Title: Vocational Education Since 1900
1Vocational Education Since 1900
2The Need
- The public was disenchanted with the school
system in the early 1900s. - Schools were out-of-touch with the realities of
the real world - There was a need for a different type of
education
3Another Need
- Farmers needed systematic help to fight their
problems (such as the boll weevil) - The once a year Farmers Institute was not enough
- The competing programs offered by state boards of
agriculture, the General Education Board,
universities and agricultural societies was
merely a hodge podge of activity - Simply put, there was a need for something like
the Extension Service.
4First stirrings.extension
- Farm Demonstration Work in the South to fight the
boll weevil and the subsequent hiring of county
agents by the General Education Board was the
start of extension.
5Early Efforts to Organize Support
- Governor Douglas of Massachusetts appointed a
commission to study schools in that state. - In 1906 the Douglas Commission recommended that
vocational education be added to the school
curriculum.
6Precursors to the Smith Acts
- Burkett-Pollard Bill (NE) (1906)
- sought federal aid for the teaching of
agriculture in normal (teacher training) schools - Clay-Livingston Bill (GA) - 1907
- sought federal aid to establish an agricultural
high school in each congressional district in the
United States
7Precursorscont..
- Nelson Amendment (1907)
- Amendment to the Morrill Act of 1890
- provided 5,000 for five years, 25,000 annually
after five year to land-grant colleges for
general support. - One special provision of the amendment opened
the door to prepare teachers of agriculture . .
.
8Nelson Amendment
- money could be used for providing courses for
the special preparation of instructors for
teaching the elements of agriculture and the
mechanical arts. - summer school sessions for teachers were utilized
extensively (especially elementary teachers) - some 4 year teacher training in agriculture
started
9Precursors
- Davis Bill (MN) (1907)
- sought federal support for secondary school
instruction in agriculture, home economics and
the mechanical arts and branch experiment
stations
10Precursors
- McLaughlin Bill (1909)
- sought federal support for extension work
- Dolliver (IA)-Davis (MN) Bill (1910)
- sought federal support for extension work and
secondary vocational education (Dolliver
submitted two bills one for extension, one for
vocational education but they were combined by
the Senate Ag Committee. Things looked good for
the bill but Dolliver unexpectedly died)
11Precursors
- Page Bill (1911, 1912, 1913)
- sought federal support for extension work, branch
experiment stations and secondary vocational
education (this was basically the Dolliver bill) - The bill never passed for a variety of reasons
- bills tried to accomplish too much, which divided
the support - Some folks supported extension but not vocational
education and vice versa - Page was not very skilled as a legislator
12The Incompetent Senator!
13Senator Page
The Morrill Act has proven to be the beginning
for really carrying vocational education to the
masses of our people.
14Precursors
- Smith-Lever Bill (1912)
- goal was to establish the extension service
- This competed with the Page Bill
- The Great Compromise
- The supporters of vocational education would
support the Smith-Lever Bill. In return, a
Commission on National Aid to Vocational
Education would be created to study the need for
federal funding for vocational education.
15Finally!!
- Smith-Lever Act (1914)
- established the extension service
16Commission on National Aid to Vocational Education
- As part of the compromise, the Commission was
stacked with supporters of Vocational Education - The Commission collected data and held hearings
- The Commission reported there was a need for
vocational education in the schools and that it
should be federally funded. - It took some time for the bill they drafted to
pass because of issues surrounding World War I.
(Charles Prosser, a committee member wrote the
legislation. Smith and Hughes didnt)
17Finally!!
- Smith-Hughes Act (1917)
- provided federal funds to support vocational
education in the public schools
18The Smith Acts
19Smith-Lever Provisions
- there may be inaugurated in connection with the
(land-grant) college or colleges...agricultural
extension work which shall be carried on in
cooperation with the United States Department of
Agriculture
20Smith-Lever Provisions
- ...in any State in which two or more such
colleges have been or hereafter may be
established, the appropriations hereinafter made
to such State shall be administered by such
college or colleges as the legislature of such
State may direct
21Smith-Lever Provisions
- That cooperative agricultural extension work
shall consist of the giving of instruction and
practical demonstrations in agriculture and home
economics to persons not attending or resident in
said colleges in the several communities, and
imparting to such persons information on said
subjects through field demonstrations,
publications, and otherwise
22Smith-Lever Provisions
- Each state was to receive ...10,000 of which
shall be paid annually - Additional funds were to be disbursed to states
on the basis of the rural population of each
State bears to the total rural population of all
the States - Note Legislators in the Midwest wanted the act
to say farm population. The South had a much
larger rural population than farm population.
23Smith-Lever Provisions
- A state could not receive the additional funds
...until an equal sum has been appropriated for
that year by the legislature of such State, or
provided by State, county, college, local
authority, or individual contributions from
within the State, for the maintenance of the
cooperative agricultural extension work provided
for in this Act.
