Logic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Logic

Description:

'Roses are red' 'Republicans are Conservatives' 'P' Operators ... 'Roses are Red and Violets are blue.' 'Republicans are conservative and Democrats are liberal. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: polsc
Category:
Tags: logic | red | roses

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Logic


1
Logic
A short primer on Deduction and Inference
We will look at Symbolic Logic in order to
examine how we employ deduction in cognition.
2
Logic
A short primer on Deduction and Inference
We need to try to avoid skewed logic.
3
Logic
What is Logic?
  • Logic
  • The study by which arguments are classified into
    good ones and bad ones.

4
Logical Systems
  • There are actually many logical systems
  • The one we will examine in class is called RS1 (I
    think)
  • It is comprised of
  • Statements
  • "Roses are red
  • "Republicans are Conservatives
  • P
  • Operators
  • And
  • Or
  • not
  • Some Rules of Inference

5
Logic
Compound Statements
  • Conjunctions (Conjunction Junction)
  • Two simple statements may be connected with a
    conjunction
  • The conjunction and
  • The disjunction or

6
The conjunction operator
  • and
  • Symbolized by
  • "Roses are Red and Violets are blue.
  • "Republicans are conservative and Democrats are
    liberal.
  • P Q (P and Q)

7
The disjunction operator
  • or
  • Symbolized by v
  • "Republicans are conservative or Republicans are
    moderate
  • P v Q

8
Negation
  • Not
  • Symbolized by
  • That is not a rose
  • Bob is not a Republican
  • A

9
Operators
  • These may be used to symbolize complex statements
  • The other symbol of value is
  • Equivalence (?)
  • This is not quite the same as equal to.

10
Truth Tables
  • Statements have truth value
  • For example, take the statement PQ
  • This statement is true only if P and Q are both
    true.
  • P Q PQ
  • T T T
  • T F F
  • F T F
  • F F F

11
Truth Tables (cont)
  • Hence Republicans are conservative and Democrats
    are liberal. is true only if both parts are
    true.
  • On the other hand, take the statement PvQ
  • This statement is true only if either P or Q are
    true, but not both. (Called the exclusive or)
  • P Q PvQ
  • T T F
  • T F T
  • F T T
  • F F F

12
The Inclusive or
  • Note that or can be interpreted differently.
  • Both parts of the disjunction may be true in the
    inclusive or. This statement is true if either
    or both P or Q are true.
  • P Q PvQ
  • T T T
  • T F T
  • F T T
  • F F F

13
The Exclusive or
  • With the exclusive or, of p is true, than q
    cannot be.
  • Only one part of the disjunction may be true in
    the exclusive or. This statement is true if
    either P is true or Q is true, but not both.
  • P Q PvQ
  • T T F
  • T F T
  • F T T
  • F F F

14
The Conditional
  • The Conditional
  • if a (antecedent)
  • then b (consequent)
  • It is also called the hypothetical, or
    implication.
  • This translates to
  • A implies B
  • If A then B
  • A causes B
  • Symbolized by A ? B

15
The Implication
  • We use the conditional or implication a great
    deal.
  • It is the core statement of the scientific law,
    and hence the hypothesis.

16
Equivalency of the Implication
  • Note that the Implication is actually equivalent
    to a compound statement of the simpler operators.
  • p v q
  • Please note that the implication has a broader
    interpretation than common English would suggest

17
Rules of Inference
  • In order to use these logical components, we have
    constructed rules of Inference
  • These rules are essentially how we think.

18
Modus Ponens
  • This is the classic rule of inference for
    scientific explanation.

19
Modus Tollens
  • This reflects the idea of rejecting the theory
    when the consequent is not observed as expected.

20
Disjunctive Syllogism
21
Hypothetical Syllogism
  • Classic reasoning
  • All men are mortal.
  • Socrates is a man.
  • Therefore Socrates is mortal.

22
Logical Systems
  • Logic gives us power in our reasoning when we
    build complex sets of interrelated statements.
  • When we can apply the rules of inference to these
    statements to derive new propositions, we have a
    more powerful theory.

23
Tautologies
  • Note that p v p must be true
  • Roses are red or roses are not red. must be
    true.
  • A statement which must be true is called a
    tautology.
  • A set of statements which, if taken together,
    must be true is also called a tautology (or
    tautologous).
  • Note that this is not a criticism.

24
Tautologous systems
  • Systems in which all propositions are by
    definition true, are tautologous.
  • Balance of Power
  • Why do wars occur? Because there is a change in
    the balance of power.
  • How do you know that power is out of balance? A
    war will occur.
  • Note that this is what we typically call circular
    reasoning.
  • The problem isnt the circularity, it is the lack
    of utility.

25
Useful Tautologies
  • Can a logical system in which all propositions
    formulated within be true have any utility?
  • Try Geometry
  • Calculus
  • Classical Mechanics
  • But not arithmetic
  • Kurt Gödel his Incompleteness Theorem

26
  • The Liars Paradox
  • Epimenedes the Cretan says that all Cretans are
    liars.
  • The Paper Paradox (a variant of the Liars
    paradox)
  • lt The next statement is true.
  • lt The previous statement is false.
  • For further info
  • Russells Paradox
  • The paradox arises within naive set theory by
    considering the set of all sets that are not
    members of themselves.
  • Such a set appears to be a member of itself if
    and only if it is not a member of itself.
  • Hence the paradox

27
Grellings Paradox
  • Homological a word which describes itself
  • Short is a short word
  • English is an English word
  • Heterological a word which does not describe
    itself
  • German is not a German words
  • Long is not a long word
  • Is heterological heterological?

28
Paradox of voting
  • It is possible for voting preferences to result
    in elections in which a less preferred candidate
    wins over a preferred one.
  • See Paradox of Voting
  • Suppose you have 3 individuals and candidates A,
    B and C
  • Individual 1 A gt B gt C
  • Individual 2 C gt A gt B
  • Individual 3 B gt C gt A
  • Now if these individuals were asked to make a
    group choice (majority vote) between A and B,
    they would chose A
  • If asked to make a group choice between B and C,
    they would chose B.
  • If asked to make a group choice between C and A,
    they would chose C.
  • So for the group A is preferred to B, B is
    preferred to C, but C is preferred to A! This is
    not transitive which certainly goes against what
    we would logically expect.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com