Feature Interactions between SIP Call Control Services - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Feature Interactions between SIP Call Control Services

Description:

but user may be located at discus.cs.stir.ac.uk and be logged on as mko0123 ... From: sip:chris_at_discus.cs.stir.ac.uk ;tag=1c8060 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:322
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mariok
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feature Interactions between SIP Call Control Services


1
Feature Interactions between SIP Call Control
Services
  • Mario Kolberg
  • University of Stirling

2
Introduction SIP
  • SIP Session Initiation Protocol, IETF
  • used for signalling, setup, modification and
    termination of a session
  • media is separate
  • text based protocol, based on HTTP
  • 2 types of devices end devices and servers
  • user agents initiate and respond to signalling,
    send and receive media, may provide services,
    e.g. SIP phones, soft phones
  • servers redirect, proxy, registrar

3
Location of User
  • SIP supports user mobility
  • email like addresses sipmko_at_cs.stir.ac.uk
  • but user may be located at discus.cs.stir.ac.uk
    and be logged on as mko0123
  • public address vs. current location
  • users need to register with a registrar
  • work closely with proxy and redirect servers
  • invitations are sent from UA via a number of
    servers to another UA
  • can host services

4
A SIP Example
Bob
Laura
(1) INVITE
(2) 180 Ringing
(3) 200 OK
(4) ACK
Conversation
(5) BYE
(6) 200 OK
5
Feature Interactions
  • truly distributed architecture
  • highly programmable components
  • servers may be under the control of different
    organisations
  • end users may deploy their own services
  • increased number of addresses

6
Applied Approach
  • Triggering party
  • Connection type
  • Source, destination
  • Original connection
  • Connection after feature activation
  • Parties Treatment

7
Applied Approach
  • Analysis pairs of features
  • Compare two feature descriptions according to
    four rules
  • Single User Dual Feature Control
  • Connection Looping
  • Redirection and Treatment
  • Diversion and Reversing

8
Single User Dual Control
CFB TP B (A, B) ? (A, C) CFU TP B (A, B) ?
(A, C)
AR TP A (B, A) ? (A, B) HL TP A (A, B) ?
(A, B)
9
Connection Looping
CFB TP B (A, B) ? (A, C) CFU TP C (A, C) ?
(A, B)
10
Redirection and Treatment
CFB TP C (A, C) ? (A, B) OCS TP A (A, B) ?
(A, Treat)
AR TP B (A, B) ? (B, A) OCS TP B (B, A) ?
(B, Treat)
11
Diversion and Reversing
CFB TP C (A, C) ? (A, B) AR TP B (A, B) ?
(B, A)
CFB TP A (B, A) ? (B, C) AR TP B (A, B) ?
(B, A)
12
Application to SIP
  • SIP CGI (ish)
  • when a service gets executed its description is
    included into the message
  • descriptions are included using a new header
    (Contype)
  • if there is already a description, apply the
    rules to find interactions
  • services need to be surrounded by a cocoon which
    contains the description for that service and the
    algorithm

13
Resolution
  • if an interaction is detected ?? resolution
  • results from second service are discarded
  • more elaborated approaches possible, policies
  • approaches may be tuned towards various goals
  • most services executed
  • execute all services which are subscribed to by
    the party who pays for the call
  • private environment services of an organisation
    may have priorities over services of an
    individual
  • its all about priorities
  • currently, the priority is with the services
    executed first

14
Example
Contype IDCFU TPsipbob_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.uk
OrigFromchris_at_discus.cs.stir.ac.uk
OrigTobob_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.uk FinalFromchris_at_
discus.cs.stir.ac.uk FinalToalice_at_d254203.cs.sti
r.ac.uk
  • Not all services are triggered by INVITE messages
  • some are triggered by responses (486 Busy)
  • Contype header needs to be copied into responses

15
Experimentation Example 2
  • SER, Pingtel phone, kphone

16
Experimentation
  • SIP/2.0 200 OK
  • Via SIP/2.0/UDP 139.153.254.50branchz9hG4bKafde
    .6e4854d4.0
  • Via SIP/2.0/UDP 139.153.254.222
  • ConType IDCFU TPsipalice_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.u
    k
  • OrigFromchris_at_discus.cs.stir.ac.uk
  • OrigToalice_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.uk
  • FinalFromchris_at_discus.cs.stir.ac.uk
  • FinalTobob_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.uk
  • Forwarded-To ltsipbob_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.ukgt
  • From ltsipchris_at_discus.cs.stir.ac.ukgttag1c8060
  • To ltsipalice_at_d254203.cs.stir.ac.ukgttag1A8019B3
  • Contact "root" ltsiproot_at_139.153.254.2035062tra
    nsportudpgt
  • Record-Route ltsipalice_at_139.153.254.203ftag1c80
    60lrlrgt,
  • ltsipalice_at_139.153.254.50ftag1c8060lrlrgt
  • Who sent this reply Alice or Bob?
  • Contact header
  • Record route

17
Case Study Results
  • 9 services
  • CFU, CFB, OCS, TCS, VM, AR, DND, HL, GR

18
Discussion
  • all distributed interactions are detected
  • single component interactions are an issue
  • if a service drops original INVITE which services
    is executed first?
  • are single component interactions in fact
    interactions in SIP?
  • usually a list of services to be executed on a
    component ? implicit ordering/priorities
  • ISSUES multiple addresses for a party
  • identifying a party from a response message

19
Discussion cont.
  • some services are triggered differently than in
    the PSTN
  • CFBTCS do not interact?

Alice
Proxy (CFB, TCS)
Bob
Chris
INVITE Bob
403 Screened
INVITE Bob
486 Busy
INVITE Chris
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com