Title: Information Asset Classification Communications Forum
1Information Asset ClassificationCommunications
Forum
- Theresa A. Masse, State Chief Information
Security Officer - Department of Administrative ServicesEnterprise
Security Office
2Agenda
- Policy Overview
- Community of Practice Update
- Enterprise Information
- Agency Plan
- Methodology and Agency Plan
- Clearinghouse and QA
- Wrap up
3Policy - Overview
- Information will be classified and managed based
on its confidentiality, sensitivity, value and
availability requirements. - Identify an Information Owner or Owners
- Owner responsible for
- Initial Classification
- Decisions regarding information management
- Review and reclassification if appropriate
- Proper retention and disposal
- Statewide information
- Agency information
4Policy Classification Levels
- Level 1, Published - Low-sensitive information,
will not jeopardize the privacy or security of
agency employees, clients and partners. - Examples Press releases, brochures, pamphlets,
public access Web pages, and materials created
for public consumption. - Level 2, Limited - Sensitive information, may
jeopardize the privacy or security of agency
employees, clients, partners. - Examples Enterprise risk management planning
documents, published internal audit reports,
names and addresses that are not protected from
disclosure.
5Policy Classification Levels
- Level 3, Restricted Sensitive information ,
unauthorized access could result in financial
loss or identity theft. - Examples Network diagrams, personally
identifiable information, other information
exempt from public records disclosure. - Level 4, Critical - Extremely sensitive,
potential to cause major damage or injury. - Examples Disclosure that could result in loss
of life, disability or serious injury or
regulated information with significant penalties
for unauthorized disclosure, information that is
typically exempt from public disclosure.
6Policy - Compliance Time Line
- Plan developed by June 30, 2009
- Level 4 identified and protected by December 31,
2009 - All other policy provisions completed by June
30, 2010 - Note Agencies are required to comply with the
Oregon Consumer Identity Theft Protection Act
(Senate Bill 583, 2007 Legislative Session)
7Community of Practiceand DHS Approach
- Kyle Miller
- Department of Human Services
8Community of Practice
- Membership Representatives
- Human Services
- Consumer and Business Services
- Forestry
- Corrections
- Transportation
- Education
- Administrative Services
9Community of Practice
- Goals
- Methodology document that contains best practices
and links to tools and resources - Best practices for classification
- Elements of information asset management
- Recommendations for user awareness
- Recommendations regarding policy
10DHS Approach
- Survey approach
- Information exchange
- Forms development
- Other Initiatives
11Enterprise Information
- Bret West
- Department of Administrative Services
12Enterprise Information
- What enterprise information does DAS own?
- HR
- Payroll
- Financial
- Contracts
- DAS-Owned Facilities
- State Network
- Others
13Enterprise Information
- What does ownership mean?
- DAS is responsible for determining classification
levels - DAS is responsible for communicating
classification levels to stakeholders - Ownership rests with DAS until information is
transferred to another agency - At that point, agencies will be responsible for
ensuring security
14Enterprise Information
- What does ownership mean?
- Business partners (in this case DAS divisions)
are responsible for classifying information
assets - This is not a technology issue!
15Enterprise Information
- Example Statewide Financial Management
Application Data - The application itself will be classified at
Level 4 - Combination of data elements puts the state and
individuals at risk - Specific elements or reports will be classified
according to the statewide policy guidelines
16Enterprise Information
- Example Statewide Financial Management
Application Data (continued) - Specific elements or reports will be classified
according to the statewide policy guidelines - Currently, SFMS staff have labeled reports
confidential or not confidential based on
data included - Further work will be done to classify these
reports according to appropriate levels
17Enterprise Information
- When will the classifications be available?
- Our goal is to have all Level 4 data classified
by July 1, 2008 - Our draft internal policy requires all Level 3
data to be classified by January 1, 2009 and all
Level 2 data classified by July 1, 2009.
18ODOTS SECURITY FABRICAddressing Information
Security
- Lisa Martinez
- Oregon Department of Transportation
19Where do you begin?
- Establish a First-Strike project team to
develop your initial roll out strategy - Make sure you have the right blend of business
and information technology representatives - Review and consolidate standards across all of
the DAS Enterprise Information Security policies
and Senate Bill 583 - Develop a final draft of an agency-wide
assessment tool to determine where your agency is
in meeting, partially meeting, or not meeting the
consolidated standards - Pilot tool in a few areas to gather information
on resources and time required to assess across
your agency
20Where do you begin? (cont.)