24Smith-Lever Provisions
- That before the funds herein appropriated shall
become available to any college for any fiscal
year, plans for the work to be carried on under
this Act shall be submitted by the proper
officials of each college and approved by the
Secretary of Agriculture
25Smith-Lever Provisions
- ...no portion of said moneys shall be applied,
directly or indirectly, to the purchase,
erection, preservation, or repair of any building
or buildings, or the purchase or rental of land,
or in college-course teaching, lectures in
colleges, promoting agricultural trains, or any
other purpose not specified in this Act
26Smith-Hughes Provisions
- The first paragraph of the Smith-Hughes Act
contained four statements - 1. to provide for the promotion of vocational
education - The word promotion is misleading, a more
correct word would be establishment.
Tidbit Since the person (Charles Prosser) who
wrote the bill was Director of the National
Society for the Promotion of Industrial
Education, the word promotion might allude to
this organization
27Smith-Hughes Provisions
- 2. to provide for cooperation with the States in
the promotion of such education in agriculture
and the trades and industries - This statement defined what made up vocational
education. Why is home economics not mentioned?
The word home economics appears 17 other times in
the Act. It is believed by some that home
economics was not included in the earlier drafts
of the bills. Legend has it that Prossers wife
made him include home economics. The fact that it
is missing here gives credence to that legend. - Trades and industries covered a broad range of
jobs.
28Smith-Hughes Provisions
- 3. to provide for cooperation with the States in
the preparation of teachers of vocational
subjects - There was much concern over the supply of
qualified teachers. Two different paths were
taken in regards to vocational teacher training - Agriculture and Home Economics went with a 4 year
college degree as a requirement. At that point in
time, few public school teachers had four year
degrees. This was designed to assure a quality,
well-educated teacher and enhance the status of
of the field. - Trade and Industries chose to pull teachers out
of industry. The belief was the master craftsman
made the best teacher.
29Smith-Hughes Provisions
- 4. and to appropriate money and regulate its
expenditure. - This wording as to the purpose of an act is a
little strange. It should be self evident.
30Smith-Hughes Funds
- Provided money to pay salaries of
- teachers, supervisors, and directors of
agricultural subjects - Tidbit Director is an unusual word until one
notes that agricultural schools had been
established prior to Smith-Hughes in
Massachusetts. The person in charge of these
schools was a Director. Since Prosser had been
associate superintendent for vocational education
in Massachusetts, this wording isnt that strange
at all.
31Smith-Hughes Funds
- Provided money to pay salaries of
- teachers of trade, home economics and industrial
subjects (but no more than 20 of the total money
allocated for this purpose could be spent in the
area of home economics) - Question Why could Smith-Hughes funds be used to
pay salaries of supervisors and directors in
agriculture but not in home economics or trades
and industries? - Question 2 Why was home economics limited to
20?
32Smith-Hughes
- Tidbit Teachers who received their salaries from
the Smith-Hughes Act were often called
Smith-Hughes teachers to distinguish them from
teachers in schools not receiving Smith-Hughes
funding. Agriculture and home economics was
taught in many other schools but not all schools
received Smith-Hughes monies because of limited
funds.
33Smith-Hughes Funds
- Providing money for teacher training
Tidbit State supervisors of each vocational
subject were given authority over the teacher
trainers. Federal level supervisors checked the
qualifications and approved of the hiring of
teacher educators. Many universities became very
dependent upon federal funds to pay vocational
teacher educators. When this funding was
abolished it created shock waves in many states
and institutions of higher education.
34Smith-Hughes Funds
- The states did not have to use all the provisions
of the act. For example, if there were no
agriculture programs, it didnt have to ask for
the agriculture money. However - Before a state could receive monies for salaries
for any vocational teacher, it must first accept
the teacher training monies. This indicates the
federal government was serious about training
teachers.
35Smith-Hughes Funding
- Specific amounts of money were allocated to each
vocational discipline - Agricultural appropriations were based on each
states rural population - Home economics appropriations were based on each
states urban population - Trade and industrial appropriations were based on
each states urban population - There was to be a 50-50 federal-state match on
all salaries
36Smith-Hughes Act - Agriculture
- ...under public supervision or control...
- ...controlling purpose...shall be to fit for
useful employment - ...shall be of less than college grade
- ...meet the needs of persons over fourteen years
of age who have entered upon or who are preparing
to enter upon the work of the farm or of the farm
home - Question Does the previous phrase also mean
adult education?
37Smith-Hughes - Agriculture
- ...that such schools shall provide for directed
or supervised practice in agriculture, either on
a farm provided for by the school or other farm,
for at least six months per year - This was interpreted to mean that each student
(including adults) is to have a project (crops
or livestock). - If the teacher is to supervise it, then the
teacher will need to be employed during the
summer. This is the basis for 12 month employment
of agriculture teachers.
38Smith-Hughes Funds
- Provided money to create a Federal Board for
Vocational Education for the administration of
this act and for the purpose of making studies,
investigations, and reports to aid in the
organization and conduct of vocational education - Question Why did Congress create a special board
to administer vocational education? - Answer They were afraid to turn vocational
education over to the entrenched education
bureaucrats who had been classically educated
(remember what happened at UNC.)
