Title: Hooman Darabi
1Integration of RF Front-End on SoC
Hooman Darabi
Broadcom Corporation Irvine, CA
2GSM Out-of-Band Blocking Issue
GSM out-of-band blocker profile
0dBm
-12dBm
-23dBm
-99dBm
PCS Band
Frequency, MHz
1990
2010
2070
1930
1910
1830
- Existing receivers use external SAW filter at the
input to attenuate large out-of-band blockers - The filter costs, and degrades sensitivity
3Example of Current 2/2.5G Phones
PA
TX_HB
TX_LB
RX_1900
2G SoC
TR Switch
RX_1800
RX_900
RX_850
RX SAW
4Problem of Full-Duplex Systems
TX Leakage
Large Blocker
RX Desired
Duplexer
RF IC
5Example of Current 3G Phones
2G TX
3G TX
TR Switch
3G RF IC
3G BB
3G RX
2G RX
6Next Generation 3G Phones
2G TX
3G TX
3G SoC
TR Switch
2/3G RX
2G RX
7Future 3G Phones
2G TX
3G TX
3G SoC
TR Switch
2/3G RX
2G RX
8Feed-Forward Blocker Cancellation
Blocker
Desired
LNA
Desired Band
Notch Filter
1.96G
- Similar to the SAW filter, the RF notch can not
be implemented on chip
9Concept of Receiver Translational Loop
LNA Frequency Response
Blocker
Desired
f3dB
fLO
Zero or Low IF
IN
RF Notch
RX Translational Loop
fLO
HPF
LO
f3dB
0
0
HPF Response
10Blocker Filtering Architecture
RX IN
LNA
Filter Enable
Power Detector
LOQ
HPF
Zero or Low IF
h(t)
HPF
LOI
H(t) h(t) Cos(wLOt)
- Filtering path is an LTI system
11Die Microphotograph
12Amplifier Measured Frequency Response
20
10
Gain, dB
Simulated
0
w/o Filtering
-10
w/ Filtering
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
Frequency, GHz
13Amplifier Measured Gain Over Frequency
20
1930M
1990M
10
Gain, dB
0
-10
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
Frequency, GHz
14LNA Measured Gain with Blocker at Input
22
21
Gain, dB
20
19
Blocker at 1.88GHz Desired at 1.96GHz
18
-10
-6
-4
-2
0
-8
Blocker Power, dBm
15TX Leakage Cancellation in 3G RX
- A blocker at fRX-DTX-RX/2, -30dBm leads to IIP3
-1dBm
-30dBm
-25dBm
fTX
fRX
fTX
TX
- Linearize the RX Challenging and power consuming
- Use a notch similar to GSM RX
- Notch easier to implement than GSM, as TX leak is
weak
163G TX SAW Removal
- In order not to affect RX sensitivity
considerably, PN at DTX-RX of -160dBc/Hz needed
fTX
fRX
fTX
fRX
- Design the TX to meet the PN Very power
consuming - Use an integrated notch at TX output
17Architecture of 3G TX with Notch Filtering
50W
New output impedance
fRX
fTX
PA Driver
PA
I
TX LO
Q
io
50 W
TX-to-RX Leakage
fRX
fTX
LPF
On-chip
Duplexer
I
RX LO
Q
18Up-Conversion Mixer PA Driver Circuits
VDD
Cap Array
Cap Array
Bias
BBIQ
LPF Output, IQ
I
Q
I
Q
TX LO
RX LO
19Die Microphotograph
20Measured TX Transfer Function
15
w/o filtering
10
TX Gain, dB
5
w/ filtering
0
1.89
1.93
1.97
Frequency, GHz
21Measured Receive-band Noise
TX at 1.85GHz
-152
Simulated
-154
Output Noise, dBc/Hz
-156
-158
Measured
-160
1.91
1.93
1.92
1.94
Frequency, GHz
22TX Measured Output Spectrum
-10
3.3dBm Output
-20
-30
-40
Output Power, dBc/30kHz
-50
-60
-70
-80
Center 1.85GHz, Span 25MHz
23TX Filtering Summary of Performance
24Conclusions
- Current cellular systems use many external
components for filtering and power amplification - Feed-forward blocker cancellation in the LNA
creates a notch in 2/3G receivers - Eliminates the need for a front-end RX SAW filter
- RF filtering performed efficiently when
translated to IF - Feedback based notch enables low-power SAW-less
3G TX - Future cellular RF ICs with RF filters and PAs
integrated are inevitable and imminent
25(No Transcript)