Title: The Role of Assessment in Achieving Institutional Effectiveness
1The Role of Assessment in Achieving Institutional
Effectiveness
- Assessment in Administrative and Educational
Support Services - Created by Dennis George
2Administrative Units
- Units that provide services which maintain the
institution and are essential to its operations,
but do not directly impact the institutions
instructional programs, e.g. - Accounting Office
- Office of the Registrar
- Physical Plant
3Educational Support Units
- Units which, while not primarily instructional in
nature, contribute directly to student learning
or instruction. - Academic Advising Center
- Library
- Information Technology
- Provide services which directly relate to the
student and are part of the institutions overall
learning environment.
4Overview of Assessment Process
- Each Administrative and Educational Support (AES)
Unit identifies what is intends to accomplish to
support the Institutional Mission/Purpose.
5Overview of Assessment Process
- AES Unit assesses or measures the extent to which
these objectives are being met - Client satisfaction
- External Evaluations
- Direct measure of unit performance
- Assessment of student outcomes following receipt
of services (I.e. what the student knows, thinks,
or is able to do as a result of receiving the
service)
6Overview of Assessment Process
- AES Unit uses results of assessment to improved
services to students or other clientele.
7Overview of Assessment Process
- AES Unit Closes the loop by
- Describing the use of results
- Documenting the use of results to improve services
8Working DefinitionAES Outcomes
- Statements from an Administrative and Educational
Support Unit that identifies what it intends to
accomplish to support the Institutional
Mission/Purpose.
9Administrative Units
- Objectives for Administrative Units are primarily
process oriented and describe the support
process or service which the unit intends to
accomplish - Improve services to handicap students
- Monthly accounting reports to academic and
administrative departments will be processed and
distributed promptly - Transcript requests will be filled and returned
promptly
10Educational Support Units
- Objectives for Educational Support units contain
both process and outcomes oriented statements - Outcomes oriented statements
- Concern the units direct impact upon students or
clients served - Describe what the client will be able to do after
receipt of the service
11Educational Support Units
- Examples of Outcomes Oriented Objectives
- Students will be able to utilize the librarys
reference services efficiently - Before their last semester in attendance at the
institution, graduates seeking employment will
prepare an acceptable resume for presentation to
potential employers - Students will be proficient in logging on the
Internet through the academic computing center.
12Additional Sample Objective Statements
- Outcome statements
- Students will learn how to use library resources
- Graduates will have the ability to write a resume
13Additional Sample Objective Statements
- Process Statements
- Library will be efficient in book acquisitions
- The Accounting Office will promptly process
vendor statements
14Additional Sample Objective Statements
- Satisfaction Statements
- Students will be satisfied with Library
circulation service - Vendors will report prompt payment
15Long List Short List
- Identify a long list of administrative objectives
supporting the activities described in the Unit
Mission Statement - From the long list, identify two or three
objectives for assessment to focus on each
assessment cycle
16Long List Short List
- Selected objectives should be
- Targeted on those areas which the unit staff
believe can be improved by using the currently
available resources and personnel - Related to the services the unit provides
- Relatively easy to assess within one assessment
cycle - Directly under control of the AES unit
17Working Definitions
- Criteria for Success The benchmark that the
program sets for the objective and against which
the objectives performance is judged by the
faculty within the department - These criteria are most often stated in terms of
percentages, percentiles, averages, or other
quantitative measures
18Working Definitions
- Means of Assessment The method, tool, or
instrument used to determine whether (and/or the
extent to which) the Objectives Criteria for
Success has been achieved
19Types of Assessment used in AES Units
- Attitudinal measures of client satisfaction
- Direct measures or counts of units services
- External validation
- Outcomes measures observation, performance
20Types of Attitudinal Assessment
- Standardized
- Noel Levits
- ACT
- NCHEMS
- Locally Developed
- Alumni Surveys
- Graduating Student
- Employer
- Point of Contact
21Primary and Secondary Criteria
- For example, if you are doing a survey that has a
1 5 scale (1 very dissatisfied and 5 very
satisfied) - Primary criteria Students will report an average
of 3.4 or higher score on overall satisfaction - Secondary criteria On no component of the survey
will the average rating be less than 3.0
22Other Examples of Attitudinal Assessments
- University of Mississippi Graduating Student
Survey - University of Mississippi Undergraduate Alumni
Survey - Career Center (point of contact survey)
23Direct Measures or Counts
- Volume of Activity (e.g. number of persons
served, attending, etc.) - Level of Efficiency (e.g. average time for
response) - Measure of Quality (e.g. average errors per audit)
24More Examples
- Admissions Application Response Timing
- Campus Security Availability of Parking
- Career Services Resume Distribution
- Computer Services Information Distribution
- Food Services Cafeteria Services
25External Validation
- Periodic assessment of the relationship of the
department/units efforts to good and acceptable
practice by a neutral person who is
knowledgeable in the field - Auditor
- Consultant
- Public health inspector
- Fire Marshall
- Peer-Professional Association
26Review Issues for Means of Assessment and
Criteria for Success
- Specific identification of the means
- To whom and when it will be administered
- By whom and based upon what will results be
judged - How well the group of students or unit ought to
score
27Example Library
- Administrative Objective
- The Library will acquire adequate collections of
information resources to support curriculum needs
- Means of Assessment and Criteria for Success
- Institutional faculty survey will indicate an
average ranking of at least 3.5 ( on a 5 point
scale) on items related to satisfaction with
library collections. On no single item will
satisfaction be reported as less than 3.0
28Example Library
- Administrative Objective
- Students will know how to use library resources
- Means of Assessment and Criteria for Success
- 80 of freshmen students enrolled in UC 101 will
locate 9 of the 10 resources explained in the
Library Orientation workshop
29Who is Involved?
- The AES Unit Director or Head
- Lead staff in assessment planning,
implementation, and service improvement - Submit assessment plan for the unit
- Resist procrastination
- Avoid closing their office door and emerging with
the assessment plan
30Who Is Involved?
- Professional Staff
- Identify and select administrative objectives
- Determine means of assessment
- Determine criteria for success
31Suggested Steps
- Formulating Unit Assessment Plan
- Establish a linkage to the Institutions
Statement of Purpose. Identify which portion of
the State of Purpose the AES Unit supports - Prepare the AES Unit Mission Statement
- Formulate Administrative Objectives
- Identify Unit Means of Assessment and Criteria
for Success
32Suggested Steps
- Moving from Planning to Implementation an Use of
Results - Conduct Assessment Activities
- Document Use of Results for Service Improvements
33Components of an Assessment Plan Report
- Reference to the institutions mission and goals
and its support by the units mission statement - Formulation of administrative objectives
- Identification of means of assessment and
criteria for success for each administrative
objective - Summary of the data actually collected when the
planned assessment took place - Description of how these data were used to
improve services
34Common Problems
- No match of means of assessment with objective
- Lack of a criteria for success
- Clarity of means of assessment description and/or
to general terminology in describing what is
anticipated from the means of assessment - Using words like all or 100
- Choosing appropriate method for measuring
outcome/objective - Failure to describe specifically how measurements
will be made