39Federal Board for Vocational Education
- The Board Consisted of
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of Commerce
- Secretary of Labor
- Commissioner of Education
- Three citizens appointed by the President
- agriculture
- manufacturing and commerce
- labor
40Federal Board
- The Commissioner of Education may make such
recommendations to the Board relative to the
administration of this act as he may from time to
time deem advisable. - It shall be the duty of the chairman of the
board to carry out the rules, regulations, and
decisions which the board may adopt.
41Federal Board
- The Federal Board hired a staff to handle the
daily operations and do the real work. - Charles Prosser was hired as the Executive
Director - Federal supervisors were hired in the areas of
- Agriculture (N7)
- Trades and Industries (N7)
- Home Economics (N3)
- Commercial Subjects (N3) (see next slide)
- Research (3)
42Federal Board
- Tidbit One of the areas of investigation the
Federal Board could pursue (as specifically
mentioned in the act) was commercial education.
Also, a division of commercial education was
established with three federal supervisors, but
no Smith-Hughes money was allocated to salaries
of teachers of Commercial Education. A little
strange. - Today we would call Commercial Education
Marketing Education and Business Education.
43Original Federal Regions
North Atlantic
West Central
North Central
Pacific
Ag and TI had regional offices.Two Ag
supervisors worked the South one was for Black
schools.
Southern
44Federal Regions -1920
North Atlantic
Pacific
North Central
Southern
In 1920 one region was eliminated and all the
regional people moved to Washington.
45Federal Board
- Because of the depression, the federal government
was restructured in the 1930s. - In 1933 the administrative responsibilities and
staff of the Federal Board were transferred to
the Department of the Interior, Office of
Education. - The Federal Board continued to operate as an
advisory board until 1946 when it was abolished.
(Clarence Poe was a member)
46Memorandum of Understanding
- In 1918 a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was
established between federal officials responsible
for vocational agriculture and for extension. - This MOU was revised from time to time.
- A brief description of each program was provided,
then specific duties of each were outlined.
47Memorandum of Understanding
- Unless the activity is specifically related to
classes taught, the agriculture teacher is not to
do extension activities. However, it is
recognized there may be isolated instances where
the agricultural teacher is called upon by
farmers in the school district. This should
represent a small and incidental part of the
job.
48Memorandum of Understanding
- Teachers of vocational agriculture or
representatives of vocational agricultural work
should be invited to participate in all meetings
conducted by the extension service for the
formulation of county and State agricultural
programs.
49Memorandum of Understanding
- The extension service should not enroll
vocational agriculture students in 4-H. - Services should not overlap.
50America at War
51The War Years (WWI)
Acres in crop production
52The War Years (WWI)
53Food Production Act -1917
- Signed into law on August 10, 1917
- This is the sleeper extension act
54 Food Production Act Provisions
- Livestock Production (885,000)
- Disease and pest control, enlargement of
livestock production, conservation and
utilization of meat
55 Food Production Act Provisions
- Seed Production (2,500,000)
- Procuring, storingand furnishing seeds
56Food Production Act Provisions
- Crop Production (441,000)
- Prevention, control and eradication of insects
and plant diseases
57Food Production Act Provisions
- Extension (4,348,400)
- Increase food production and eliminate waste
through educational and demonstration methods
through county, district and urban agents and
others
58Impact on Extension
- By the end of October 1,600 emergency
demonstration agents were hired - Act was to terminate at the end of the War
59Increase in Extension Agents 1917 to 1918
60Extension Staff 1918
61Yearbook of Agriculture, 1918
- Report of the Secretary of Agriculture
- The emergency through which the Nation has
passed only served to emphasize the supreme
importance of the Cooperative Agricultural
Extension Service. It has become increasingly
clear that no more important piece of education
extension machinery has ever been created. It
has been amply demonstrated that the most
effective means of getting information to the
farmers and their families is through the direct
touch of well-trained men and women.
62Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1918
- What had just happened to prompt this legislation?
63The Roaring 20s (for whom?)
Good times soon followed
64 The Roaring 20s??
- Agricultural Prices dropped 33 from 1919 to
1920 - Agricultural Prices dropped 54 from 1920 to
1921
65Plumbing in the 1920s
- 1 out of 10 farm homes had water indoors
- 1 out of 2 farm homes had sinks
- 1 out of 64 farm homes had a water closet, the
rest had outhouses - Most laundry was done outside
66Identifying the Problem
- Joint Commission of Agricultural Inquiry -1921
- National Agricultural Conference -1922
- Agricultural Conference of 1925
- Nothing much was accomplished by any of the
conferences
67The Farm Bloc
- A group of 12 senators who organized themselves
in 1921 to promote and support agricultural
legislation ranks eventually grew to include 22
senators - Non-partisan
- Similar group, though less effective, was formed
in the House
68Capper-Volstead Act - 1922
- Enabled the development of agricultural
cooperatives
69Clark-McNary Act - 1924
- Section 5 of the act provided for cooperative
farm-forestry work
70Purnell Act - 1925
- Authorized funds for economic research in
agricultural experiment stations (this has
implications down the road for extension)
71Capper-Ketchum Act - 1928
- Providing additional funding for extension
- Specified 80 of the funds were to be used for
salaries of extension agents - Identified youth activities as being part of
extension - Equal number of men and women to be appointed as
agents - Money could support agriculture trains
72Capper-Ketchum Act
- Gladys Bull, a 4-H member who was attending the
national 4-H camp, testified before Congress in
support of the Capper-Ketchum bill. - Her testimony was powerful and showed the value
of 4-H club work.
