Lead the Way APTA Standards Development Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Lead the Way APTA Standards Development Program

Description:

Crash Worthiness. Standard Rail Technical Specifications. Bus. Brake Systems/Suspension ... At the Mercy of the Court. Standard Exists. Not Followed. Maximum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: gerry3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lead the Way APTA Standards Development Program


1
Lead the WayAPTA Standards Development Program
Californias Public Community Transportation
Conference Monterey November 6, 2008
2
Topics of Discussion
  • APTA Standards Program Overview
  • Organization Programs
  • Outreach Implementation
  • Making the Case for Standards
  • Transit Industry Benefits
  • Individual Transit Agency Benefits
  • Industrys Role
  • Agencys Role

3
APTA Standards Program
  • To develop, implement and maintain standards,
    recommended practices and design guidelines to
    achieve safety, reliability and efficiency in
    transit system design and operation.

4
What are Standards? How are they developed?
  • Standards use collective wisdom to provide a path
    to a desired outcome with a means to measure
    success
  • Standards are developed using a consensus based
    process patterned after the process required by
    the American National Standards Institute to
    certify Standards Development Organizations.
  • APTAs Standards include
  • Standards
  • Recommended Practices
  • Guidelines
  • White Papers

5
Recognition
  • APTA Standards Program is recognized by
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
  • Department of Transportation (DOT)
  • Joint Program Office (JPO)
  • Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
  • Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
  • Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
  • Transport Canada
  • Canadian Urban Transport Association (CUTA)
  • Other SDOs, e.g., IEEE, SAE, ITE, AASHTO

6
FUNDING
  • PAST FUNDING
  • APTA Members 4.75 m 1.5 m equivalent labor
    (1996-2006)
  • Federal Partners 2.5 m Ind. Program funding
  • CURRENT FUNDING
  • Approximately 3 million labor per year
  • APTA members
  • Dues 650k
  • Volunteer Labor 2.6 million equivalent
  • (20 hrs15 mbrs6 mtgs36 WG40/hr)
  • Federal
  • FTA allocation 1.6 m (specific standards
    efforts)
  • Other federal grants 2 m (specific standards
    efforts)

7
APTAS STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ORGANIZATION
APTA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT COUNCIL (SDOC)
OTHER SDOS (AREMA, IEEE, ASHTO, SAE)
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES (FRA, JPO, DOT)
APTA TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT STAFF
TRANSPORT CANADA CUTA
PROGRAM POLICY PLANNING COMMITTEES Security,
Bus, Rail, Accessibility, Procurement, Commuter
Rail, TCIP
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPS
Funding
Technical Input
8
Standards Program Oversight Direction
  • Standards Development Oversight Council (SDOC)
  • 28 Members, divided equally between business and
    transit
  • Responsibilities
  • Set Priorities and Allocate Funds for New Transit
    Standards Program
  • Outreach and Awareness Activities
  • Monitor Activities of Other Standards Development
    Organizations
  • Partner with Federal Agencies

9
Developing Standards
  • Standards Policy Planning Committees
  • Report to the SDOC
  • Individual Program oversight
  • Identify standards priorities
  • Work plan development
  • Standing APTA committees provide technical
    oversight
  • Work groups develop standards

10
Statistics APTAsStandards Program
  • Voluntary Consensus Standards Process
  • Over 1500 Volunteer Participants
  • Over 45 Active Standards Development Committees
  • 250 Standards, Recommended Practices and
    Guidelines Completed, Approved and Posted on
    APTAs Web Site www.apta.com

11
The Process
  • APTA Standards are developed using a consensus
    based process patterned after the process
    required by ANSI
  • a balanced representation of interested parties
  • a required public comment period
  • a formal process to respond to comments
  • an appeal procedure
  • a balloting group broadly representative of the
    industry
  • a consensus, defined as a super-majority of the
    balloting group and
  • a formal way to respond to requests for
    interpretations of or changes to the standard

