Title: Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs
1Ins and Outs of Indirect Costs
CAPLAW National Training Conference
Presented by Carr, Riggs Ingram, LLC William H.
Carr, CPA J. Michael Maddox, CPA,
CFE www.cricpa.com
2AGENDA
- Welcome and Introductions
- What is Indirect Cost
- Types of Rates
- Selecting the appropriate base
- Preparing IDC Proposal
- Common Pitfalls
- Barriers to Full Recovery
- FAQs
- Questions
3 4- Applicable Standards
- OMB Circular A-122
- Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations
- OMB Circular A-110
- Uniform Administrative Requirements
- OMB Circular A-133
- Audits of States, Local Governments and
Non-Profit Organizations
5- Two types of costs
- Direct Costs
- Costs that can be identified specifically with a
particular project relatively easily and with a
high degree of accuracy - Indirect Costs
- Costs that are incurred for common or joint
objectives - a.k.a. Facilities and Administrative Costs
Both can be programmatic or administrative
6Characteristics of Two Types of Costs
- Direct Costs
- Easily identified to a cost objective
- Head Start teacher salaries
- LIHEAP client benefits
- CACFP Food Costs
- Typically benefit one program
- Can be charged directly to applicable cost
objective - Indirect Costs
- Not easily identified to a particular cost
objective - Fiscal officer salaries
- Cost of IT systems
- Facilities costs
- Typically benefit more than one program
- Must be allocated to various benefiting programs
7(No Transcript)
8Direct Costs
Indirect Costs
9- Challenge becomes
- How do we equitably recover our indirect costs?
10(No Transcript)
11- OMB Circular A-122 Cost Principles for
Non-Profit Organizations - Requires equitable allocation to benefiting cost
objectives - Sets forth two methods to allocate indirect cost
- Simplified allocation method
- Used when major functions benefit to
approximately same degree - Utilizes single rate
- Multiple allocation base method
- Used when major functions benefit in varying
degrees - Utilizes multiple pools and rates
- Utilizes multiple bases
- Square footage for space
- Modified Total Direct Cost for GA
12- Direct Allocation Method as option to indirect
cost allocation - Treats all costs as Direct Costs except GA and
general expenses - Joint Costs (depreciation, rental costs,
telephone expense, facilities, etc.) - Prorated individually as direct costs using most
appropriate base - Acceptable method as long as base
- Accurately measures benefits provided to each
award/activity - Are established in accordance with reasonable
criteria - Are supported by current data
13Recovery of Indirect Cost
- Negotiate IDC Rate(s)
- Identify Indirect Costs
- Accumulate in IDC Pool(s)
- Allocate to Programs via approved Indirect Cost
Rate
14Steps to Negotiating Your Rate
- Determine type of Rate desired
- Determine most appropriate base
- Prepare and Submit IDC Proposal
- Negotiate Rate with Cognizant Agency
- Formalized written agreement
15Types of Indirect Cost Rates
- Provisional Rate
- Temporary Rate
- Established for a prospective period of time
- Based on estimated costs
- Later revised to Final Rate based on operating
experience - Final Rate
- Established after actual costs for period are
known - Replaces Provisional Rate
- Based on audited financial statements
16Types of Indirect Cost Rates (cont.)
- Predetermined Rate
- Effective for a specified period of time (i.e.
fiscal year) - Based on estimate of costs to be incurred during
the period - Not subject to adjustment
- Fixed Rate
- Same characteristics as Predetermined Rate
- Subject to prospective adjustment
- Actual vs. Estimated costs carried forward as
adjustment to rate of subsequent period
17Types of Indirect Cost Rates (cont.)