73Subsequent Vocational Education Acts
- George-Reed Act --1929-1934
- George-Ellzey Act --1934 -1937
- George-Deen Act -- 1936 (1938)
- increased (14.5 million total)
- also funded distributive education (1.2 million)
- 1st to U.S. Territories
- Distributive Education funded
- George-Barden Act (1946)
- increased (28.8 mil)
- provided for veterans training
74George-Reed Act - 1929
- Provide additional financial support for
vocational education - Money was equally divided between agriculture
and home economics - Ag money based on farm population
- Home economics money based on rural population
- Funds were used to hire subject matter
specialists in agriculture at the federal level
75The Great Depression - 1930s
76 The Great Depression
- Gross Farm Income in 1932 was 1/2 of that of
1929 - Net income per farm in 1932 was estimated by
USDA at 230 - Between 1920-1933 15,000 banks suspended
operation - (The NC FFA lost 350 in a bank closure in 1931)
- 4,000 banks alone closed in 1933
77Era of Farm Legislation
- Agricultural Adjustment Act - 1933
- Farmers agreed to reduce acreage in surplus crops
in return for benefit payments - Farm Credit Administration - 1933
- Soil Conservation Act - 1935
- Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act -
1936 - Rural Electrification Act - 1936
78Electricity in the 1930s
79George-Elzy Act (1934)
- Provided additional funding for vocational
education - Money was evenly divided between
- agriculture
- home economics
- trade and industrial education (amount determined
by non-farm population)
80Bankhead-Jones Act -1935
- Title 1 - More money for basic agricultural
research - Title 2 - Further Development of Cooperative
Extension - 8 million the first year
- 2 million each year until 12 million is
reached
81George-Deen Act (1936)
- More for vocational education.
- Recognized Distributive Education as a part of
vocational education. - Federal funds could be used to support travel of
vocational teachers. - President Roosevelt was reluctant to sign the
bill because general education needed help also.
82During the Depression
- Extension affected the most
- Agents typically held 1-3 educational meetings
in each township to explain AAA rules and
regulations
83Depression years
- Extension
- Assisted in making Federal Emergency Relief
Administration feed and seed loans - Tried to convince farmers to reduce acreage (buy
into the government programs) - Convinced farmers that electricity would not
make the cows go dry
84Depression Years
- Lost employees (in 1938)
- SCS - 159
- Farm Security Administration - 154
- AAA - 97
85Ag Ed Enrollments
86Homemaking Enrollments
87The END
88Agricultural and Vocational Education
- From the Depression to Sputnik
89The 1940s
90 World War II
- 4-H and FFA
- Collected scrap metal, rubber, burlap, rags and
paper - Sold war bonds
- Grew victory gardens (Feed a Fighter was the
1943 4-H theme) - Repaired and built farm machinery in the Ag
Shop. Tractor and farm implement manufacturers
were concentrating on war equipment.
91Virginia FFA Activities
92- 4-Hers sold old phonograph records in order to
buy ambulances for the war effort.
934-H Victory Pins
94WW II Posters
95FFA Chapters sold War Bonds
96WWII
- Many high school agricultural programs
established food preservation centers - They still exist in Georgia and Louisiana
- Primary emphasis was canning vegetables
- Some had slaughtering facilities also
- A number of schools in NC had these food
preservation centers
97WWII
- Served as Victory Farm Volunteers
- FFA considered buying a bomber but eventually
decided not to - National FFA Convention limited attendance to
official delegates and award winners because of
war time travel restrictions
98A metal won by a 4-H member
99Four-H
- 4-H members across the nation gathered scrap
metal to build ships to transport war supplies
and food to Europe. If members in a state raised
enough funds, they could name the ship (called
liberty ships) - NC 4-H christens two liberty ships USS Tyrrell
and the USS Cassius Hudson
100(No Transcript)
1014-H Scrap Drive
102WWII
- After the war vocational agriculture launched
major educational programs for servicemen under
the provisions of the GI Bill of Rights - Most agriculture teachers taught 3-4 night
classes on farming to returning veterans to help
them get back into farming and to learn shop
skills. - Teachers received extra pay and schools received
substantial funds to buy equipment for classes.