12
Current Standards Efforts
  • Commuter Rail
  • Vehicle Construction
  • Vehicle Maintenance
  • Inspection Maintenance Training
  • Passenger Emergency Systems
  • Mechanical Systems
  • Rail Transit
  • Operating Practices
  • Fixed Structures
  • Grade Crossings
  • Vehicle Inspections
  • Crash Worthiness
  • Standard Rail Technical Specifications
  • Bus
  • Brake Systems/Suspension
  • Passenger Environment
  • Power Train
  • Safety
  • Electronics
  • Training
  • Operations
  • Specifications
  • Bus Maint Facility Design
  • Performance Standards
  • Warranty Administration
  • In-Plant Vehicle Inspection
  • IT
  • TCIP (Transit Communication Interface Profiles
  • System Interface Message Sets
  • TRICE (Tool for TCIP use)
  • Technology Specifications
  • CCTV
  • Control System Security

13
Current Standards Efforts
  • Security
  • Fixed Infrastructure
  • Security Risk
  • Emergency Management
  • Accessibility
  • Demand Responsive Call Center Standards
  • Fixed Route Stop Announcement Standards
  • Rail Gap
  • Procurement
  • Terms Conditions
  • Procurement Planning Process
  • Risk Management
  • Technology Procurement
  • Farecard
  • Farecard reader interface
  • Farecard data configuration
  • Data financial security
  • IP rights
  • Revenue tracking and dividing
  • Credit card industry relationships
  • Sustainability
  • Climate Change
  • Urban Design Guidelines

14
New Standards Development - Sampling
  • PRESS Safety Appliance
  • PRESS Wheel Flange Angle
  • BUS Bus Maintenance Facility Design RP
  • BUS Bus Rapid Transit Standards
  • RAIL Hours of Service RP
  • RAIL Crash Energy Management Specification
  • ACCESSIBILITY Platform Gap RP
  • ACCESSIBILITY Call Center Wait Times RP
  • SECURITY CCTV Placement RP
  • SECURITY Bus Stop Placement RP
  • SECURITY Drills Exercises RP
  • SECURITY Security Emergency Plan Template
  • IT CCTV Specification Guidelines
  • UTFS Farecard System Guidelines Specification
  • PROCUREMENT Terms Conditions
  • PROCUREMENT Guideline RFP IFB


15
Industry Benefits
  • MinimizeGovernment Regulation
  • Effective Means of Self-Policing
  • Generally Much Less Costly than a Regulation
  • Reduce the Public/NTSB Pressure for Regulatory
    Action
  • Industry Influences Final Outcome
  • Considers the Impact on Operations
  • Promote Market Competition (performance
    standards)
  • - Reduce proprietary design and intellectual
    property problems
  • - Define interfaces and data formats
  • Assist New Transit Starts and New Market Players
    (they know the rules)
  • Improve Safety

16
Your Agency Benefits
  • Improve Safety Security
  • Shared Risk Across Industry, not just Agency
  • Use of Collective Wisdom save on labor
  • Provides a Basis for Specifications for
    Procurements
  • Reduces Proposal and Design/Development Costs
  • Promote Systems Integration
  • Reduces Capital and Operating Costs
  • Enhances Service Reliability

17
Safety Improvement
Prevention Training, Design Inspection, Operating
Practices
Response Mitigation
Investigation, Analysis Plan Maintenance
Fewer Accidents
Reduce Property Damage
Diminished Injuries
Fewer Fatalities
18
High Return on Investment
  • Crashworthiness Standards
  • Locomotives derailed at 68 mph
  • Both built to APTA Structural Standards
  • One struck a concrete building
  • One rolled over
  • Crew walked away
  • Fatalities likely in previous designs
  • Return On Investment
  • Two lives saved (2.6 m each)
  • Two 4 m locomotives repaired rather than scrapped

19
High Return on Investment
  • Bus Fires Standards
  • Prevention
  • Recommended Design for Fire Suppression Systems
  • Transit Bus Electrical Requirements for Fire
    Safety
  • Response Mitigation
  • Transit Bus Fire Safety Vehicle Shut Down
  • Recommended Practice for Bus Operator Training
    (Includes handling emergencies like vehicle
    fires)
  • Investigation
  • Fire investigation Form
  • Return On Investment
  • FY03 there were 226 bus fire incidents with 32
    Injuries. 62 fires caused major damage.
    Property damage alone was over 1 million.
    Current cost of the program less than 30,000.
    Current buses being build with new fire reduction
    strategies.

