Relevant but Inadmissible - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Relevant but Inadmissible

Description:

Relevant but Inadmissible – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: BAKE8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relevant but Inadmissible


1
Relevant but Inadmissible
  • FRE 407, 408, 409, 410, 411

2
Where we are to date
  • Rule 402 Relevant evidence is presumptively
    admissible.
  • Rule 403 Relevant evidence may nonetheless be
    excluded if it is subject to misuse or likely to
    waste time.
  • Rule 404 No character evidence to show action
    in conformity therewith.
  • This week More types of evidence where the risk
    of misuse is so high that it is reasonable to
    exclude categorically all evidence of that
    type.

3
Categorical Exclusion
  • 407 Subsequent remedial measures
  • 408 Compromise and offers to compromise
  • 409 Payment of medical expenses
  • 410 Plea discussions and withdrawn pleas
  • 411 Liability insurance

4
Why keep this information out?
  • Truth-seeking values
  • Low probative value
  • Prejudice estimation problems
  • Prejudice regret matrix problems
  • Efficiency
  • Low probative value
  • Avoid extended litigation on collateral issues
  • Other (non-truth-seeking) values
  • Encourage post-accident repairs
  • Protect openness of settlement/plea negotiations

5
Tort Precautions Review
  • U.S. v. Carroll Towing (2d Cir. 1947)
  • Liability is a function of (1) P the
    probability of loss (2) L the likely severity
    of the loss and (3) B the burden of adequate
    precautions.
  • A precaution is necessary if B lt PL.
  • So if the precaution (B) costs 100
  • To prevent a 10 (P) chance of loss,
  • And the loss (L) would cost 20000,
  • 100 lt 10 x 20000,
  • So the precaution is necessary.

6
Tort Precautions Revisited
  • You are the CEO of Disney.
  • Providing security in your parking lot will cost
    10,000 (B)
  • To prevent a 10 (P) chance a guest will be
    mugged in the parking lot,
  • And the mugged guest will lose an average of
    1,000 (L).
  • 10,000 vs 10 x 1,000
  • Do you take the precaution?

7
Subsequent Remedial Measures
  • Not Admissible for
  • Negligence and negligence-plus cases
  • Negligence
  • Culpable conduct
  • Strict Liability cases
  • Product defect
  • Need for warning
  • Admissible for
  • Ownership
  • Control
  • Feasibility of precautionary measures, if
    controverted
  • Impeachment

8
Doctor discontinues Heparin 3 hours before surgery
  • Stopping Heparin 3 hours before surgery is an
    accepted medical practice.
  • Administering Heparin within 3 hours of surgery
    is unsafe. It would have caused fatal bleeding.
  • Administering Heparin within 3 hours of surgery
    is unsafe. The risk of fatal bleeding outweighs
    the risk of heart attack.

9
Settlement Negotiations
  • Not Admissible for
  • Validity of claim
  • Amount of claim
  • Admissible for
  • Bias of a witness
  • Negating a contention of undue delay
  • Obstruction of criminal investigation or
    prosecution

10
Offers to Compromise
  • Furnish, offer or accept a valuable consideration
  • Compromise or attempt to compromise
  • Claim
  • Disputed as to validity or amount

11
Payment of Medical Expenses
  • Not Admissible for
  • Liability
  • Admissible for
  • Anything else

12
Plea Negotiations
  • Withdrawn guilty pleas
  • Nolo contendere pleas
  • Statements made during plea discussions

13
Plea Negotiations
  • Not Admissible for
  • ANYTHING against the ?, except ?
  • Admissible for
  • If ? introduces another part of the plea
    negotiation
  • In a criminal proceeding for perjury

14
Liability Insurance
  • Not Admissible for
  • Negligence
  • Admissible for
  • Agency
  • Ownership
  • Control
  • Bias of a witness
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com