uk
  • Tedick, D.J. (2005) Second language teacher
    education international perspectives. Mahwah,
    N.J Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wright, T. and Bolitho, R. (2008) Trainer
    Development. www.lulu.com
  • Wright, T. (2008) Trainer development
    Professional Development for Language Teacher
    Education. In Burns, A. and J. Richards (eds)
    The Cambridge Guide to Language Teacher
    Education. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com