Measuring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring

Description:

New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. Grade Level Expectations (GLE's) for grades 3 8. Administered October 3 25, 2006. Mathematics. Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: kathleen56
Category:
Tags: carp | measuring

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring


1
Measuring
  • Student
  • Progress

2
Triangulation
  • Classroom Performance
  • NECAP Standardized Measures

3
New England Common Assessment
Program NECAP
4
Introduction
  • New England Common Assessment Program
  • New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont
  • Grade Level Expectations (GLEs) for grades 3 8

5
  • Administered October 3 25, 2006
  • Mathematics
  • Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
  • Reading
  • Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
  • Writing
  • Grades 5 8
  • Format
  • Multiple-choice
  • Short answer
  • Constructed-response,
  • Writing prompts

6
Proficiency Levels
  • Level 1 Substantially Below Proficient
  • Level 2 Partially Proficient
  • Level 3 Proficient
  • Level 4 Proficient with Distinction

7
Reading
  • Proficient with Distinction
  • Reads challenging material with accuracy and
    fluency
  • Independently self-monitors and self-corrects
  • Demonstrates significant conceptual understanding
    and higher-order thinking in analysis of text
  • Makes insightful inferences within and across
    texts

8
Reading
  • Proficient
  • Reads a variety of grade level material, both
    literary and informational, with a fluency rate
    consistent with purpose for reading
  • Reads orally with fluency and expression
    appropriate for grade level
  • Able to choose appropriate independent reading
    material
  • Able to self-monitor and self-correct
  • Uses a variety of grade appropriate strategies to
    decode and/or derive meaning from the text
  • Able to identify key story elements and cite
    evidence appropriate for grade level
  • Makes reasonable predictions and makes
    appropriate inferences

9
Reading
  • Partially Proficient
  • Fluency rate on grade level material does not
    always match purpose for reading
  • Uses limited strategies to decode and/or derive
    meaning from text
  • Can identify basic story elements and text
    features
  • Often chooses independent reading material that
    is too difficult
  • Oral reading may indicate an inattention to
    meaning
  • Applies limited self-monitoring and
    self-correcting
  • Demonstrates skills that are underdeveloped or
    applied inconsistently

10
Reading
  • Substantially Below Proficient
  • Demonstrates an inability to use resources and
    strategies independently to derive meaning from
    context
  • Underdeveloped vocabulary which impairs ability
    to comprehend
  • Has difficulty identifying main ideas and basic
    text features
  • Not likely to choose independent reading material
  • Reads significantly below grade level

11
Mathematics
  • Proficient with Distinction
  • Demonstrates logical reasoning with strong
    explanation that include words and proper
    mathematical notation.
  • Exhibits high level of accuracy, effective use of
    a variety of strategies and an understanding of
    math concepts within and across grade level
    expectations.
  • Moves from concrete to abstract representations.

12
Mathematics
  • Proficient
  • Demonstrates logical reasoning with appropriate
    explanations that include words and proper
    mathematical notation.
  • Uses variety of strategies that are often
    systematic.
  • Computational errors that do not interfere with
    communicating and understanding.
  • Demonstrates conceptual understanding of most
    aspects of grade level expectations.

13
Mathematics
  • Partially Proficient
  • Demonstrates logical reasoning and conceptual
    understanding in some, but not all, aspects of
    grade level expectations.
  • Starts problems correctly, but computational
    errors may get in the way of completing some
    aspects of the problem.
  • Uses some effective strategies.
  • Demonstrates generally stronger with concrete
    than abstract situations.

14
Mathematics
  • Substantially Below Proficient
  • Problem solving is often incomplete, lacks
    logical reasoning and accuracy, and shows little
    conceptual understanding in most aspects of grade
    level expectations.
  • Starts some problems but computational errors and
    lack of conceptual understanding interfere with
    solving problems successfully.

15
Writing
  • Proficient
  • Recognizes what the prompt is asking for and
    produces a response that is appropriate for grade
    level
  • Develops controlling idea and focus that is
    appropriate to the prompt
  • Makes appropriate transitions between paragraphs
  • Uses effective topic sentences and sufficient
    elaboration and support within paragraphs
  • Uses some sentence variety and appropriate word
    choice/vocabulary
  • Demonstrates sufficient command of task
    structures and conventions
  • Response has an opening and closing

16
Scaled Scores
  • Three-digit number
  • Range 00-80
  • First digit grade
  • Grade 3 300-380
  • Grade 4 400-480
  • X40 is cut point for Proficient
  • Grade 3 340
  • Grade 4 440

17
Range of Proficient Levels
Achievement Level Cut Scores Grade Subject
SP PP P
PD 3 Reading 300-330
331-339 340-356 357-380
3 Mathematics 300-331 332-339
340-352 353-380 4 Reading
400-430 431-439 440-455
456-480 4 Mathematics 400-430
431-439 440-454 455-480
5 Reading 500-529 530-539
540-555 556-580 5 Mathematics
500-532 533-539 540-553
554-580 5 Writing 500-526
527-538 539-553 554-580
6 Reading 600-628 629-639
640- 658 659-680 6
Mathematics 600-632 633-639
640-652 653-680 SP Substantially
Below Proficient, PP Partially Proficient, P
Proficient, PD Proficient with Distinction
18
NECAP Student Report Fall 2005
  • Individual Results
  • Achievement Level Compared to Other Students by
    School, District and State
  • Students Performance in Content Area
    Subcategories

19
S T U D E N T R E P O R T
Student Performance Relative to Proficiency
Levels (with scaled scores and confidence
intervals)
Student Performance Relative to Content Area
Subcategories
20
Student Performance Relative to Proficiency
Levels and Scaled Scores
21
Student Performance Relative to Grade Level Peers
22
Student Performance Relative to Content Area
Subcategories
23
Example -- Crescent Lake School
  • Testing Year
  • Grade 4 October 2005
  • Teaching Year
  • Grade 3, 2004-2005
  • Grade 4 AYP reported to Carpenter School

24
READING
Testing Year
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
MATHEMATICS
Testing Year
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
WRITING
Testing Year
31
(No Transcript)
32
Released Items 2005
  • Grades 3-6
  • Math
  • Reading
  • Writing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com