Title: Lunar Facts
1Lunar Facts
- The moon ended its formation period approximately
4 billion years ago. - After the period of formation, the surface of the
moon continued to be heavily bombarded by the
remains of planetary materials. This period is
common to all planets and is referred to as the
period of Late, Heavy Bombardment. During this
period, the moon warmed, separated into a core
and mantle, and experienced volcanism. Toward
the end of this period the moon is thought to
have experienced a series of significant
collisions which formed the lunar Maria. - Due to its small size, the moon should have
cooled very rapidly compared to earth. All
surface activity in the form of plate tectonics
would have ceased once the moon had cooled. Even
today, the interior of the moon appears to have
cooled to a point of complete inactivity.
2Factors to be taken into account when
hypothesizing about formation of the Moon
- the moons low density of 3.3 g/cc proves that
the moon does not have a significant iron core
like the earth does, - the moons rocks contain very few volatile
substances which implies it was heated more than
the earth - the earth and the moon have identical values for
the relative abundance of oxygen isotopes, which
implies that the Earth and the Moon formed at the
same distance from the sun.
3The Five Major Theories of Formation of the
Earths Moon
4Evidence supporting the Co-accretion Theory
- States that the earth and the moon accreted at
the same time out of the same nebular material - In this theory, the proto-moon drew material out
of the same nebular cloud as the earth in the
same relative location as result, the two should
be very similar in composition - Why it doesnt work The co-formation theory
explains why the moon is located in its current
location, but cannot explain the evidence that
the earth and moon are composed of different
materials.
5Co-accretion Image
6Did the moon form by Fission?
- Theory proposed by Darwin
- Based on fast-spinning primordial earth
- Earth spun and flattened so quickly that it
ejected a large piece of material, which
eventually became the moon - Strengths Isotopic ratio and Iron content
similarities between Earth and Moon are explained - Flaws Energy needed to cause loss of the
material not supported by present day spinning of
the earth -
7The Capture Theory
- Ring of dust around the earth slows the moon,
which has already formed, allowing it to be
captured into the earths gravitational field.
8Capture Theory Continued
- The Capture theory postulates that the moon was
formed at another place and time in the solar
system and while passing by the earth, it was
pulled into the earths gravitational field. - Reasonable hypothesis because many moons
surrounding other planets are actually captured
asteroids and not objects that formed in place
with the mother planet. A moon that is captured
would most likely have a non-spherical shape.
Ex. Phobos and Deimos, the moons of Mars
9The Moons of Mars (captured satellites)
10Why the Capture theory does not work
- indicator that a moon has been captured would be
if it orbited in a direction that differed from
that of the mother planet, but our moon is
rounded in shape and orbits the earth, the
capture theory does not hold up. - The only piece of evidence supported by the
capture theory is the difference in composition
between the earth and the moon.
11The Colliding Planetesimals Theory
- Hypothesizes that the moon condensed from the
debris of planetesimaly sized objects that
collided during the formation of the solar system
- Limited evidence to support this theory
12The One that Works!
- The Collision-Ejection Theory
- aka The Giant Impactor Theory
13What this theory is all about
- hypothesizes that the moon was formed when a
planetesimal the size of mars struck the earth,
thereby ejected large volumes of matter from the
earth. - disk of orbiting material ejected from the
collision eventually condensed to form our moon
in its orbit around the Earth.
14Origin of the Theory
- The theory was proposed in the mid-1970s, but
was rejected by many scientists until 1984 when a
conference evaluating the validity of theories of
the moon left no doubt that the collision theory
was the most likely possibility - New models of planet formation had suggested that
giant impacts were not at all uncommon during the
late stages of terrestrial planet formation.
15Collision Theory Images
16(No Transcript)
17Why this theory works
18Explains the Lack of volatiles on the Moons
surface
- In order to explain the lack of volatiles on the
moon, we would need an event which created a heat
so high that all would have been vaporized. If
an object the size of Mars were to collide with
the forming Earth, the heat produced by this
collision would provide a reasonable explanation
as to why the moons surface characteristics
imply that it has been baked more than the
earth.
19The Iron Core of the Moon explained
- moon is also thought to contain a small iron core
- The collision theory states that the moon would
be able to retain the iron core even through the
collision. - The earths Iron core had already undergone
gravitational differentiation at the time of the
impact, therefore, the debris ejected from the
earth consisted of material from the iron
depleted rocky mantle.
20Supports similarities in Oxygen isotopic ratios
- The earth and the moon have exactly the same
oxygen isotope composition while rocks and
meteorites from different areas of the solar
system have differing ratios. - The similarity in isotopic ratios supports the
belief that the moon formed from material in the
earths vicinity.