- Special Rate
- Developed to deal with unique situations
- Often used by colleges/universities when IDCs are
different for on-campus and off-campus activities - Multiple Indirect Cost Rates
- Utilized where organization-wide rate not
appropriate - Consider when departments, divisions or programs
use services of IDC pool disproportionately
18Step Two
- Determining
- Appropriate
- Base
19- Typical IDC Bases
- Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC)
- Excludes Capital Expenditures, flow through funds
and subcontracts - Direct Salaries and Wages
- Direct Salaries and Wages, including fringe
benefits
20Sample Rate Calculation
- Total IDC Pool - 500,000
- Total Direct Cost - 5,000,000
- Resulting IDC Rate 10
- (500,000/5,000,000)
- Total Salaries and Wages - 2,000,000
- Resulting IDC Rate 25
- (500,000/2,000,000)
21Factors Affecting Base Selection
- Types of Direct Costs Incurred
- Are some programs more labor intensive than
others? - Do some programs benefit from pooled costs
disproportionately to their direct costs? - Restrictions on Admin/IDC Costs within Grants
- Some programs are more restrictive
- Over-Arching Principle
- Base utilized must result in equitable allocation
with respect to benefits derived
22Steps to Determining Your Rate
- Determine type of Rate desired
- Determine most appropriate base
- Prepare and Submit IDC Proposal
- Negotiate Rate with Cognizant Agency
- Formalized written agreement
23Elements of Indirect Cost Proposal
- Narrative
- Introduction describing entity, types of programs
and period covered - Cost allocation methodology
- How agency identifies direct vs. indirect costs
- Nature of proposal (seeking indirect rate,
multiple rates, special rate, etc.) - Definition of Direct and Indirect costs and how
captured - Description of cost pool and base for
distribution - Reconciliation to audited financial statements
- List of Salaries by position and Fringe costs
included in indirect pool - Salaries listed must identify percentage charged
to pool if not 100
24Elements of Indirect Cost Proposal
- Schedule of Total Direct Cost
- Subtotal for labor costs
- Columnar format broken down by programs
- Schedule of Indirect Cost Pool
- Can include with Direct Cost in Schedule of
Functional Expenditures - Exclude unallowable costs
- Exclude capital expenditures
- Include depreciation and use allowance on
indirect portion of faciliites - Calculation of Proposed Rate
- Indirect Costs divided by Applicable Base
- Lobbying Cost Certificate
- Certifies compliance with OMB A-122 re lobbying
costs - IDC Proposal Checklist
http//rates.psc.gov/fms/dca/np_exall.pdf
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27- Your proposal is just that.a Proposal
- Must be negotiated with your cognizant agency
- Cognizant Agency
- Typically largest funding source
- HHS Division of Cost Allocation (DCA)
- Role is to maximize cost savings
- Cost Savings defined as negotiating plan or rate
that is less than proposal - Cost Savings for FYE 6/30/03
- Total 717,637,000 (2,044 plans)
- Includes over 73,000,000 in cash refunds
- NPOs 47,303,000 (1,012 plans)
- 46,700 per NPO plan
Source http//www.ncura.edu/data/conferences/45/
handouts/CognizantAgencies_Talesnik.pdf
28Negotiation Process
- Cognizant Agency Review and Negotiation
- Review for required documentation
- Review prior negotiation work papers
- Reconcile proposal to financial statements
- Review proposed base for equitable distribution
- Perform trend analysis
- Review costs for allowability, consistency and
treatment of costs - Concluding steps and rate negotiations
Source DCA Review Guide for NPO Indirect Cost
Proposals
29- Review for Required Documentation
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking for
- Proposal itself
- Audited financial statement
- For period of proposal
- Reconciliation between Proposal and Audited
Financials - Notice of Grant Award or Financial Assistance
Award Document - Evidence that NPO has current award that is
eligible to receive IDC - Information specifically requested by CA in prior
correspondence or advance agreements established
in previous negotiations
30- RECONCILIATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking for
- Incorporation of prior corrections or adjustments
into current proposal - Existence of Special Rates
- For period of proposal
- Did prior agreement contain conditions and did
NPO comply? - Proper Carryforward in Fixed Rate Agreements
- Over-recovery in prior year will reduce rate in
current year - Need for site visit
- Usually associated with multiple rates
- Perform math check
31- REVIEW PRIOR NEGOTIATED WORK PAPERS
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
- Reconcile total of Direct and Indirect Costs to
expenses reflected in financial statements - Analyze adjustments for unallowable and
extraneous costs that should be excluded - Analyze and verify accuracy and necessity for
adjustments and reclassifications - Adjustments may include known changes in
circumstances for upcoming periods
32- REVIEW FOR ACCEPTABLE BASE
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
- Determine that proposed base results in most
equitable distribution of indirect costs - Verify that base is consistent with base used in
previous submissions and rates - i.e. Use of Total Direct Salaries and Fringe in
past and exclusion of fringe in current proposal - Base change can be negotiated must prove to be
more equitable
33- TREND ANALYSIS
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will perform detailed trend
analysis of indirect costs, rates and allocation
base for last three years, including proposal
year - Be prepared to explain unusual increases in
indirect cost in comparison to increase in Base - i.e. Base increases 5 and indirect travel
increases 40. - Reviewer will want substantiation of increase in
indirect travel
34- ALLOWABILITY, CONSISTENCY AND TREATMENT OF COSTS
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will be looking to
- Determine whether proposed costs benefit federal
awardsa - Determine that types of costs in IDC pool are
consistently treated as indirect costs - Review proposal and financial statements for
unallowable costs - Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
- Financial Statement Disclosures
- Alcoholic beverages, bad debts, contingencies,
contributions and donations, fines and penalties,
fund raising, lobbying, etc. - Review financial statements for any applicable
offsets - Income generated by activites in indirect cost
pool - i.e. Rents generated from facilities costs
charged to pool
35- CONCLUDING STEPS AND RATE NEGOTIATIONS
- Cognizant Agency (CA) will
- Look for anticipated significant changes in level
of NPOs activities - Rates typically based on most recent years
actual costs - Adjustments may be made for anticipated changes
- Determine whether advance agreements should be
established - May be needed to preclude future
disputes/problems - May be related to changes/refinements in base
- May be in reference to agreed upon treatment of
certain types of costs - Negotiate appropriate type of rate
- Provisional negotiator has little confidence in
consistency of costs, organization has plans for
significant operational changes, accuracy of
rates contingent on occurrence of future events - Predetermined only if high probability that
recovery will approximate proposed costs - Fixed May be used unless unlikely to have
future awards, erratic mix of federal vs.