20
High Return on Investment
Controlling Tort Risks- Reducing Transit
Liability
  • Los Angeles Area Grade Crossing Collisions
  • with Fatalities/Injuries
  • System Safety Program Plan
  • Emergency Responder Training
  • Vehicle Crashworthiness
  • Vehicle and Signal System Inspection
  • and Maintenance


Return On Investment Liability Reduced by tens
of millions
21
Means to Respond to NTSB Recommendations
Hours of Service Standard NTSB, in response
to the Woodley Park WMATA Accident, stated that
FTA must Require transit agencies, through the
system safety program and hazard management
process, if necessary, to ensure that the time
off between daily tours of duty including regular
and overtime assignments, allows train operators
to obtain at least 8 hours of uninterrupted
sleep.
  • APTA Hours of Service Standard
  • Min Time Off Shifts 10 Hours
  • Max Shift
  • 14 hrs straight shift
  • 16 hrs split shirt with max of 14 hrs wk
  • Fatigue Mitigation Program
  • Policy re mandatory full days off

22
Standards Save Operating Cost A Real Example
  • Simplified training
  • Less complex manuals
  • Smaller inventory of spare parts
  • Decrease in vehicle down time
  • Less infant mortality problems
  • Smoother acceptance testing
  • More preventive and less reactive maintenance

23
Standards as a Public Relations Tool
  • High Visibility Incident Occurs
  • Media Looks for a Story
  • A Sensational Story Finding Fault and Placing
    Blame is Best
  • Standards Can Curb the Impending Feeding Frenzy
  • If the message is
  • Then Sensationalism is Minimized

The Agency followed widely accepted industry
practice.
24
Relief from Congressional Pressure Interagency
Cooperation
  • Security Standards Program
  • Provides a program where FTA and DHS (TSA)
    technical staff are working in partnership with
    Industry.
  • Return On Investment
  • Hundreds of thousands of dollars have been spent
    on security patches for transportation.
    Current program allows for capturing lessons
    learned and industry best practices from systems
    that have implemented successful strategies.
    Also allows DHS (TSA) to vet security ideas with
    the industry rather than forcing a fit on
    strategies that might not be successful in an
    operating environment.
  • Example Nashville MTA Preparing to purchase
    trash containers for new transit facility. 5k
    each. Industry standard program gave other
    options Money saved.

25
YOU CAN GET INVOLVED!!
  • Appoint Standards Lead Contact for your Agency
  • Get Involved
  • Provide input for standards development
  • Send technical experts to standards meetings
  • Review and comment on standards being developed
  • Commit to Adoption and Implementation of
    Standards
  • Commitment Agreement

26
  • Resources

27
Website www.apta.com

28
APTA Standards Program Staff
  • Standards Program and SDOC
  • Lurae Stuart, lstuart_at_apta.com (202)496-4844
  • Rail and Commuter Rail
  • Tom Peacock tpeacock_at_apta.com, (202) 496-4805
  • Bus
  • Lurae Stuart, lstuart_at_apta.com (202)496-4844
  • Sustainability
  • Rich Weaver, rweaver_at_apta.com (202) 496-
  • IT
  • Lou Sanders, lsanders_at_apta.com (202) 496-4886
  • Farecard
  • Martin Schroeder, mschroeder_at_apta.com (202)
    496-4885
  • Security
  • Greg Hull, ghull_at_apta.com (202) 496-4815
  • Accessibility
  • Pam Boswell, pboswell_at_apta.com (202) 496-4803
  • Procurement
  • KellyAnne Gallagher, kgallagher_at_apta.com, (202)
    496-4895
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com