103GI Bill of Rights
- The benefits of this act were later extended to
- Korean conflict veterans
- Viet Nam Vets
- Agricultural teachers conducted night classes for
these vets also
104Bankhead-Flannigan Act - 1945
- Increase funding for extension
- No more than 2 could be spent in the USDA
105George-Barden Act (1946)
- Increased funding for vocational education
- Indicated federal funds could be used to support
travel associated with the Future Farmers of
America and the New Farmers of America (this
provides the legal basis for the position that
FFA is an integral part of agricultural
education) - Money could be used on vocational guidance
106Agricultural Marketing Act (1946)
- Authorized extension programs in marketing,
transportation, and distribution of agricultural
products (starting to move outside of the just
farming and farm homemaker mentality for
extension).
107Joint Committee Report on Extension Programs,
Policies, Goals (1948)
- During the 1930s and 40s the extension service
was called on to perform various duties for the
national interest. - During the depression extension was charged with
teaching people about the various government
programs and encouraging farmers to participate. - In the 40s the mission changed to winning the
war.
108Joint Committee Report
- Now that peace was at hand and there was no
longer a depression, what should the extension
service do? - Another factor was that many of the extension
employees were new. - There was also some questions about the
relationship of the extension service and farm
organizations. - (in some states extension was working out of the
Farm Bureau office. In some states each was
viewed as competition )
109Joint Committee Report
- A joint committee appointed by the Secretary of
Agriculture and the National Association of State
Universities and Land Grant Colleges was
appointed to study the mission of the extension
service. - The 10 person panel examined the mission and
goals of the extension service. - No public hearings were held but the committee
consulted with government agency heads and
leaders of farm organization.
110Joint Committee Report
- Their report is sometimes called the Kepner
report because P. V. Kepner of the Federal
Extension Service was assigned to assist the
committee and compiled the final report.
111Joint Committee Report
- Some of the key points/impacts of the report
were - Agriculture, home economics and 4-H groups are
the primary audience for extension. However, it
was noted that urban audiences could not be
ignored. - Continued emphasis on the importance of
one-on-one contacts, meetings, and
demonstrations. - Changed/improved relationships with farm
organizations - Established stronger tie between CES to academic
base (specialists assigned to academic department
instead of being housed in extension
administration)
112Clarke-McNary Amendment (1949)
- Authorized USDA to cooperate with land-grant
colleges in aiding farmers through advice,
education, demonstration, etc. in establishing,
renewing, protecting and managing wood lots and
in harvesting, utilizing, and marketing the
products thereof.
113Smith-Lever Act Amendment (1953)
- Consolidated all the previous extension
legislation - Inserted the words and subjects relating
thereto after agriculture and home economics - What are the implications of this?
- Established a new funding formula based on
rural/urban population
114A Look Back
- In 1892 the Supreme Court established the
doctrine that "separate but equal" was a valid
way to handle race relationships (Plessy vs.
Ferguson). - The court case involving railroad cars in
Louisiana. The races could be segregated as long
as each race was treated equally. - This decision impacted the operation of schools
and the extension service until the 1960s.
115Brown vs. Board of Education - Topeka (1954)
- This Supreme Court ruling overturned Plessy vs.
Ferguson. "Separate but equal" was ruled
unconstitutional. - The case dealt with equal access to educational
opportunities. - Over the next few years, this would have
implications for extension and vocational
education.
116Smith-Lever Amendment (1955)
- Authorized work with disadvantaged farms and farm
families
117Russians launch Sputnik (1957)
- In 1957 the Russians launched Sputnik. This event
sent shock waves through out America. Perhaps
American education was falling behind. - We needed to put more emphasis on science,
mathematics, foreign language and technology in
order to catch up.
118National Defense Education Act (1958)
- This act was passed because of Sputnik
- The Congress finds that an educational emergency
exists and requires action by the federal
government. Assistance will come from Washington
to help develop as rapidly as possible those
skills essential to the national defense. - A major purpose of the act was strengthen the
teaching of mathematics, sciences and modern
foreign languages
119National Defense Education Act (1958)
- Established a student loan program for college
- The George-Barden Act of 1946 was amended
- Area Vocational Schools were to be built to train
technicians skilled in math and science - Many of these schools offered agricultural
programs - 15 million dollars for the next five years was
authorized for this purpose - Health Occupations Education was recognized as a
part of vocational education
Link to a Summary of the NDEA Act
120A Statement of Scope and Responsibility (A Guide
to Extension Programs in the Future) (1958)
- The Russians had launched Sputnik.
- There were farm surpluses and low prices
- It had been 10 years since the last study of
extension. - A committee of ECOP (Extension Committee on
Organization and Policy) was appointed to study
the future of extension (ECOP is a committee
within NASULGC).
121A Statement of Scope and Responsibility
- This group appointed nine task forces in the
following areas - Production
- Marketing
- Resources
- Management
- Family
- Youth
- Leadership
- Community
- Public Affairs
122A Statement of Scope and Responsibility
- The task forces were composed of various leaders
in extension. The report, commonly called the
Scope Report, "represents the best thinking of
leading Extension workers on how, where, what and
with whom the Cooperative Extension Service will
be working for many years to come."