non-federal funds from year to year, operating
activities unstable, etc.
36- Understanding How Pools Function and Potential
Pitfalls
37Pitfalls
- Predetermined Rate
- Cant loseright?
- What if indirect Costs Pool grows faster than
base? - Base Year Base 1,000,000
- Pool 100,000
- Rate 10
- Year 1 Base 1,100,000
- Pool 105,000
- Recover - 110,000 (5,000 excess)
- Year 2 Base 1,250,000
- Pool 150,000
- Recover 125,000 (25,000 unrecovered IDC)
- Management of Indirect Budget in proportion to
Budgeted Base is critical with this type of
rate
38Pitfalls
- Provisional/Final Rate
- Base grows faster than pool costs
- Base Year Base 1,000,000
- Pool 100,000
- Rate 10
- Year 1 Base 1,100,000
- Pool 105,000
- Final Rate 9.55
- Recovered - 110,000
- 5,000 excess (must be repaid)
-
- Management of Base Costs in proportion to
Budgeted Pool is critical with this type of rate - Rememberthis type of rate is subject to
adjustment
39Pitfalls
- Fixed Rate with carryforward
- Base grows faster than pool costs
- Base Year Base 1,000,000
- Pool 100,000
- Rate 10
- Year 1 Base 1,100,000
- Pool 105,000
- Recovered - 110,000
- 5,000 excess
- Year 2 Rate Computation
- Year 1 Actual excess/Year 1 base
- New Rate (105-5/1100) 9.091
-
- Year 2 Base 1,100,000
- Pool 105,000
- Recovered - 100,000
- 5,000 unrecovered cost
40- Other Barriers to Full IDC Recovery
41- Other Barriers/Pittfalls
- Failure to Properly Identify Indirect Costs
- Charged as direct charges to non-federal programs
- Misclassified on general ledger as unallowable
type of cost - Failure to include Depreciation/Use allowance for
indirect facilities costs - Administrative/IDC limits on Specific Grants
- Certain grants/programs limit Admin costs to 10
- 15 - Certain grants/programs allow no indirect costs
- Costs allocable to these programs must be
absorbed by non-federal funds - Cannot be used as match without prior approval
(OMB A-110 sub-part B, section 23(b))
42Helpful Hints
- INDIRECT vs. ADMINSTRATIVE
- Indirect does not necessarily mean administrative
- Example Facilities Cost
- Remote office housing intake staff for three
grants - Common space is programmatic in nature but may
not be directly allocable - Example Exec. Director Salaries
- May have programmatic and administrative duties
43- EXAMPLE
- Assumptions
- Grant of 600,000
- Admin Limit 10
- Indirect Costs to be charged to grant total
65,000 -
- Did we exceed admin limit????
44- Pool of Indirect Costs
- Accounting System Admin
- Travel Admin
- Director Salary Prog/Admin
- Facilities Prog/Admin
- Supplies Admin
- Telephone Admin
- Assume this calculates to 65 Admin and 35
program
45- Resulting Calculations
- Total IDC 65,000 65 admin portion 42,250
administrative IDC - Admin Limit 60,000
- Leaves room for 17,750 Direct Admin Costs
- Important to understand the true nature of costs
within IDC Pool
46Common Indirect Cost Problems
- Timekeeping Systems
- To be allowable, labor costs, whether direct or
indirect must be based on accurate time sheets
reflecting actual activities of all employees.