- Make sure you have the support and commitment of
your agency Director and his/her direct reports - Provide enough information so they understand the
work effort required by their managers and
employees - Have them provide names of appropriate staff to
assist on a project team - Make sure that you use them to reinforce agency
commitment if you encounter problems
21Where do you begin? (cont.)
- Take time to understand how other initiatives
underway in your agency interlace with
Information Security - Can you demonstrate benefit to other initiatives
with regard to information gathering, business
process mapping, and similar tasks - Be willing to share information with other
project teams - Dont overlook everyday work processes they may
be an easy opportunity to help with culture change
22Where do you begin? (cont.)
- Communicate to managers and employees why this
initiative is important - Make it real by giving real life examples
- Utilize internal communication tools such as
newsletters, intranet pages, etc. - Acknowledge that this will take time and is not
an overnight process - Consider an Information Security hotline
- Identify Available Resources
23ODOT Progress Report
- First Strike Project Team established
consisting of business and information technology
staff and contracted project manager - Identified standards across policies and SB 583
- Developing assessment tool, criteria to measure
current state against standards, glossary of
terms and background materials - Identified two business areas to pilot tool
- Preparing presentation for Director and his
direct reports to affirm support and commitment
and solicit business resources
24Identified Key Business Challenges and
Opportunities
Reduce Agency Risk Potential to Improve Business
Processes Recognize and Develop
Partnerships Develop and Share Best
Practices Successful Implementation Results in
Improved Agency Compliance
Reliant on Business Line Subject Matter
Experts Competes with Other Priorities Undefined
Roles and Responsibilities Requires Routine
Review and Assessment to Manage Risk
Identify Business Contacts for Each Division,
Region, and Branch
25Gather Requirements and Identify Gaps
Subject Matter Experts from Lines of Business
- Project Team
- Review Results
- Rank Gaps Based on Risks and Priorities
- Develop Blueprint of Implementation Plan
High Opportunity
High Risk
Low Opportunity
Low Risk
26Available Resources
- Statewide Community of Practice (CoP) Workgroup
on Information Assets Management Policy - Tool development
- Information asset classification architecture
methodology - Risk assessment tools
- Communication tools
- Will continue sharing process documents
- Web site resource
- ODOT IS Tech Management Research
- Inventory and identify capabilities of current
information security tools - Research capabilities of other security tools,
for example data leakage - Business Line Best Practices
27Information Asset Classification
- John Koreski
- Department of Corrections
28Methodology
- Information Asset Classification Methodology
- Identify information assets
- Identify the owner
- Conduct an impact assessment
- Determine the classification
- Document classified information assets
- Provide education and awareness
- Maintain classification and conduct continuous
review
29Security
- Organization Security
- Legal Implications
30Recommended Strategy to Implement the Office of
Legal Affairs
- Phase 1
- Identify LIO and PIOs 1/08
- Create Training
- Deliver Training 3/08
- DOJ/DOC key staff
- Management
- Other impacted staff
- Create Tracking Mechanisms
- Establish Measures
- Complete Phase 1 12/08
12 mos.
31Recommended Strategy to Implement the Office of
Legal Affairs
- Phase 2
- Info. Asset Identification 4/08
- Project Mgmt. Methodology
- Archive E-Mail Project
- Transporting Info. Assets Project
- Complete Phase 2 6/09
15 mos.
32Recommended Strategy to Implement the Office of
Legal Affairs
- Phase 3
- Begin Grant Admin. Strategy 7/09
- Hire Info. Security Officer (ISO)
- See handout for duties
- Hire Records Officer (RO)
- See handout for duties
- Complete Phase 3 1/11
18 mos.
33Recommended Strategy to Implement the Office of
Legal Affairs
- Phase 4
- Electronic Records Management
- Enterprise Content Management
- Timeline approximately 1/11 7/11
34Clearinghouse and Wrap Up
- Theresa A. Masse, State Chief Information
Security Officer - Department of Administrative ServicesEnterprise
Security Office
35Policy Resources
- A clearinghouse-type Web site with links to best
practices and tools/templates - www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/ESO/IAC.shtml
36Thank You
- Other Questions
- Contact
- Eva.Doud_at_state.or.us 503-378-3071
- Cinnamon.S.Albin_at_state.or.us 503-373-1496