123The Scope Report
- The primary outcome of the report was to broaden
the scope of extension by emphasizing management,
marketing and public policy. Each task force had
specific suggestions about subject matter,
clientele, methodology, training, and
relationships. Several broad recommendations/obse
rvations were found in the report.
124Selected Scope Report Recommendations
- There will be new programs which cannot be
handled by traditional methods of staffing and
organization. - There will be programs for new "publics"
- There will be programs that cross departmental or
organizational lines - The extension staff of the future will have more
specialized personnel at every level. - Regular training at the post-graduate level will
be expected of virtually all Extension workers.
125Selected Scope Report Recommendations
- Training must go beyond technical subject matter
for the expanded job of adult education that
Extension must be prepared to do. - Training must be continuous.
- Some "re-training" will be needed to give
certain Extension workers new skills or knowledge
to handle specific changes in their job.
126Selected Scope Report Recommendations
- One goal of every training program must be to
get the individual Extension worker to re-examine
and re-define frequently his own job the scope of
his responsibilities, and relationship to
others. - Sound program planning procedures will strengthen
every aspect of Extension work. - Research has been, is, and will continue to be
the basic resource on which all our programs draw.
127Selected Scope Report Recommendations
- The teaching methods used will need to be
tailored to specific jobs to be done. - All teaching procedures must be continuously
evaluated and improvements made in light of the
evaluations. - In its work with mass media, Extension will need
to maintain a highly competitive level of
professional performance.
128Selected Scope Report Recommendations
- With the growing complexity of problems with
which it deals, Extension must provide adequate
materials and support for local leaders.
129The Scope Report
- This report is often referred to by the
old-timers in extension as a major report. - It clearly showed that extension was in an era of
change. - High school agriculture would soon change also.
130Panel of Consultants on Vocational Education
(1962)
- After John Kennedy became president, he
requested that a special panel be convened to
study vocational education. Vocational education
was still operating under the provisions of the
Smith-Hughes Act but America had changed
considerably.
131Panel of Consultants
- The panel was composed of people from the
education profession, labor, industry,
agriculture as well as the lay public and
representatives from the Departments of
Agriculture and Labor. - The panel was appointed in 1961 and issued their
report, "Education for a Changing World of Work"
in 1962. - The panel recommended that vocational offerings
be expanded, updated, and be made available to
all people. (more later when we look at the
Vocational Education Act of 1963)
132End of an Era
- The launching of the Sputnik by the Russians and
the ensuing events of the 1960s heralded a new
era in agricultural education and extension
legislation. - The times, they are changing.
- We are about ready to leave the sow, cow, plow
and the stitching and stirring era. - We will see what happened in future lessons
133The County Agent Will Change!
1344-H work will change!
135So will FFA and Ag. Ed.
136Federal Legislation Impacting Vocational
Education 1950 - on
137Post Sputnik Legislation
- Legislation affecting Vo. Ed. After the 1950s was
more complex and convoluted than earlier
legislation. - We will discuss only the parts of the acts
impacting Vo. Ed., even though the act may have
numerous other components.
138National Defense Education Act (1958)
- This act was passed because of Sputnik
- The Congress finds that an educational emergency
exists and requires actionby the federal
government. Assistance will come from Washington
to help develop as rapidly as possible those
skills essential to the national defense. - A major purpose of the act was strengthen the
teaching of mathematics, sciences and modern
foreign languages
139National Defense Education Act (1958)
- Established a student loan program for college
- The George-Barden Act of 1946 was amended
- Area Vocational Schools were to be built to train
technicians skilled in math and science - 15 million dollars for the next five years was
authorized for this purpose
140Vocational Education Act of 1963
- This was a MAJOR piece of federal legislation. It
replaced the Smith-Hughes Act. - Categorical funding for specific vocational
disciplines such as agricultural education was
abolished. - Funding went to states on the basis of their
population in certain age categories - States decided how to spend the money
141Vocational Education Act of 1963
- Expanded the scope of agricultural education to
include all areas of agriculture, not just
farming. - No longer required supervised practice on a
farm. The idea was to expand the scope of SAE,
not do away with it, but that is what some states
did. - Expanded the scope of home economics education to
include all areas of home economics, not just
homemaking.
142Vocational Education Act of 1963
- Established work study programs for vocational
students to provide financial support - States had to submit plans for what they planned
to do - Eliminated federal supervision/control of
vocational programs - Funding for vocational education was
substantially increased
143Educational Amendments (1968)
- Amended the 1963 Vocational Education Act
- Increased funding for vocational education
- Funds could be used for high school programs,
people who have left school, retraining, special
needs students, construction of area vocational
schools, vocational guidance, contracting
vocational education with private institutions,
ancillary services (research, teacher training)
and administering the state plan.
