Effective%20Transition%20Planning%20through%20Community%20Resource%20Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Effective%20Transition%20Planning%20through%20Community%20Resource%20Mapping

Description:

Kelli Crane, Ph.D. Marianne Mooney, Ph.D. TransCen, Inc. DCDT Conference ... presented by Kelli Crane, Ph.D., and Marianne Mooney, Ph.D., of TransCen, Inc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: kel125
Learn more at: http://www.ncset.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effective%20Transition%20Planning%20through%20Community%20Resource%20Mapping


1
Effective Transition Planning through Community
Resource Mapping
  • Kelli Crane, Ph.D.
  • Marianne Mooney, Ph.D.
  • TransCen, Inc.

DCDT Conference October 24, 2003
2
Purposes of Session
  • Highlight Secondary Education and Postschool
    Outcome Data
  • Identify National and State Secondary Education
    and Transition Issues
  • Define Community Resource Mapping
  • Outline the Roles Intermediaries Play
  • Introduce the Community Resource Mapping Process
    and Tools

3
Postschool Outcomes Still Poor
  • Despite efforts made by many concerned
    stakeholder groups over many years, research
    reveals poor postschool outcomes for youth with
    disabilities in many target areas such as
    postsecondary education, employment, independent
    living and self-sufficiency, community
    participation, and self-advocacy.

4
Postschool Outcomes Still Poor (cont.)
  • Predominant themes from studies over two decades
  • Lower than desired academic achievement levels
  • High dropout rates
  • Substantial levels of unemployment and
    underemployment
  • Economic instability and dependence (poverty)
  • Social isolation
  • Low levels of participation in postsecondary
    education and training programs
  • High adjudication rates

5
The National Perspective on Transition Issues
  • Providing access to a full range of secondary
    education curricular options and learning
    experiences
  • Developing transition-driven IEPs that are
    person-centered and positive
  • Conducting accurate assessments (achievement and
    other skills)
  • Having flexibility in diploma options for youth
    who do not pass mandatory state tests
  • Providing youth and their families with
    transition information
  • Improving collaboration among diverse agencies
    that play roles in secondary education and
    transition

6
The National Perspective on Transition Issues
(cont.)
  • Identifying new funding options
  • Making seamless linkages between youth systems
    and adult systems
  • Establishing employer partnerships for work-based
    learning and employment
  • Conducting public awareness campaigns
  • Conducting research and evaluation activities
    that document transition outcomes
  • Developing the competencies and qualifications of
    school and adult service agency personnel
  • Streamlining for improved communication and
    coordination

7
Priority Issues in States (9/03)
  • State Systems Infrastructure and Leadership
  • Data Collection and Use
  • Collaboration (Interagency)
  • Professional Development
  • Access to General Education, Standards, and
    High-Stakes Testing
  • Postsecondary Access, Enrollment, Options
  • Graduation/Dropout Rates
  • Workforce Development and Employment
  • Person-Centered Planning (IEPs,
    self-determination, independent living)
  • Family Involvement

As determined at the National Center on
Secondary Education and Transition Leadership
Summit, September 2003, and in follow-up
technical assistance to States. For more info, go
to www.ncset.org.
8
Priority Issues in Our State
9
Challenges to Collaboration
  • IDEA has no teeth no mandate to bring all the
    players to the table
  • Difficulty anticipating postschool service needs
  • Unenforceable interagency agreements
  • Limited cross-agency communication and
    resource-sharing
  • Differing eligibility and funding for agency
    services
  • Failure to think beyond traditional service
    systems and partners
  • Sustaining efforts
  • Turf Issues

10
  • If everyone is doing it,
  • how come it
  • NEVER gets done?

11

12
Resource Mapping
  • A method used to link community resources with
    shared visions, organizational goals, strategies,
    or expected outcomes.

13
Features of Success
  • Focuses on assets
  • Builds relationships
  • Works across boundaries
  • Aligns systems and services
  • Long term not a quick fix

14
Types of Resource Mapping
  • Resource Identification
  • Resource Utilization
  • Community Asset Identification
  • Program and Policy Analysis
  • Accountability and Compliance Analysis

15
Possible Mapping Content
  • Financial resources
  • Goals and outcomes
  • Human resources
  • Policies and legislation
  • State academic and technical standards
  • Youth and adult services

16
Why Map?
  • Accomplish a specific task or goal (e.g., improve
    employment outcomes)
  • Improve the situation for a specific population
  • Develop a systemic and coordinated approach to
    transition planning
  • Improve service delivery
  • Identify new resources
  • Determine whether existing resources are being
    used effectively
  • Establish cross-agency evaluation and
    accountability systems
  • Develop innovative interagency financing
    strategies
  • Promote collaborative staff development programs
  • Work smarter!

17
(No Transcript)
18
Main Elements of Mapping
  • Clear vision
  • Partnership builders and brokers
  • Benefits for all involved
  • Assessment of assets and gaps
  • Consensus/willingness to contribute toward a
    common goal
  • Evaluation and consistent updates
  • Achieving more together than alone

19
Mapping Process
  • Step 1 Pre-mapping/Assessment
  • Step 2 Mapping Resources
  • Step 3 Implementing the Map for Strategic
    Results
  • Step 4 Evaluation/Mid-course Correction

20
(No Transcript)
21
  • All change is difficult, no matter how long you
    put it offJoe Marrone Institute for Community
    Inclusion, UMass-Boston

22
Intermediaries Common Characteristics
  • Hold players in a complex and fragmented
    workforce development system together
  • Advocate for innovation in workforce development
    overcoming existing practices and policy
    through new partnerships, programs, and
    priorities
  • Address challenges to better meet the needs of
    employers, job and skill seekers, and providers
  • Create and support effective collaborations among
    stakeholders on behalf of youth
  • Identify opportunities and mechanisms for
    aligning and coordinating various community
    resources

23
Intermediaries Common Characteristics
  • Provide or broker services by understanding
    special needs of employers and workers
  • Organize multiple partners and funding streams
    around common goals to develop programs and
    policies to improve labor market outcomes
  • Achieve results with innovative solutions to
    common, persistent workforce problems ensuring
    quality and impact of local efforts
  • Promote policies that sustain effective practices
  • Provide ongoing consultation and accountability

24
(No Transcript)
25
Example
  • Increase the participation of youth ages 14-21
    in structured paid work-site experiences by 50.

26
Resources
  • National Center on Secondary Education and
    Transition
  • www.ncset.edu
  • National Collaborative on Workforce and
    Disability for Youth www.ncwd-youth.info
  • McKenzie Group www.mckenziegroup.com
  • Search Institute www.search-institute.org
  • Center for Youth Development Policy Change
    (AED)
  • http//www.aed.org/us/youth.html
  • School Main Institute http//www.schoolandmain.
    org/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com