Title: Thinking Outside the Car
1Thinking Outside the Car
- Public transits role
- in a balanced transportation system
- in Northern Virginia
Christopher Zimmerman, Chairman Northern Virginia
Transportation Commission September 5, 2002
2Overview
- Public Transit and Ridesharing resources
- Transit and HOV performance
- NVTCs role in forging better connections between
transit systems and other modes - How the commonwealth can help NVTC as it works
for a better balanced transportation system
3Public Transit and Ridesharing Resources
4Interconnected Transit Systems
System Fleet size in Virginia
Metrorail 272
Metrobus 341
VRE 82
Fairfax Connector 175
DASH 49
CUE 12
ART 4
Loudoun Express and local 11/37
PRTC OmniRide 62
PRTC OmniLink 16
5Excellent HOV Facilities
- I-95/I-395
- I-66
- VA 267
- Route 1 (Alexandria)
6Transit and HOV Performance
7Northern Virginias FY 2001 Average Weekday
Transit Ridership
System Weekday Riders
Metrorail 147,375
Metrobus 73,206
Fairfax Connector 22,537
Virginia Railway Express 10,556
Alexandria DASH 9,172
City of Fairfax CUE 3,423
PRTC OmniRide 3,234
PRTC OmniLink 1,849
Loudoun Express 730
Arlington ART 588
Loudoun County Transportation Association 450
Total 273,120
8Transit / HOV Mode Shares (by corridor)
- Measures transit performance where investments
have been made. - During peak hours, transit carries one-third of
all commuters in the I-95/I-395/Route 1 corridor
and two-thirds in the I-66 corridor. - In no major Northern Virginia commuting
corridors, during peak hours, do single occupant
vehicles have a higher share than transit and
ridesharing.
9Transit/HOV Time Savings
- The Texas Transportation Institute reports the
travel time indices for the I-66/I-95/I-395 HOV
lanes are twice as good as the indices for the
parallel conventional lanes. - These times savings are important because the
average peak hour commuter in our region
experiences 84 hours of delay a year (third worst
in the nation) at a cost of about 1,600.
10Northern Virginia Travel Times by Mode I-95
Corridor Dumfries to Washington, D.C. (30 miles)
VDOT reports average VRE and HOV commuter travel
times in the I-95 corridor are much better than
travel by auto in the conventional lanes.
11Transit Fuel Savings
- Using a conservative methodology, transit uses
only half the fuel per passenger-mile traveled,
compared to autos. - In the Washington metropolitan region, transit
saves 47.8 million gallons annually.
12Transit Air Quality Benefits
- Transit in the Washington Metropolitan region
saves - 3,040 metric tons of volatile organic compounds
- 31,892 metric tons of carbon monoxide
- 1,533 metric tons of oxides of nitrogen
- 520,868 metric tons of carbon dioxide.
13Putting things into perspective
- To put these emission reductions into
perspective, the region must reduce its NOx
emissions in 2005 by about 1100 annual tons to
meet the federal standards. - Transit investments are prominently listed on the
regions list of proposed mitigating measures.
14Transit Investments Pay Off
- A NVTC study determined the rate of return on the
commonwealths investments in Metrorail is over
19 percent annually, measured in tax revenues
from induced economic activity.
15Other Measures
- Safety
- Transit beats autos in safety.
- Comfort
- Lifestyle benefits.
- Reliability
- Transit adheres to regular schedules and is
generally less susceptible to massive delays due
to traffic accidents and incidents.
16NVTCs role in forging better connections between
transit systems and other modes
17NVTC
- Serves six local jurisdictions, covering 1,000
square miles with a population of 1.5 million. - Appoints Virginias WMATA board members .
- Co-owns Virginia Railway Express (VRE).
- Obtains and allocates 100 million annually in
transit assistance. - Provides a policy forum for local/state elected
officials.
18Code Red Ozone Alert Free Bus Fares
- Region sets aside 75,000 per Code Red day for
free bus fares. - Part of overall strategy to meet federal clean
air standards. - Twelve Code Red free transit fare days so far in
Summer, 2002 vs. five in 2001. - NVTC manages funds, alerts public, promotes
broader participation by transit systems.
19Bus Fare Buydown
- 808,000 annual program reduces fares.
- Originally to compensate for lost transit revenue
due to relaxed HOV restrictions on I-66. - Now boosts ridership in one corridor each year
- I-66 in 2001
- I-95/Springfield Mixing Bowl in 2002
- Dulles Corridor in 2003
- Route 1 in 2004
20Corridor Studies
- NVTC managed a cooperative consulting study,
identifying transit/pedestrian/HOV improvements
in the Route 1 corridor (Fairfax/Prince William
counties). Now being used to guide the VDOT
center-line study. - NVTC led the evaluation of ITS technologies in
the Dulles corridor and produced a report that is
guiding the use of these new technologies.
21SmarTrip Fareboxes/ Clearinghouse
- NVTC represents six transit systems on WMATAs
executive team. - 5 million state/federal funded project.
- Installation of 370 fareboxes expected in early
2003. - Negotiating memorandum of understanding for
Clearinghouse executive management. - Clearinghouse expected in November, 2003
22Emergency Response
- NVTC assembled Northern Virginias transit
operators shortly after 9/11. - Solidified communication.
- Improved VDOTs policy on lifting HOV
restrictions. - Now part of ongoing regional emergency response
planning at MWCOG.
23NVTC Public Outreach
- Promoted transit safety and security response
with radio ads and new web page at
www.CommuterPage.com. - NVTCs new web presence at www.thinkoutsidethecar
.org provides enhanced interactivity between NVTC
and the public. The new site highlights - Information
- Research
- Events
- Legislative alerts
24Virginia Railway Express (VRE)
- NVTC began working to create VRE in 1984.
- Service began in 1992.
- As co-owner, NVTC manages VREs state grants and
audit. - NVTCs balance sheet shows assets (including VRE)
of a quarter billion dollars. - VRE is renowned for its customer service
innovations including Train Brain.
25How the commonwealth can help NVTC as it works
for a better balanced transportation system
261. Recognize Funding Disparities
- State reserves most revenue resources for itself.
- State funds a much higher percentage of road vs.
transit projects. - State doesnt meet its own limited funding goals
for transit. - NVTCs local governments 126 per capita for
transit is four times greater than any other
Virginia transit system. - NVTCs governments provide 72 percent of local
funds for transit statewide, but only receive 65
percent of state transit aid.
272 NVTC is Short Changed
- In FY2003, total state aid to NVTC/VRE is 68.7
million - 49.9 million for FTM
- 18.8 million for capital
- NVTC state aid shortfall 75.4 million
- 57.8 million FTM
- 17.6 million capital
- The commonwealth does not meet its own statutory
targets for sharing in transit investments with
localities.
283 All Transit in Virginia is shortchanged
- Total state transit aid 97 million
- 73.2 million for FTM
- 24.2 million for capital
- State shortfall 111 million
- 81.8 million for FTM
- 22.6 million for capital
29Other ways the commonwealth can help
- Create a six-year plan, with an emphasis on
multi-modal systems, that is meaningful with an
open/transparent process that allows local
governments to respond before it is locked into
place. - Give the region equitable treatment.
- Give transit its fair share of any new revenues.
- Promptly issue bonds approved by the General
Assembly for transit
30Even more ways the commonwealth can help
- Be an advocate for transit systems, their
customers, and the local governments that must
pay the lions share. - Seek more transit funding in the federal TEA-21
reauthorization process. - Encourage better cooperation and performance from
the freight railroads hosting VRE. - Above all, fully fund the existing state transit
programs.