144Educational Amendments (1968)
- Did not categorically fund specific vocational
programs, with one exception - Specifically allocated money to Consumer and
Homemaking Education - Of the general appropriations to each state
- 25 had to be spent on disadvantaged populations
- 25 had to be spent on out-of-schoolindividuals
seeking employment - 10 had to be spent on handicappedindividuals
145Educational Amendments (1968)
- Authorized money for
- Curriculum development (this is the only place
agricultural education is mentioned in the act) - Residential vocational schools (schools with
dorms) - Research (National Center for Vocational
Education Research was established) - Leadership development (selected vocational
leaders could get advanced degrees)
146Educational Amendments (1976)
- The Educational Amendments of 1976 have five
Titles, Title II is concerned with vocational
education - Authorized more money for vocational education
- Purpose of the act was to
- extend, improve and maintain programs
- overcome come sex discrimination/bias
- develop new programs
147Educational Amendments (1976)
- Monies could be spent on vocational education
programs, work study, energy education, area
school facilities, support sex equity positions,
placement services, Industrial Arts (now
Technology Education), support services for
females in non-traditional programs, day
careservices, displaced homemakers, residential
vocational centers.
148Educational Amendments (1976)
- There were special appropriations for the
disadvantaged - Consumer and Homemaking received special funding
- Every vocational program had to be evaluated
every five years
149Carl Perkins Act (1984)
- This was the most significant rewrite of
vocational education legislation since 1963. - Two broad themes
- Accessibility to all persons
- Improve the quality
150Carl Perkins Act (1984)
- Fifty-seven (57) percent of state funds were
allocated to special populations - vocational
education was to be accessible to everyone - handicapped (10)
- disadvantaged (10)
- adult retraining (12)
- single parents homemakers (8 1/2)
- sex bias stereotyping (3 1/2)
- incarcerated (1)
151Carl Perkins Act (1984)
- Forty-three (43) percent of state funds were
allocated for program improvement - funds were not to be used to maintain existing
programs - Consumer and Homemaking received special funding
but 1/3 had to be spent in economically depressed
areas - There will be a full time sex equity coordinator
and 60,000 is allocated to that
152Perkins II (1990)
- The Carl Perkins Act is rewritten
- Special populations is still a major focus,
- Money can be used to support existing programs
- Academic and vocational education was to be
integrated - Articulation between secondary and post-secondary
institutions
153School-to-Work Opportunities Act (1994)
- A variety of programs were established for
students to get them more involved with the world
of work and post-secondary education - Grants were given to some states to develop
programs - This is for all students
- Funding is temporary
154Perkins III (1998)
- This is the legislation vocational education is
currently operating under - The purpose of this Act is to develop more fully
the academic, vocational, and technical skills of
secondary students and post-secondary students
who elect to enroll in vocational and technical
education programs (little emphasis on special
populations)
Perkins
155Perkins III (1998)
- At the local levels funds can be spent on
- strengthening the academic, and vocational and
technical skills of students - providing students with strong experience in and
understanding of all aspects of an industry - developing, improving, or expanding the use of
technology in vocational and technical education - providing professional development programs to
teachers, counselors, and administrators
156Perkins III (1998)
- conducting evaluations of the vocational and
technical education programs ...including how the
needs of special populations are being met - initiating, improving, expanding, and modernizing
quality vocational and technical education
programs - linking secondary vocational and technical
education and post-secondary vocational and
technical education, including implementing
tech-prep programs.
157Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA P.L.
105220)
- Reforms Federal employment, adult education, and
vocational rehabilitation programs to create an
integrated, "onestop" system of workforce
investment and education activities for adults
and youth. Entities that carry out post-secondary
vocational and technical education activities
assisted under the Perkins Vocational and
Technical Education Act are mandatory partners in
this onestop delivery system. - Title I of WIA authorizes workforce investment
programs and activities that are administered by
the Employment and Training Administration of the
U.S. Department of Labor. Learn more about the
implementation of Title I of
WIA.
158Conclusion
- Legislation for Vocational Education during the
past 50 years has been influenced greatly by
changing societal and environmental concerns. - Federal legislation has often mandated what we
are to do. - The focus has shifted to helping certain groups
of people.
159Key Legislation
- Vocational Education Act of 1963
- Educational Amendments 1968 and 1976
- Carl Perkins Act I (1984)
- Carl Perkins Act II (1990)
- School-to-Work, Opportunities Act (1994)
- Carl Perkins Act III (1998)
160The end..