47Common Indirect Cost Problems
- Cost of Unallowable Activities
- Must not be charged to indirect cost pool
- Must be treated as direct costs (charged to
separate final cost objectives) and allocated an
equitable portion of indirect cost. (OMB A-122,
Attachment A, paragraphs B.3 and B.4)
48Common Indirect Cost Problems
- Credits
- Failure to reduce total costs incurred (both
direct costs of a specific program or indirect
costs) by credits applicable to those costs. - Fees for conferences
- Building rental programs
- Insurance credits or adustments
- Data processing and office services performed for
others
49Common Indirect Cost Problems
- Inter-Organizational Transfers and Related-Party
Transactions - Supplies and services acquired from affiliates,
related parties and organizations under common
control must be based on the supplying
organizations actual costs - Cannot include profit
- Applies to rental of buildings owned by related
parties
50Common Indirect Cost Problems
- Unsupported Costs
- To be allowable, all direct and indirect costs
must be adequately supported by source
documentation - Cancelled checks and credit card receipts not
sufficient - Must meet purpose and circumstance test
51FAQs
- What do we do if some grants/contracts provide
for no indirect costs or rates lower than our
approved indirect rate? - All indirect costs must be allocated using the
approved indirect rate. Any allocated cost that
exceeds approved rates or ceiling under a
specific project may not be shifted to other
Federal grants/contracts, unless specifically
authorized by legislation. Non-federal sources
must be used to pay for these un-recovered costs.
52FAQs
- Can our indirect cost rate be based on Federal
funds only since they only represent 15 of our
total revenue? - No. Your indirect cost rate proposal must be
accompanied by a schedule of costs incurred for
all projects, Federal and non-Federal, and the
amount of the proposed allocation base must
tie-in with the applicable direct cost base for
all projects.
53FAQs
- What is the difference between bid and proposal
costs and fund raising costs and how should
they be treated in our indirect cost proposal - Bid and proposal costs represent salaries,
consultant fees, printing, postage, travel etc.
associated with proposals and applications to
perform specific tasks for renumeration under
Federal and non-federal grants/contracts. Treat
as allowable indirect costs subject to any
limitations imposed by cognizant agency. - Fund raising costs represent these types of costs
associated with seeking donation of funds for
non-specific purposes from private institutions
or individuals. Unallowable for Federal
reimbursement purposes. Must be included in
direct costs and allocated an appropriate share
of indirect.
54FAQs
- Can audit costs under OMB Circular A-133 be
recovered? - A-133 allows audit costs to be recovered as
either direct or indirect costs in accordance
with applicable cost principles. However, there
is no specific appropriation for audit costs.
Must be built into specific grant/contract
document (if direct) or into the indirect cost
proposal (if indirect).
55FAQs
- What is the relationship of OMB A-122, Cost
Principles for Non-Profit Organizations and OMB
Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
Governmentes and Non-Profit Organizations in
regard to indirect costs? - The compliance supplement for OMB Circular A-133
incorporates OMB Circular A-122 and requires the
auditor to audit direct and indirect costs to
determine whether costs claimed are in compliance
with OMB Circular A-122.
56FAQs
- Can transactions with an affiliate affect
allowable costs - Yes. The cost of goods and services delivered
from an affiliate must exclude any profit
component. (OMB Circular A-122) - This works in reverse also. If the non-profit
provides goods or services to an affiliate, a
credit must be applied to the appropriate cost
center, whether direct or indirect.
FAQs obtained from www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/
costdeterminationguide/sec4/htm
57FAQs
- Is the cost of accrued annual leave allowable
under OMB Circular A-122? - In most instances, yes.
- Under A-122, cost charged to grants/contracts
must be determined in accordance with GAAP. (OMB
Circular A-122, Attachment A, Part A., paragraph
2.e. - GAAP requires recording of accrued leave if
- Employers obligation relating to employees
rights to receive compensation for future
absences is attributable to employees services
already rendered - The obligation relates to rights that vest or
accumulate - Payment of the compensation is probable
- The amount can be reasonably estimated
- Does not result in increased costs, but allows
for recognition of costs in the proper accounting
period
FAQs obtained from www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/
costdeterminationguide/sec4/htm
58OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for
Non-Profit Organizations, http//www.whitehouse.
gov/omb/circulars/a122/a122.html
OMB Circular A-110, Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and
Other Non-Profit Organizations http//www.whiteh
ouse.gov/omb/circulars/a110/a110.html
OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local
Governments and Non-Profit Organizations http/
/www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a133/a133.html
HHS Division of Cost Allocation http//rates.psc.
gov/
59QUESTIONS???