161Legislative Mandates for Extension
- Natural-resource-based economic development
162Legislative Mandates for Extension
- Agricultural telecommunications
- youth-at-risk
- Renewable resources
- Subsistence farming on Native American
reservations - Establish and operate centers of rural technology
- Outreach and assistance for socially
disadvantaged farmers - Rural health and safety education
- Nutrition education and consumer education
- 1890 extension work
163Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act
(1990)
- Expanded EFNEP
- Established five regional aquaculture centers
for research and Extension activities - Repealed previous solar energy provisions
164Legislative Mandates for Extension
Various minor amendments and laws have mandated
that Extension work in the following areas
- Pesticide impact assessment
- Groundwater quality
- Financially stressed and/or dislocated farmers
- Food safety
- Nutrition and family education
- Urban gardening
- Pest management
- Farm safety and rural health
- Rural development
165Food and Agriculture Act (1977)
- A Major Farm Bill
- Authorized 260 million for Extension
- Authorized agricultural and forestry extension
activities at 1890 institutions - 4 of Smith-Lever Funds must go to 1890
institutions - Extension leaders of 1862 and 1890 institutions
are to develop a comprehensive state-wide plan
for extension
166Food and Agriculture Act (1977)
- Added the use of solar energy with respect to
agriculture and solar energy demonstration
projects - Established a national food and human nutrition
research and education program - Required the secretary of agriculture to evaluate
the Extension Service by 1979
167Food and Agriculture Act (1977)
- Directed the secretary to assist the Agency for
International Development (AID) with
agricultural research and extension in
developing countries - Established a National Agricultural Research and
Extension Users Advisory Board
168Renewable Resources Extension Act (1978)
- Provided for educational programs concentrating
on renewable resources, which includes fish and
wildlife management, range management, timber
management, and watershed management, as well as
forest and range-based outdoor recreation,
trees and forests in urban areas, and trees and
shrubs in shelter belts.
169Food Security Act (1985)
- A major farm bill
- Provided grants to upgrade 1890 institutions
extension facilities - Made several technical amendments to fine tune
past farm bills
170Agriculture and Food Act (1981)
- A Major Farm Bill
- Authorized appropriations for Extension programs
(including 1890 programs) - Provided for the employment and training of
professionals and paraprofessional aides to
engage in nutrition education of low-income
families.
171Agriculture and Food Act (1981)
- Authorized aquaculture extension work
- Authorized rural development programs and small
farm extension programs - Authorized the secretary of agriculture to
conduct an annual evaluation of agricultural
research, extension and teaching programs.
172Sea Grant Program (1966)
- The National Sea Grant Collegeand Program Act
- Established a program (under the Dept. of
Commerce) to provide for applied research, formal
education and extension for development of marine
and Great Lake resources. About 2/3 of the states
involved have incorporated these activities in
the extension service.
173FAIR Act (1996)
- Our current farm bill is titled the Federal
Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act. - Some people call it the Freedom to Farm Act.
- Title VIII contains provisions for Research,
Extension, and Education - However, because other sections of the bill were
so controversial little attention was paid to
this section of the bill. Most extension related
items were merely extended. However, there were a
few new twists. - It contains provisions for extension, but for the
first time has language for secondary
agricultural education.
174FAIR Act (1996)
- Authority for secondary and 2-year post secondary
education in agriscience and agribusiness are
added to the Secretary's food and agricultural
education authorities - This was an attempt to transfer national
leadership for secondary agricultural education
to USDA from USDE - It partially succeeded, language is present in
the bill authorizing it--but there is no money to
do it, so nothing has happened
175FAIR Act (1996)
- Even though the national leadership for
agricultural education did not move (one
representative in the house effectively blocked
the move) a 500,000 challenge grant program to
improve secondary agricultural education has been
established under authority of the USDA. - USDE provides national leadership for
agricultural education but USDA is providing
funds to improve the program
176FAIR Act (1996)
- A National Research, Education, and Economics
Advisory Board is established. (This 30-member
advisory board replaces three separate advisory
committees)
177FAIR Act (1996)
- There were provisions in the act related to
- Native American extension programs
- 1890 extension programs
- Appropriations for the Extension Service
- Other provisions of the Act contain language
reducing price supports for many agricultural
commodities - The Fund for Rural America was created to enhance
community development
178Smith-Lever Amendment (1980)
- Inserted references to rural energy in Section 2.
179Smith-Lever Amendment (1985)
- Added language that the Extension Service give
instruction and practical demonstrations of
existing or improved practices or technologies. - Authorized Extension to enter into agreements
with private organizations and individuals. (in
other words extension could accept money from the
private sector) - Improve 1890s extension facilities
180Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act
(1990)
- A major farm bill
- Directed the Extension Service to catalogue the
federal, state, and local laws and regulations
that govern the handling of unused or unwanted
agricultural chemicals and agricultural chemical
containers. - Educational materials regarding this were to be
developed.
181Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act
(1990)
- Charged the Extension Service with teaching
composting - Expanded natural resources educational programs
- Established a water quality coordination program
- Provided for the assistance for the control of
weeds and pests
182National Forest Dependent Rural Communities
Economic Diversification Act (1990)
- Directed the Extension Service to provide
training and educational programs in rural
communities that are economically dependent upon
forest resources in an attempt to diversify the
economic base of the community.
183Rural Development Act (1972)
- Title V impacted Extension
- Authorized rural developmentand small-farm
extension programs - Administration of programs to be part of
Extension - Established State Rural Development Advisory
Councils
184National Agricultural Research, Extension and
Teaching Act (1994)
- Established extension education programs on
Native American reservations - Provided technical assistance and training in
subsistence agriculture to Native Americans and
Alaskan natives